王明哲 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [wángmíng]
王明哲
英文
wang ming zhe-
On the enlightenment of wang tong ' s philosophy to the rationalistic confucian philosophical school during the song and ming dynasties
論王通哲學對宋明理學的開啟To realize this great selfish ambition, cultural and educational elite drastically criticized xikun scholars who held important political and educational positions but advocated poetic pursuit to escape from political dangers, and posed many models of educational discursive practice to control, better, and cultivate the full - of - desire societal life being neglected and thrown out of the academic sight by xikun school : firstly, in the early period, fan zhongyan and his followers, sun fu, and shi jie, et al., believed that confucian principles could be used to reform political, and educational institutions and improve society ; secondly, after fan, wanganshi, being treated as cultural rebel by other traditional moralists and politic competitors, did a failure of national wide educational and political reforms to cultivate financial talents, based on his coarse economics knowledge about how to enrich the central government ; thirdly, ou yangxiu and su shi focused attention on reform the highly rigidified literature and art education system at that time according to their cultural ideal that everybody has the right to express what his daily life, emotions and dreams, which could be seen as an irony by the fact that only themselves " life and feeling could enter into their literature and art education kingdom, while those who described lowly people " s experience, such as liu yong " s sentimental assays written specially for female performers and even the prostitutes, had to suffer from exclusion
但是，在十一世紀的文教空間中，真正值得考古學注意的知識是由理學家發明的，這不光因為，正是理學（而不是范學、王學、蘇學等這些在當時權力更大的知識）日後成了支配中國文教社會生活的權力，更是由於在十一世紀的文教界，只有理學家從一種最抽象的視角，認為十一世紀喧囂混亂的世俗生活及其基本的教化問題，無論多麼復雜，都可以歸結為人身上的理性與慾望之間的斗爭。就「哲學」能力而言，在渴望成聖、平天下的文教精英當中，理學家無疑是最出色的，他們能夠想到從「人」的結構出發，來認識世間紛繁復雜的現象，因而只需靜坐一處沉思人本身的秘密，而不必象王安石等人那樣認為到各地去調查，才可以摸清世間的狀況與問題。尤其不可思儀的是，他們的知識竟來源於看上去對教化世俗並不感興趣、只想追求長生不老的道士。Part 1 the background of the thought of taoxingzhi < 1 > according to a cadmic background, he sum up wang yang ming and due weirs educational and philosophic ideas scientifically, and use this thought on the basement of daily life education. < 2 > according to time background, tao ' s idea is fit for the requirements to the development of time
（一）從學術背景來看，他科學地吸收了王陽明和杜威的教育哲學思想及兒童教育思想的合理內核，並把「創造的兒童教育」思想建立在生活教育基礎之上； （二）從時代背景來看，陶行知「創造的兒童教育」思想的形成是時代發展對教育提出的新要求。The former five south china poets refer to sun fen, wang zuo, zhao jie, li de and huang zhe of guangdong
摘要南園前五先生，指元末明初的嶺南詩人孫? 、王佐、趙介、李德、黃哲五人。The popularizatin of quot; xing ling quot; literature in late ming dynasty
論王艮的幾個哲學命題對中晚明文學思潮的影響As far as foreign teaching thoughts are concerned, the paper focuses on the fundamental viewpoints of experienced teaching contained in the teaching thoughts of ancient greek philosophers, j. a. comenius, jean jacques rousseau, john dewey, etc. as for domestic teaching thoughts, the paper lays emphasis on viewpoints of experienced teaching contained in the teaching thoughts of confucius, metaphysicians of wei dynasty and jin dynasty, wang shouren, cai yuanpei
主要從古代、近現代中外教學思想中探尋體驗教學的淵源。國外部分，主要論述了古希臘哲學家、誇美紐斯、盧梭、杜威教學思想中蘊涵的體驗教學的基本觀點。國內部分，著重闡明了孔子、魏晉玄學家、王守仁、蔡元培教學思想中的體驗教學觀。The significance of life and death in evolution and the human philosophy on life and death
論王陽明的生死哲學及其現代價值Wang yangming is the most influential philosopher and the representative figure of mind studies in the ming dynasty
摘要王陽明是明代最有影響的哲學家，也是明代心學的代表人物。Chuan xi lu by wang yangming, a renowned philosopher of the ming dynasty, records a well - known dialogue regarding " watching flowers in the mountains. " this paper provides a new reading of it from the perspective of the subject - object relationship, discloses the truth of yangming ' s philosophical thinking in his dialogue, and makes a critical analysis of some representative misunderstandings by posterity in hopes of gaining a correct interpretation of traditional chinese philosophy
摘要明代著名哲學家王陽明《傳習錄》中記載了一段有名的「山中觀花」的問答，本文從主、客體關系角度重新予以解讀，揭示出陽明「山中觀花」問答哲學思維之真諦，並抽取後人的典型性誤解進行批判性分析，期望對中國傳統哲學予以正確解讀。分享友人