特有物權 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [tèyǒuwùquán]
特有物權
英文
special property- 特 : Ⅰ形容詞(特殊; 超出一般) particular; special; exceptional; unusual Ⅱ副詞1 (特別) especially; v...
- 有 : 有副詞[書面語] (表示整數之外再加零數): 30 有 5 thirty-five; 10 有 5年 fifteen years
- 物 : 名詞1 (東西) thing; matter; object 2 (指自己以外的人或與己相對的環境) other people; the outsi...
- 權 : Ⅰ名詞1 [書面語] (秤錘) counterpoise; weight (of a steelyard)2 (權力) power; authority 3 (...
- 特有 : specific; peculiar; characteristic; proper特有財產 peculium; 特有風尚 genius; 特有景色 outlook
- 物權 : iura in re
-
Lastly, through summing up the general characteristics of the right in rem of water, the author contends that due to the special attribute which the subject of average right in rem lacks, the right in rem of water is subject to more limit than the common right in rem
最後對水物權的一般特點作出歸納,指出水物權的客體水具有一般物權客體所不具有的特殊屬性,由此也使水物權較普通物權受到較多的限制。Vendees " expectative rights are special rights forged by law, which hold the characteristics of real rights. expectative rights can be conveyed. methods of conveyance may follow provisions of personal property " s conveyance
買受人期待權的法律性質,主要有質權說、物權說、準物權說、債權說和特殊權利說。Furthermore, it analyzed the conflict in terms of the change of movable real right in the two systems and the effect of explanation and deploitation in terms of inscape of improper benefiting, scope of application and the effect of correcting the benefit imbalance which is caused by improper benefiting towards the system of non - reason of real right, and opened out the intrinsic relations between he system of non - reason of real right and the system of improper benefiting. the fourth part of the paper mainly analyzed our legislation pattern of real right alteration and the attitude towards non - reason of real right action in the field of civil law, and set forth the aim and existing obstacles in transplanting real right action and non - reason theory, and then pointed out, from the judge of theory, there are some factors of real right action in our exiting civil legislation and the biggest obstacle for transplanting the theory lies in the matter of cognition
關於物權行為無因性制度與不當得利制度的比較,主要分析了物權行為無因性在給付不當得利的構成要件、適用范圍等方面的解釋和開拓作用,以及不當得利制度對於物權行為無因性制度所引起的利益失衡的平衡作用,指出物權行為無因性與不當得利之間存在著某種內在聯系,在不承認物權行為無因性原則的立法例中,不當得利請求權處于輔助地位,在適用中多受限制;在以物權行為無因性原則為特徵的立法例中,不當得利制度在理論上具有圓通性,在實務上功能突出,成為救濟物權行為無因性所導致的利益失衡狀態的有效措施。The thesis lists five natures of the natural resources, on the base of which it discusses the merits and defects of the monopoly model and binary model, then presents the necessity of constructing a “ trisect model ” of real right system of natural resources. by making the comparison of nature and the objects between the civil real right system and the real right system of natural resources, this article believes that the real right system of natural resources, the need to implement the sustainable development strategy, is a new independent social right different from the civil real right system
本文深入的分析了自然資源的五大特徵(屬性) ,並以此為基點批判「一元」模式和「二元」模式的弊端與缺陷,提出構建「三元」模式自然資源物權制度的必然性;通過民事物權與自然資源物權在性質與客體兩方面的比較,認為自然資源物權是獨立於民事物權的新型權利,是環境危機背景下的可持續發展戰略的必然要求,屬于社會權,其制度構建應有別于作為私權代表的民事物權。I am looking forward to teachers " crucia l instruction. in order to construct the system of our country ' s usufructuary right, we must consider that the ownership of land belongs to the state, and the center of property law has been changed from proprietary to usufruct. this system can not only solve the conflict of possession and use of ground, but also provide guarantee on people who use others " property
筆者認為,我國用益物權體系的構建必須充分考慮我國公有制土地所有權的現狀,適應物權法從以「所有」為中心向以「利用」為中心的轉化,充分重視用益物權在物權法中的重要地位,建立一個適合我國國情的有中國特色的用益物權體系。As the hypogyny concept of usufructuary right, every right must have the control power, excluding power and the character of limitation and derivation. the management right of state - owned enterprise is the ownership in essence, so it is unsuitable to be prescribed in property law. some kinds of property rights are not included in the scope the usufructuary right, because they are only the manner of acquiring properties and usually regulated by the public law
特別法上的物權從其內涵上來看,屬于準物權的范疇,是取得物權的一種方式,盡管它們具有物權的部分特徵,甚至具有一定的私法性質,但其更多地體現了公法所進行的管理及約束,倘若將其放入用益物權體系,必然造成體繫上的不合理及繁瑣。At last, the value of the systematism is to be clarified in the second part, the author reveals the origin and the development of usufructuary right from the angle of contrast law. by describing the course of the usufructuary right in civil law countries, the author draws four conclusions. firstly, we should construct the system of usufructuary right on the focus of using property but not owning property
運用歷史分析的方法,先後描述了羅馬法上用益物權的源起及在大陸法系各個國家的繼承,最後得出有益於我國用益物權體系構建的幾個啟示:一是我國應該以物的利用為中心構建用益物權體系;二是用益物權體系的設計應該從我國現實出發,具有中國特色;三是採用功能構造法,對用益物權體系進布戲j分;四是設立一個具有開放性趨勢的用益物權體系。In the first part, the author researches the concept of usufructuary right and the basic questions on the systematism. in the first place, the author summarizes the meaning and character of usufructuary right, analyses the distinction of creditor ' s rights and property right from the origin of it and points out the quality of usufructuary right in the second place, the author emphasizes the essential request of a systematic usufructuary right. it must have the legible and uniform conception
首先概述了用益物權的內涵及特徵,並從其產生途徑上分析了債權和物權的區分,明定了用益物權的物權性質及其在他物權中的地位:其次重點論述了用益物權體系化的基本要求,不僅法律概念要有鮮明的位階性,而且要遵循物權法定主義原則,區分特別法上的物權和民法典中的用益物權;最後闡明了用益物權體系化的價值。Directed by new theories and approaches of sedimentology, diagenesis and reservoir evaluation, focused on marine clastic reservoir of donghe sandstone member, in tarim basin, strata and depositional system of donghe sandstone member are classified ; typical depositional facies types, depositional model and horizontal distribution have been studied through depositional facies analysis of 17 single wells, combined with seismic data. major diagenetic events, stages and " four history " collaboration have been systematically analysesed, furthermore, the relation between reservoir diagenesis and porosity evolution has been built ; thorough studies on reservoir lithology, physical property and pore structure, reservoir development related to depositional envoironment, diagenesis and tectonic has been discussed ; reservoir has been evaluated and predicted by five influential parameters drawn from the results of the study on depositional facies, diagenesis and reservoir characteristic. in the end, favourable reservoir body distribution has been pointed out
本論文以沉積學、沉積巖石學、沉積成巖作用與儲層地質學、儲層評價技術的新理論新方法為指導,以塔里木盆地巴楚組東河砂巖段海相碎屑巖儲層為主要研究對象,通過17口典型井的單井地層沉積相分析和成巖作用分析,結合地震資料,對東河砂巖段地層和沉積體系進行了詳細劃分,研究了東河砂巖段分佈區的典型沉積相類型、沉積模式及其平面展布特徵;系統分析了東河砂巖段碎屑巖儲層的主要成巖事件、成巖期次及其四史配置關系,指出了儲層成巖與孔隙演化的關系;深入研究了東河砂巖段碎屑巖儲層的巖石學特徵、物性分佈、孔隙結構等特徵,著重討論研究了沉積環境、成巖作用和構造作用對儲層發育的影響;運用「權重」評價法結合地層沉積相、成巖演化和儲層特徵研究的結果,選取了五個對儲層發育有重要影響的參數對儲層進行了整體的評價和預測,指出了塔里木盆地東河砂巖段儲層有利儲集體的分佈狀況。The pledge right of intellectual property is one kind of pledge rights, it thus has the characteristics of property right, mortgage, subordinacy, and priority of payment, which are held by normal pledge right. because the subject - matter of intellectual property is a kind of chose in action, it therefore has some features different from other rights and duties in its object, way of establishing, and way of realization
知識產權質權是權利質權的一種,因而具有物權性、擔保性、從屬性、優先受償性等一般質權的特徵,但由於知識產權標的物為一種無體財產權,因而其在客體、設定方式、實現方式上有著不同於其他權利質權的特徵。Concerning the fundamental content of public summons, the author firstly shows us its concept, and then searches some systems in roman law and germanic law which do not belong to the system of public summons but contain the function of public summons. after that, the author elaborates the option of the law to the means of public summons, and points out that registration is the means of public summons for real property and that of personal is possession. furthermore, the author gives us the four characters of means of public summons and the four kinds of legal validity of public summons
關于公示的基本內容,筆者首先交待了公示的概念;然後到羅馬法和日耳曼法上尋找具有公示機能而不是公示制度的一些內容;接著論述了法律對公示方法的選擇;揭示出了不動產物權的公示方法為登記,動產物權示方法為佔有;緊接著論述了公示方法應當具有的四個特點:公開性、準確性、法定性、統一性;最後簡單介紹了公示的法律效力:形成力、對抗力、推定力、公信力。And then, based on the feature of the guarantee legal system, present value trend of jus rerem and the study about the expecting right ' s theory, this essay suggest that the equitable mortgage in mainland china should be changed and absorbed into the hypotheca law system, and explain the rationality and necessity of the suggestion. after that, this essay also suggests to improve the rules and regulations about the equitable mortgage in mainland china by refering to hong kong ' s successful experiences about it. finally, this essay intends to set up an outline of law system for the equitable mortgage in mainland china so as to make it ruled by law
在此基礎上,結合我國擔保法律制度的特點和物權法的現代價值取向,以及有關期待權的理論研究成果,提出將內地實踐中的樓花按揭納入物權法中抵押權法律制度的立法設想,並論證其合理性和必要性,同時還建議借鑒香港地區的成功經驗完善內地有關樓花按揭的管理法規,初步建立起一個樓花按揭法律保障體系,最終將樓花按揭行為納入法治軌道。Though both real right and incorporeal property right belong to property right of control, they are different from each other in nature, which make them need different conditions and cause different effect on the obligee when they are acquired by the obligor due to acquisitive prescription
取得時效效力應限於取得支配型的財產權。物權和無形財產權雖同屬于支配型財產權,但各有自己的特點,這使得物權取得時效與無形財產權取得時效在構成要件和效力上有所區別,從而使二者成為取得時效的兩種具體類型。Since it has characteristics such as intangibility, prescription and regional definition, which real right and other civil rights do n ' t have, the possibilities and actual chances of invasions of copyrighter ' s exclusive utility are much more frequent and universal than that of the latter
由於其客體無形、具有地域性、受法定時間限制之類物權等民事權利不具有的特點,權利人的專有權范圍被他人無意及無過失闖入的可能性與實際機會,比物權等權利多得多、普遍得多。The writer thinks that the most important of risks in china ' s dc finance is : the bank cannot control and dispose of title of goods or tide documents so as to liquidate the liabilities under dc, therefore laws ant ! regulations of economy, such as law of tide, law of trust, and etc should be legislated. this may arouse or do help to studies or discussions of judicial circle or banking sector
信用證融資業務比傳統信貸業務風險系數小,但各種風險仍然交織在這種特殊的融資方式中,當前銀行貿易融資逾期成了普遍關注和深感棘手的問題,作者認為我國信用證融資的風險構成中最大的風險是,國內銀行不能依法控制貨物的物權,實現貨物的自行清償來達到控制業務風險的目的,提出了完善《物權法》 《信託法》等一系列經濟、金融法規,為法律界和金融界進一步進行理論和實務研究作了有益的探索。The author comments on the provision of habitio in < < the draft to seek suggestion of jur in rem law > >, point out that the role of habitio is limited to living safeguard obviously, lack of the recognizition of increase of role of habitio. the biggest drawback is lack of the method to secure the habitio hi the draft. this drawback will influence the employment of habitio " s role ; the provision is too simple to suit the practical complex need due to missing some important rule
本文對《物權法徵求意見稿》關于居住權的規定進行了評析,指出《徵求意見稿》明顯的將居住權的功能限定在基本生存保障上,對居住權的多元功能認識不夠;該稿最大的一個缺陷是居住權取得方式規定得太少,特別是沒有規定法定居住權,影響到居住權功能的發揮;關于居住權的規定過于簡單,一些重要的規則被遺漏,無法適應現實的復雜需要。In the author ’ s point of view, the concerning issue involves perception of the legal attributes of intellectual property, thus a perspective of comparison between property and intellectual property would be a significant way to perceive the issue ; then the thesis compares the property and intellectual property in details in aspects of legal objects, definition, attributes, content and the remedies with a conclusion that the intellectual property has no essential difference with the property law, while general principles of the property law could act as a direct guide to intellectual property, and this is a rational foundation for intellectual property being stipulated in the chinese civil code ; lastly the thesis expounds the rationalism of intellectual property being stipulated in the chinese civil code and the general mode
對此,筆者認為,知識產權在民法典中立法地位問題,涉及對知識產權的法律屬性和特點的認識,因此,從知識產權和物權的比較角度來認識知識產權,無疑會是研究確立知識產權在民法典中立法地位的一個很好的視角。接著將知識產權和物權就權利客體、二者的概念,權利性質,權利內容,權利救濟這幾個方面加以比較探討。在此筆者得出認識:作為規范無形財產之支配、利用關系的法律,知識產權法與規范有形財產歸屬關系的物權法並無本質區別,物權法的基本原則,對于知識產權應當具有直接的指導作用,這使將知識產權納入民法典具有合理基礎。Priority, in a narrow sense, is the precedent right in compensation that the claimants of certain special financial claims enjoy on the part or all of the debtor ' s property, which includes the general priority and special priority
優先權是特種債權的債權人依法享有的就債務人的總財產或特定財產價值優先受償的權利,包括一般優先權和特別優先權。優先權性質上屬於法定擔保物權。The term " real right " as mentioned in the present law means the exclusive right of direct control over a specific res enjoyed by the holder in accordance with law, including ownership, usufractuary right and real rights for security
本法所稱物權,是指權利人依法對特定的物享有直接支配和排他的權利,包括所有權、用益物權和擔保物權。Writer ' s view of point is that delivery of cargo without original bills of lading has the character of breaching of the contract, because releasing cargo against original bills of lading is carrier ' s legal liability in carrying out the carriage of goods by sea. also it has the character of action in tort, as if the actions violate the civil law of liability in tort, the doer shall take on the liability of compensation. however when actions are both of breach and in tort, the chinese law gives the victim the rights to choose to sue in tort or of breach, but some limitations in applying substantive law
第二章論述無單放貨的法律性質,筆者認為,無單放貨具有違約性,因為保證憑正本提單交付貨物是承運人在履行海上貨物運輸合同中的一項法定義務;無單放貨具有侵權性,只要無單放貨行為構成承擔侵權行為民事責任的要件,無單放貨行為人就必須承擔賠償責任;同時,無單放貨的違約性和侵權性可能構成責任競合時,我國法律允許受害人可以選擇一個訴因行使其請求權,但對實體法請求權的選擇,法律作出了一定范圍的限制;最後,無單放貨在某種程度上促進了航運業的發展,我們不能一概加以否定,無單放貨在特定情況下具有一定的合理性。分享友人