無過錯責任 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [wúguòcuòzérèn]
無過錯責任 英文
liability without fault
  • 無 : 無Ⅰ動詞（沒有） not have; there is not; be without Ⅱ名詞1 （沒有） nothing; nil 2 （姓氏） a surn...
  • 過 : 過Ⅰ動詞[口語] （超越） go beyond the limit; undue; excessiveⅡ名詞（姓氏） a surname
  • 錯 : Ⅰ形容詞1 （錯誤; 不正確） wrong; mistaken; erroneous 2 （用於否定: 壞; 差） bad; poor 3 （交叉; ...
  • 責 : Ⅰ名詞（責任） duty; responsibility Ⅱ動詞1 （要求做成某事或行事達到一定標準） demand; ask for; req...
  • 任 : 任名詞（姓氏） a surname
  • 過錯 : fault; mistake
  • 責任 : 1. （應做的事） duty; responsibility 2. （應承擔的過失） responsibility for a fault or wrong; blame
  1. After the comparative analysis of the reasons for exoneration in legislations in germany, japan and france, the author points out the attitude that our country should adopt on this issue, and then analyze the conflict on the reasons for exoneration between general principles, desposition methods and pronunciation, finally, the author calls for legislation to solve the issue. part ii : the identification of the liability subjects for vehicle accidents

    通過比較德國、日本和法國這三個適用無過錯責任的國家在免責事由方面的立法，指出我國在機動車交通事故免責事由上應當採取的態度，繼而分析了《民法通則》 、 《處理辦法》以及《公告》三者之間在免責事由方面的沖突，建議盡快通過立法予以解決。
  2. A study on no - fault liability doctrine of environmental civil damage

    環境民事損害的無過錯責任原則研究
  3. As to the serial legal cases of compensation of personal injury of electric shock, power supply enterprises should bear no - fault liability first, on the basis of which the victim should be commensurately liable according to the degree of fault in the course of personal injury

    據此，對于觸電人身損害賠償案，供電企業應首先承擔無過錯責任，在此基礎上，根據在人身損害過程中存在的過錯程度，受害人承擔相應的責任。
  4. Whether damages - produces are the liability subjects shall be examined by fault liability and no feult liability. while the subject of fault liability is determined by the standard " fault ", that of no fault liability is decided by the transportation interests. using the two standards : fault and transportation interests, the author specifically analyze the identification of liability subjects under such circumstance as the drive by a thief or unorthorized person, a lease - holder, a borrower, a purely transferee, or a employee, nominal user, or by a nominal remainder

    第二部分：機動車交通事故損害賠償責任主體的認定考慮到機動車交通事故的致害人可能不只一人，致害人是否為責任主體，須經過輔責任和無過錯責任兩個原則的撿驗，本部分詳細分析了無過錯責任之責任主體的認定標準，並具體分析了盜竊駕駛和擅自駕駛、租賃和借用、單純轉移機動車佔有、雇員為僱主駕駛、名義貸與和名義殘留場合下的損害賠償責任主體。
  5. Should the infringer without fault pay damages to the right holder

    損害賠償是否適用無過錯責任
  6. Doctrine of no - fault liability

    無過錯責任原則
  7. On principle of no - fault liability for intellectual property rights infringement

    論知識產權侵權行為的無過錯責任歸責原則
  8. Liability without negligence

    無過錯責任
  9. The application of the principle of no - fault liability to under - age students ' accidents

    論無過錯責任原則在未成年學生傷害事故中的適用
  10. Legality crisis of tort law - jurisprudence thought from liability for wrongs to liability without fault

    從過錯責任到無過錯責任變化的法理學思考
  11. Fair liability and product liability have no effect on the reasonability of no fault liability applied to vehicle accidents

    公平責任和產品責任並不影響對機動車交通事故適用無過錯責任的合理性。
  12. Fault liability and no - fault liability have to be combined with each other as a result of rapid development of industry and technology

    但由於工業與科技的快速發展，不得不將過錯與無過錯責任相結合。
  13. Economic law focused on no - fault liability and responsibility of equitable responsibility, with a particular focus on the equitable responsibility

    經濟法責任側重於無過錯責任和公平責任，尤其側重於公平責任。
  14. In our country, the doctrine of liability fixation of damages in road traffic accident used to be doctrine of no fault liability, and now is a combination of both doctrine of no fault liability and doctrine of liability for wrongs

    摘要我國道路交通事故民事損害賠償責任歸責原則經歷了一個從無過錯責任到過錯責任與無過錯責任相結合的過程。
  15. In this thesis, the author mainly investigates the application of liability without fault principle and causation of epidemic disease in this kind of crime

    對破壞環境資源保護罪在刑事責任上應採用無過錯責任原則，在處罰上擴大罰金刑和非刑罰措施，在司法認定該罪因果關繫上應采納疫學的因果關系。
  16. Firstly, this discourse defines the concept of vicarious liability of employers ; clarifies the characteristics of this system by comparison with other systems and describes the theoretical basis in stress. secondly, this discourse brings forward that, the principle adjusting the vicarious liability of employers shall a combination of doctrine of tort liability under the standard liability " s direction and doctrine of no - fault liability

    其次，運用比較分析的方法，在對不同立法類型和學說分析和評價的基礎上，提出僱主轉承責任的歸責原則應為本位責任指導下的過錯責任和無過錯責任相結合的原則，僱主轉承責任構成必須具備的四個要件，並詳細闡述了四個要件的判斷標準。
  17. The thesis constructs the system of civil compensate for environmental damage resulting from gene pollution in some aspects, such as liability principal, constitutive requirements, compensation principle, compensation range, compensation mode and certification of causality. the thesis thinks that some rules from traditional environmental tort should apply to environmental tort resulting from gmos, including no - fault liability, inferred causality and the inversion of the burden of proof. the thesis indicates china should found the funds for prevention of gene risk and create the system of funds for prevention of gene risk in some aspects, such as the mission of funds, resource of funds and operation of funds

    最後，本文認為，與傳統污染相比，基因污染有隱蔽性、增殖性、不可清除性和後果的不確定性等特點;基於風險防範原則和污染者負擔原則，從責任主體、構成要件、賠償原則、賠償范圍、賠償的類型、因果關系的鑒定等方面創造性地構建了gmos導致的環境損害民事賠償制度，主張傳統環境侵權中的無過錯責任原則、因果關系的推定和舉證責任的倒置等也應適用於gmos導致的環境侵權;鑒于傳統民事侵權賠償救濟的種種局限，本文強烈主張構建gmos損害賠償社會化救濟機制，即成立基因風險防範基金，並從基金的用途或任務、基金的來源和基金的具體運作等方面開拓性地建構了基因風險防範基金制度的雛形，設計了基因風險防範基金的兩個配套制度，即基因稅制和gmos強制責任保險制度。
  18. With the rapid advances of technology and social development, tortuous acts assume a trend of grow in social life. the separation of tort law from the law on obligations and the establishment of no fault liability and fair liability principles mark a new historical stage of tort law

    隨著技術的飛躍、社會的發展，侵權行為在社會生活中呈現擴張趨勢，侵權法從債權中的分離及其無過錯責任原則、公平責任原則的確立標志著我國的侵權法已經步入一個新的歷史階段。
  19. The text is analyzing and discussing several important and controversial legal issues on the motor vehicle third party liability compulsive insurance, putting forward some standpoints and speculations. in addition to the preface and postscript, the full text is totally divided into five parts. chapter one firstly introduces several controversies in the judicatory fulfillment on the motor vehicle third party liability compulsive insurance which caused by the judgment of the national first case, which under the background of the implement of “ road traffic safety method ”, but at that time “ the motor vehicle compulsive insurance regulation ” did n ' t yet pedestal

    《道路交通安全法》雖然規定了機動車的無過失責任原則，以圖更好保護弱者受害人利益，但實際上由於機動車強制保險未真正落實，保險公司仍使用商業保險條款，否認機動車責任險具有「強制性」 ，導致在面對交通事故進行賠付時出現功能錯位，從而增加了機動車一方的賠償責任，也使受害方得不到應有的救濟，沒有體現無過錯責任原則的社會承擔性。
  20. The common liability principle of tortious liability of securities fraud is fault liability, with the exception of non - fault liability. so, it is not particular tortious liability but common tortious liability. on the condition of forming joint tort, the multi - actors should bear joint liability

    證券欺詐的侵權責任以過錯責任為一般歸責原則，以無過錯責任為例外，屬於一般侵權責任；在構成共同侵權的情況下，多個行為人須承擔連帶責任。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書