締約過失 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [dìyāoguòshī]
締約過失
英文
culpa in contrahendo-
On culpa in contraction liability of the donor in the bestowal contract
贈與合同中贈與人的締約過失責任Fault liability of contracting as an independent civil obligation
論締約過失責任的獨立性The writer recognizes that as well to should include the concordat the occasion, quanta that establish him also infringement not default the square ' s proper avail, non obstinate this fraction the avail and does not occupy the point, and deny their entity but the non possums, for example the corporeal have the minor faults, treaty about body breach of warranty the etc. ultimately is a treaty about the negligence responsibility is an infringement reliance avail, the writer recognize and should include the modern law of contract of proper avail, quanta to have the infringement
最後就是締約過失責任是只侵犯了信賴利益嗎,筆者認為應該包括固有利益,因為現代契約法有侵權法向合同法轉移的情況,其根源就是侵犯的包括固有利益。再次是關于預期違約責任的一些問題,預期違約來源於英美法系,對于預期違約的概念國內有三種,筆者認為它的定義是在合同締結之後至合同履行期到來之前產生的履約危險加以救濟的法律制度。This article is main the range, treaty about of the concordat responsibility negligence responsibility, see to default the responsibility with the returning of concordat the principle make some to study, quanta these subjects all have some arguments, text with a view to pass the search in the academic world and everybody among them of concerning subject company ' s
這篇文章主要就合同責任的范圍,締約過失責任,預期違約責任和合同的歸責原則作一些探討,因為這些問題在學術界都有一些爭論,本文擬通過研究與大家就其中的有關問題商榷一番。首先是合同責任的范圍,很多學者認為是僅僅指違約責任。For the treaty about the responsibility ' s quality, have four kind doctrine, is a deflect to say respectively, and the act of law say, and the direct provision of law say that say with honest repute, and the writer more incline toward the honest repute to say, quanta this is the treaty about negligence responsibility this a special stage solicit of, the parties steer the activity relating to civil law the hour to must have the heart of bona fides the status, other doctrine all some lead long strong, treaty about of occasion, traditional standpoint it is an acknowledge concordat that negligence responsibility establish does not establish, void or reversed occasion
對于締約責任的性質,有四種學說,分別是侵權行為說,法律行為說,法律直接規定說和誠實信用說,筆者更傾向于誠實信用說,因為這是締約過失責任這一特殊階段要求的,當事人進行民事活動時必須具備誠實善良的內心狀態,其他學說都有些牽強。對于締約過失責任成立的場合,傳統的觀點是只承認合同不成立、無效或被撤銷的場合。筆者認為也應包括合同成立的場合,因為他同時也侵犯了非違約方的固有利益,雖然這部分利益不佔重點,但我們不能否認她們的存在,比如標的物有瑕疵,締約人違反保證等。On the independence of liability of culpa in contrahendo
論締約過失責任的獨立性On the concept and nature of culpa in contrahendo
論締約過失責任的概念和性質On damages not for property caused by culpa in contrahendo
締約過失之非財產損害賠償問題探究The donator should compensate the loss of reliance interest arising from the execution of the right of revocation for his breach of contract
任意撤回權的行使雖為法定,但贈與人亦應賠償受贈人因此所遭受的信賴利益損失,且其責任基礎不是一般所認為的締約過失責任而應是違約責任。The answer is positive, because the donors have been endowed the right of withdrawal ( revocation ) according to the stipulation explicitly in modern contract law in china. however, does that meant donors haven ’ t any responsibility for the loss of donee ? if donor should undertake some responsibility, what kind of responsibility it is
本文以現行《合同法》第十一章「贈與合同」中贈與人的任意撤銷權與受贈人的信賴利益沖突為切入點提出問題,介紹兩大法系代表性的兩種解決方案,即以富勒為代表的「信賴法則」和以耶林為代表的「締約過失規則」 。The bearance of contrating fault responsibility and law suiting
締約過失責任的承擔及其法律適用On forms of misfeasance responsibility in contracting
論締約過失責任的責任形式As to the law basic, the thesis analyses it from two main aspects : the foundation of contract law and the foundation of tort law. the foundation of cl is supported by theories of contract - breaking responsibility and misfeasance responsibility in contracting ; the foundation of tl is the civil tort liability and it gives the analysis to the causation and the principle of imputation when the civil tort liability is tenable
對證券交易民事責任的法律根據,本文主要從合同法基礎和侵權法基礎兩方面進行分析,其中,合同法基礎就在於違約民事責任理論和締約過失責任理論,而侵權法基礎則為侵權民事責任理論,並對作為侵權民事責任成立基礎的因果關系和歸責原則進行剖析。At the same time the article also analyzes the novation and the dischargement of liability for wrongs in conclusion of contract. on the theoretical basis of it, the article put forward the principle of good faith as its authoritative foundation, both in essence and in form. it directly stipulates the liability for wrongs in conclusion of contract as an analytic level view of petition
在締約過失責任的理論基礎方面,從實質和形式兩層意義上,本文提出誠實信用原則是締約過失責任的法源性基礎,法律的直接規定是締約過失責任的請求權基礎的層次分析觀。On law issue of contracted unpremeditated responsibility
締約過失責任的法律問題The exploration on unpremeditated fault duty of concluding a treaty on construction
建築活動中締約過失責任的探討After discussing the limitation of actions and the burden of adducing evidence with respect to the contracting fault liability compensation, the article finally gives comments to the contract law of p. r. china regarding its stipulations on the contracting fault liability and analyses the real cases according to the provisions of the contract law of p. r. china for the purpose of improving the level of judiciary in china
並探討了締約過失損害賠償的訴訟時效與舉證責任:最後評析了我國《合同法》中關于締約過失責任的規定,並對照《合同法》的規定對所舉事例進行了分析,以期對我國司法有所裨益。The now law, which is put into use on 1st, oct. 1999, adopted to the framework of the mainland law system, at the same time, it referred to the advanced contract liability regime within the two law systems and " united nation convention on contracts for the international sale of goods ", esp. the liability for wrongs in conclusion of contract, anticipatory breach liability and post - contract liability has a significant meaning in improving the liability ' system of our country
一九九九年十月一日正式實施的《中華人民共和國合同法》 (以下簡稱《合同法》 ) ,在繼受大陸法基本框架的同時,又借鑒和吸收了兩大法系及《聯合國國際貨物銷售合同公約》中的一些先進的合同責任制度,尤其是締約過失責任、預期違約責任和后契約責任的納入,既是對我國合同責任制度的創新,同時對於我國合同責任體系的完善更具有重要的意義。The theory of fault in the process of contacting and negotiation for contract was mentioned by germen jurits rudolf vou jhering in 1861. its meaning is when one party ' s civil wrong broke the statutory duty of reasonable care arisen from the principle of good faith, during the process of contacting and negotiation for contract, and cause other party ' s interests or reliance interest damages, the former must compensate for the later ' s loss. statutory obligation for fault in the process of contacting and negotiation for contract is different from that for breach of contract and that for tortuous acts
本文主要從以下幾個方面對締約過失責任理論、法律制度方面需完善的問題進行探討:一、對締約過失責任的概念和構成進行探討:二、對締約過失責任中缺失的對精神損害救濟的法律規定問題進行全面、系統的分析、論述;三、論述了締約過失責任與違約責任並存和競合的情形,在合同法上應允許締約過失責任與違約責任的並存、競合,充分保護權利人的合法利益;四、對締約過失責任法律制度應注重對締約過失行為的監控問題進行探討。On the guarantee of flaws of things, leistungst ? rungsrecht and culpa in contrahendo
履行障礙法與締約過失責任分享友人