無處分權的人 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [wúchǔfēnquánderén]
無處分權的人 英文
a person with no right of disposition
  • 無 : 無Ⅰ動詞（沒有） not have; there is not; be without Ⅱ名詞1 （沒有） nothing; nil 2 （姓氏） a surn...
  • 處 : 處名詞1 （地方） place 2 （方面; 某一點） part; point 3 （機關或機關里一個部門） department; offi...
  • 分 : 分Ⅰ名詞1. （成分） component 2. （職責和權利的限度） what is within one's duty or rights Ⅱ同 「份」Ⅲ動詞[書面語] （料想） judge
  • 權 : Ⅰ名詞1 [書面語] （秤錘） counterpoise; weight （of a steelyard）2 （權力） power; authority 3 （...
  • 的 : 4次方是 The fourth power of 2 is direction
  1. Finally, delivery of cargo without original bills of lading promote the development of shipping in a way in practice, it has reasonability in existence. chapter three is writer ' s study for 10 leading cases of chinese maritime court and court of cassation concerning delivery of cargo without original bills of lading, writer conclude as follows : chinese courts are inclined to regard it as breach of contract but not in tort in judicial practice ; chinese courts allow the plaintiff to choose to sue in tort or of breach ; chinese courts have abandoned the viewpoint of " who holder the bills who must have the right to sue " or " who holder the bills who must win the case " ; and in many cases concerning delivery of cargo without original bills of lading, the court ignored plaintiff ' s actions against the carrier, it proved that carrier can escape reasonability of delivery of cargo without original bills of lading in some cases

    第三章論述我國海事法院及其上級法院就無單放貨案件審理的司法審判實踐研究，通過對十個法院判例的分析、歸納，筆者認為，在司法實踐中，法院越來越傾向于將無單放貨糾紛視為運輸合同糾紛處理，而不認定為侵權行為糾紛；法院允許原告起訴時以侵權起訴或違約起訴作出選擇；法院對提單持有人的訴權認定，已經不採用「誰持有提單誰就有訴權」與「誰持有提單就能保證勝訴」的觀點；有諸多的無單放貨的訴訟案例以被法院駁回起訴為結局，證明了無單放貨在特定情況下的合理性以及承運人有避免承擔責任的可能性。
  2. The withdrawal right of a debtee, also known as the right of charge withdrawal, is the right that the creditor possesses, when the original debtor has relinquished a creditor ' s right to a third debtor and implemented unconditional or low - condition policies towards the amount owed which in turn infringes the rights of the original creditor, to request the court to revoke and withdraw the actions of the debtor

    所謂債權人的撤消權，又稱罷訴權，是指當債務人放棄第三人的債權，實施無償或低價處分財產的行為而有害於債權人的債權時，債權人可以請求法院撤銷債務人的行為。
  3. In our future real right law, there should be some limitations to the open objects, hut nor the open contents in the property register of immovables ; lawsuit time limit should not he applied to return protoplast right of applicant ; we had better constitute positive prescription system ; powerless punish should not affect the force of contracts when the endorser has no right, but the transferee is well - meaning ; there should be proper toleration to the unanimous consent principle on punishing mutual thing ; we should prohibit mortgaging to some movable property which has no way to open ; there should not be the time limitation when mortgager realizes the hypothec after the fulfilling tern ; of primary creditor ' s rights is over, except that mortgager is not the debtor ; when the debtor do not refund the debt, the mortgager cannot get the guaranty directly, but he may put in for the court to auction guaranty

    摘要我國未來物權法，對于不動產登記簿的開放對象應當有所限制，但對于開放內容不應有所限制；物權人的返還原物請求權不應當適用訴訟時效；應當建立取得時效制度，並應區分一般動產、準不動產、未登記不動產而規定不同的成立條件；在動產的轉讓人為無權處分而受讓人為善意的情況下，轉讓人與受讓人之間的合同是否有效不應當以「無權處分」為條件，只有在轉讓合同無效的情形下，受讓人取得標的物的所有權才是依善意取得制度的取得，此時的取得是原始取得；在共同共有的情形下，原則上處分共有物應當經共有人全體一致同意，但應容有若干例外；不應當規定居住權；動產抵押的公示方式問題無法徹底解決，如果規定動產抵押，應當實行登記要件主義，適于烙印、打刻或貼標簽的動產，應當採取烙印、打刻或貼標簽的方式，其他無法解決公示方式的動產應當禁止抵押；主債權履行期屆滿后，抵押權人行使抵押權，原則上不應當有一個時間限制，但抵押人非為債務人時可容有例外；在債務人不償債時，抵押權人不能直接讓抵押人交出抵押物，實現抵押權，但可以持抵押權登記簿副本直接申請法院拍賣抵押物。
  4. After a comparative law survey and analysis of scholars ’ opinions on this matter, i am convinced that the revocatory right refers to the right enjoyed by the beneficiary who can revoke the disposition so as to make it void, when the trustee, in breach of trust, disposes of the trust property

    所謂信託受益人的撤銷權系指在信託關系中，受託人違反信託目的處分信託財產的，受益人得撤銷該處分行為使之歸于無效的權利。該撤銷權是一種形成權，其法律意義主要在於，作為一種救濟措施，可供受益人選擇以維護其信託受益權。
  5. The opinion that considers the transferee ' s good faith as the substitute for the transferor ' s right of disposition lacks foundation in law

    認為受讓人的善意替代處分人的處分權，從而持繼受取得說的觀點於法無據。
  6. The implementation of this system for more man ten years clearly shows that the multi - channel institution of retrial does not produce the desired effects. the present retrial system modelled itself mainly on that of the former soviet union, its operation in china gives rise to more state intervention than individual disposal, more layman recognised truth than truth recognised by law, seeking justice in substantial law more than legal procedure, and finally brings about " numerous applicants, unlimited lapse of time, high frequency, confused jurisdiction, unmethodical causes of action "

    現行民訴法實施十多年的司法實踐表明發動再審程序主體的多元性並沒有產生預期的效果，由於現行的民事再審主要是參照前蘇聯模式，在再審程序的啟動上，強調國家干預權，忽視當事人處分權；在事實認定上，追求客觀真實，忽視法律真實；在糾錯上，注重實體公正，忽視程序公正；從而導致在實際操作中出現了啟動再審的「主體無限、時間無限、次數無限、審級無限、理由或條件無限」的不良現象。
  7. To add " there are many loopholes in the operation and sales practices of telecommunications service providers, " after " that, as " ; to add " and such complaints from the public are often not followed up effectively by government departments, " after " in recent years, " ; to add " stipulate corresponding penalties " after " to cover pay television, " ; and to add " ; furthermore, as the hong kong housing authority has signed agreements with pay television operators, these operators can enter the buildings to set up and maintain communal aerial systems and can deploy front - line promoters to approach the residents to sell other various commercial services, using the provision of exclusive maintenance and supply services as a selling point and adopting unscrupulous means to entice or mislead the residents into signing an agreement with them, causing great disturbance to the residents ; in this connection, the government must adopt measures to combat such sales malpractices, take the initiative to inform public rental housing tenants of the rights and responsibilities of the operators and, when the operators resort to malpractices or malpractices are reported by residents, take immediate action to investigate the matter and issue warning to and penalize the operators concerned ; the government must also review the problem of inequity in accessing system information by consumers and the telecommunications service providers, whereby consumers have no means or right to obtain true and accurate information about the systems that they are using and can only pay the fees according to the volume, system and time slots of their calls shown on the records provided unilaterally by the service providers, and in case of queries about such information, the decision of the service providers prevails and there is no channel for the consumers to dispute or verify ; to this end, the government should expeditiously study how to ensure that consumers have the rights to know, choose, verify, appeal and claim for compensation in the provision of telecommunications services including pay television, local and cross - boundary telecommunications and internet services " after " in the contracts "

    在"鑒于"之後加上"各電訊服務提供者的營運和銷售存在不少漏洞， "在"不斷增加， "之後加上"而市民的投訴又往往得不到政府部門的有效跟進處理， "在"收費電視， "之後加上"訂定相應的罰則， "及在"標準合約條款"之後加上"此外，由於香港房屋委員會與收費電視營辦商簽訂協議，該等營辦商可進入大廈鋪設及維修公共天線系統，並調派前線銷售人員，以獨家提供維修及供應服務作為招徠，向住戶推銷其他各種商業服務，以不當手法誘使或誤導住戶與他們簽約，對居民造成很大困擾就此，政府必須採取措施打擊上述違規營銷的手法，並主動告知公屋住戶該等營辦商的權責范圍，遇有營辦商作出違規的行為或居民舉報營辦商的違規行為時，須立即追查，並向有關營辦商發出警告及作出處分政府亦須檢討現時消費者與電訊服務供應商所獲系統資訊並不對等的問題，即消費者無從及無權得知他們所選用系統的真實資料，令他們只能按服務供應商單方面提供有關通話量通話系統及通話時段的記錄繳交費用，遇有消費者質疑上述資料時，往往只由服務供應商作最終決定，消費者無從申辯或查證就此，本會促請政府盡快研究如何就各類電訊服務包括收費電視本地及跨境電訊網際網路等的提供，確保消費者享有知情權選擇權覆核權投訴權及索償權" 。
  8. Common law takes the view that the actor should take responsibility of what has done with the precondition of a valid contract. even analyzing the consideration theory of commom law, the unauthorized disposition wont lead to the lack of consideration then make the contract invalid the international demonstration law, representing the development trend of world law, even expresses the theory that unauthorized disposition had nothing to do with validation of contract in a more explicit way in their legislation. hence the countries with advanced civil law all think or tend to mink mat unauthorized disposition contract should n ' t be invalid just only because of the action of unauthorized. china civil law should also follow the trend

    英美法系則認為處分人應負權利擔保責任，而這一責任承擔的前提應是合同有效。即使從英美法系的約因理論分析，處分人無處分權也並不會造成缺乏約因，不會導致合同無效。代表了世界法律發展趨勢的國際示範法則更為明確地表達了處分人無處分權與合同效力沒有關系的思想。
  9. Securing judgment procedure is to protect the legal rights of creditor, under that aim, there also exist two direct aim, one is safeguard the execute of the judicial addict made in the future, the other is to avoid the unredemptive damages chapter 3 the type of civil securing judgment procedure this chapter researches into the type of civil securing judgment procedure and relevant legal basis in main countries, including the arrest and einstweligeverfugung in germany and japan, the juger en refere iprocedure and qrdanance sur requite in france, attachment, temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction in u. s, pre - judgement rremedies in britain, and property preservation and advance execution in china the civil securing judgment procedure system of france, u. s. and britain don t meet the situation and tradition custom of china, while the civil securing judgment procedure system of german and japan has deficiency the conclusion of this chapter is, we should reasonably reform current civil securing judgment procedure system of china, reconstruction the dual civil securing judgment procedure system under the division of property preservation and action preservaition chaptei4 court has the power of jurisdiction this chapter researches into the court which has jurisdiction to different kinds of securing

    筆者認為，民事保全程序存在審理階段的保全程序和執行階段的程序，是特別的訴訟程序和執行程序兼容；民事保全請求權屬于廣義上的訴權；民事保全權屬于裁判權（司法權）和行政權並存；民事保全程序應當體現迅速原則、全面保護雙方當事人；權益原則、程序正當原則、保全措施的標的有限原則；民事保全程序的總目的是為了保護債權人的合法權益，其直接目的有二：一是保障將來執行文書的強制執行，二是：避免將來無法挽回的損失。第三章民事保全的類型本章對各主要國家關於民事保全的類型及其依據逐一作了論述：德國和日本的假扣押與假處分、法國的緊急審理程序和依申請作出裁定的程序、美國的， 、一。扣押和中間禁令、英國的臨時性救濟措施、我國的財產保全和先予執行。
  10. In the chapter one, the following questions are discussed and introduced : elements, categories of forged endorsement of bill and interrelated conceptions ; should an unauthorized signature be treaded as a forged action or a valid action and which of enactment is more feasible

    在第一章中就偽造背書的構成要件、分類及與相關概念的區別加以介紹，著重對票據背書行為中的無代行權人代行簽章是按無權代理抑或偽造背書處理，何者更為可行
  11. From the second to the fifth chapter such problems concerning state - owned property right are illustrated respectively as its definition, valuation and price fixing and capital sources of undertaking party and the disposal and use of transfer income. problems are raised with regard to the process of current property right system diversity in state - owned enterprises, such as the disagreement to the definition of state - owned property right, no standard of evaluation, imperfection of price fixing system and relative confusion of transfer income disposal and use. what ' s more, new solutions are offered : the probe into state - owned property right definition " changsha model " is confirmed positively ; two specific ways of quantification - - " the method of average growth rate of state - owned property right " and " the method of average cost of labor in market " ; the concept " present value of earnings " is applied to the property evaluation of receivable accounts, finished goods, invisible assets and so on ; the unjust in price fixing of state - owned property right can be avoided by improving property valuation methods, perfecting capital market especially property right trading market and bettering information publishing system ; as to the guarantee problem of human resources financial contribution, an original key is offered

    第一章運用產權理論對國企產權多元化改革進行經濟學分析；第二章至第五章主要圍繞國有產權的界定問題、評估問題、定價問題、承接方的資金來源問題、轉讓收入的處置運用問題分別進行闡述，指出了當前國企產權多元化過程中存在著國有產權界定不統一、評估不規范、定價機制不完善、處置運用相對混亂等諸多問題，並提出新的解決思路：肯定國有產權界定「長沙模式」的積極探索意義，提出量化職工創造剩餘價值的「國有資產平均增長率法」和「平均市場勞動成本法」 ；將「收益現值」概念運用到對應收賬款、產成品、無形資產等資產評估之中；應從完善資產評估方法、完善資本市場特別是產權交易市場和健全信息公開機制三個方面來解決國有產權定價不公問題；就人力資本出資的擔保問題提出實際債務承擔額（比例）應小於名義出資額（比例）的新思路，並認為人力資本市場上的交易價格應包括絕對出資額和相對出資額兩部分。
  12. The third section : the effectiveness of eigentumerhypothek in the part, the author separately discusses the force of the die eigentumerhypothek mit forderung and the eigentumerhypothek ohne forderung. the thesis holds that the obligee ca n ' t initiatively exert the hypothec, can deal with the stake according to the law, and as to die eigentijmerhypothek mit forderung, the stake can be picked out from the bankruptcy, but the ei gen turner hypo thek ohne forderung ca n ' t be so. the fourth section : the necessity of accepting eigentumerhypothek in the part, the article argues that adopting eigentumerhypothek meets the need of insuring the benefit balance between the parties, of strengthening our hypothec legislation, and of development of the economy and the judiciary practice

    第三部分所有人抵押權的效力在這個部分，筆者從所有人抵押權的處分、抵押物的處分、抵押物在破產法上的別除權以及所有人抵押權的實行等四個方面分別對保有債權的所有人抵押權和不保有債權的所有人抵押權的效力進行了論述，認為所有人抵押權既然不是一種抵押權，當然無抵押權的固有效力，因而權利人不可以主動實行所有人抵押權，而抵押物仍然可以依法處分，保有債權的所有人抵押權，其抵押物在破產法上享有別除權，而不保有債權的所有人抵押權則不享有別除權。
  13. Unauthorized person ' s disposal of the real obligee ' s rights will possibly cause the loss of the real obligee ' s rights, which relates to the real obligee ' s interests and the protection of the transaction safety, and the establishment of the force system of the cud is to protect the transaction safety. based on related analysis, this thesis reaches the conclusion that the validity of the cud is to protect transaction safety, which is also in accordance with other civil legal systems

    無處分權的人對真實權利人的權利進行非正常的處分行為，可能導致權利人的權利的喪失，這關繫到對真實權利所有人的利益和對交易安全的保護問題，無權處分行為制度設計的目的是為了保護交易安全，本文通過相關論述得出結論：堅持無權處分行為的有效性正是保護交易安全，同時也和其他民事法律制度相互協調一致。
  14. The present article understands that the improvement of the civil regime relies on insistence of the following principles : ( l ) the assurance of judicial justice, as to realize the axiological objective of the regime ; ( 2 ) proportional intervention, on interfering illicit civil activities, proportionality should be considered ; ( 3 ) procedural effectiviness, to achieve the maximum litigation effect with the minimum litigation cost specially for the cases in which technical defects are found, but in the mean time, common interest are not prejudiced, the promotion of civil protest may lead to an expenditure much higher than the litigation value, therefore, civil protest authority should not promote the civil protest

    維護司法公正原則，是完善民事抗訴制度的重要原則之一，體現了制定這項制度的目的；適度干預原則在強調對違法民事行為進行干預的同時，指出這種干預應是適度的。抗訴的適度性體現在兩個方面：一是尊重當事人的處分權，二是維護法院裁判的既判力。訴訟效益原則指出，民事抗訴制度應以最少量的訴訟投入獲得最優化的訴訟效果，對于那些雖在技術上存在不足或缺憾之處但不損害公益的生效裁判，若提出抗訴可能導致人力物力的支出比裁判所涉及的訴訟標的額更大或造成當事人的無端訟累，抗訴機關不宜提出抗訴。
  15. Part three discusses the legislation evolution, the defects and the reconstruction of " no right to dispose " in china, the author proposes that the 51st article in contract law should be : contract is valid under the situation of unauthorized disposition of selling the other ' s property ; contract will be cancelled without the admittance of the owner ; the buyer will acquire the ownership if he obtains the goods on bona fide

    第三部分：我國無權處分立法沿革、缺陷及其重構。筆者建議我國的無權處分立法應重新建構為:無權處分人處分他人財產，合同有效;未得到權利人的追認或者無處分權人事後未取得處分權，合同解除;買受人善意佔有該物的，依法取得所有權。
  16. In the part of " ingredients ", this paper discusses the four elements which constitute the concept of bona fide possession of bill rights : valid endorsement, untitled endorser, endorsee with goodwill, and reasonable consideration, on the basis of the legislation of different countries in light of relative cases. in the part of " legal consequence ", this paper stresses t he relationship between true beneficiary and endorses in goodwill. the author insists that the endorsee in goodwill has the final right to gain the rights of bill, and the true beneficiary, ca n ' t claim for recovery or compensation

    在構成要件部分，筆者以各國票據立法為基礎，結合案例分析，重新闡釋了票據權利善意取得的四個構成要件，即有效票據轉讓行為、讓與人無處分權、受讓人善意和相當對價；在法律後果部分，筆者在強調了票據權利善意取得制度旨在調整真正權利人與善意受讓人的關系，使善意受讓人得以終局地取得票據權利，真正權利人不得對其請求回復和賠償之外，對該制度所引發的間接後果，即真正權利人與無處分權人、無處分權人與善意受讓人之間的利益分配和責任承擔進行了全面分析。
  17. 3. the gist lo judge a contract ' s legal effect is item 52 of contract law. according to mis item, only when unauthorized disposition harm country ' s interest or the other party of business still conduct the business after knowing that the one he deals with is unaumorized, the unauthorized disposition contract is invaiid. the former invalidation is because of consequence of tehavior, the latter invalidation is because of the other party ' s malice. aumorized disposition contract is also invalid in the same circumstance

    三、判定合同無效的依據應是合同法第52條。以該條的規定考量無權處分合同，僅會在無權處分人的欺詐行為損害了國家利益及交易相對人明知處分人無處分權從而構成惡意串通這兩種情形下，無權處分合同無效。前一種情形是由於行為後果一導致合同無效，后一種情形則是因相對
  18. The constituting conditions include : object condition ( mainly applied to chattels, thing possessed under entrust ) ; subject condition ( the transferor is a person having entire ability of civil action and he is the legal person possessing the object ; the transferee cannot be a person with naught ability of civil action ) ; impersonality condition ( the transferor makes a transfer having no right, the transferee gets the practical possess of the property through a valid and costly trade ) ; subjective condition ( the transferee is in good faith )

    善意取得制度的構成要件包括：客體要件? ?標的物主要是動產（佔有委託物） ；主體要件? ?讓與人為完全民事行為能力人、並且是標的物的合法佔有人，受讓人不能是無民事行為能力人；客觀要件? ?讓與人為無權處分、受讓人通過有效之有償交易行為而取得財產的現實佔有；主觀要件? ?受讓人善意受讓財產的交付。
  19. The transferee ' s good faith is his ignorance of the transferor ' s want of right of disposition without any significant negligence when the subject matters are movables and ignorance of the mistake of the register when real transaction

    標的物為動產時，受讓人不知無處分權且無重大過失時構成善意。標的物為不動產時，受讓人不知登記簿錯誤即可構成善意。
  20. The requisites to constitute acquisition in good faith include : the unauthorized transferor has a reliable outward manifestation of right of disposition, which is possession when the subject matters are movables and registered as owner when real transaction

    善意取得的成立要件為：處分人無處分權卻有值得信賴的權利外觀，這在動產表現為佔有，在不動產表現為是登記的權利人。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書