突起構件 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [tūqǐgòujiàn]
突起構件
英文
haunched member- 突 : Ⅰ動詞1 （猛沖） dash forward; shoot out 2 （高於周圍） protrude; bulgeⅡ副詞（突然） abruptly; sud...
- 起 : 起Ⅰ動詞1 （站起; 坐起） rise; get up; stand up 2 （取出; 取走） draw out; remove; extract; pull 3...
- 構 : Ⅰ動詞1 （構造; 組合） construct; form; compose 2 （結成） fabricate; make up 3 （建造; 架屋） bui...
- 件 : Ⅰ量詞（用於個體事物） piece; article; item Ⅱ名詞1. （指可以一一計算的事物） 2. （文件） letter; correspondence; paper; document
- 突起 : 1 （突然發生; 興起） break out; suddenly appear; suddenly arise; emerge or occur suddenly or unex...
-
Part one tries to have an analysis on the types and essential elements of international civil jurisdiction conflicts. after defining what is international civil jurisdiction and international civil jurisdiction conflicts and classifying international civil jurisdiction conflicts into positive and negative conflicts, the paper confines its research on positive conflicts of international civil jurisdictions. when disputants bring the same disputes to two or more courts of different countries, which all have legitimate jurisdiction over the said disputes and accept their complaints, international civil jurisdiction conflict appears inevitably
筆者認為，國際民事管轄權積極沖突的構成，應當同時具備以下要件： （ 1 ）當事人就同一訴訟標的在兩個或兩個以上國家的法院提起訴訟； （ 2 ）兩個或兩個以上國家的法院對該同一訴訟標的均具有合格管轄權； （ 3 ）兩個或兩個以上國家的法院均受理同一訴訟案件。Furthermore, it analyzed the conflict in terms of the change of movable real right in the two systems and the effect of explanation and deploitation in terms of inscape of improper benefiting, scope of application and the effect of correcting the benefit imbalance which is caused by improper benefiting towards the system of non - reason of real right, and opened out the intrinsic relations between he system of non - reason of real right and the system of improper benefiting. the fourth part of the paper mainly analyzed our legislation pattern of real right alteration and the attitude towards non - reason of real right action in the field of civil law, and set forth the aim and existing obstacles in transplanting real right action and non - reason theory, and then pointed out, from the judge of theory, there are some factors of real right action in our exiting civil legislation and the biggest obstacle for transplanting the theory lies in the matter of cognition
關於物權行為無因性制度與不當得利制度的比較，主要分析了物權行為無因性在給付不當得利的構成要件、適用范圍等方面的解釋和開拓作用，以及不當得利制度對於物權行為無因性制度所引起的利益失衡的平衡作用，指出物權行為無因性與不當得利之間存在著某種內在聯系，在不承認物權行為無因性原則的立法例中，不當得利請求權處于輔助地位，在適用中多受限制；在以物權行為無因性原則為特徵的立法例中，不當得利制度在理論上具有圓通性，在實務上功能突出，成為救濟物權行為無因性所導致的利益失衡狀態的有效措施。This article on international and domestic recognized the inhabitant standard not yet unifies the present situation has conducted the analysis research, elaborated separately from the natural person and legal person ' s angle on international solves the inhabitant tax revenue jurisdiction conflict principle, thus draws the conclusion, namely because each national stipulation inhabitant taxpayer ' s scope and the constitution condition are different, it is necessary to coordinate each national the legal conflict, and touched on foreign affairs in the tax law to our country about inhabitant ' s definition, legal person aspect and so on inhabitant ' s scope and confirmation standard proposed had the pointed legislation suggestion ; international although has formed avoids because the dual inhabitant status causing the dual taxation the convention, but its implementation still relied on the bilateral international tax revenue agreement and the various countries ' domestic legislation, the various countries ' domestic legislation the inhabitant recognized the decisive function in particular to the international tax law in, therefore our country should take and strengthen in the tax law inhabitant ' s legislation
本文就國際及國內認定居民標準尚未統一的現狀進行了分析研究，從自然人及法人的角度分別闡述了國際上解決居民稅收管轄權沖突的原則，從而得出結論，即由於各個國家規定的居民納稅人的范圍和構成條件不同，有必要協調各個國家的法律沖突，並對我國涉外稅法中關于居民的定義、法人居民的范圍及確認標準等方面提出了有針對性的立法建議；國際間雖已形成避免因雙重居民身份導致雙重征稅的慣例，但其實施仍依賴雙邊國際稅收協定及各國國內立法，尤其是各國國內立法對國際稅法上居民的認定起決定性作用，故我國應重視和加強稅法上居民的立法。
分享友人