衡平上的權利 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [héngpíngshàngdequánlì]
衡平上的權利
英文
equatible right- 衡 : Ⅰ名詞1 (秤桿) the graduated arm of a steelyard2 (稱重量的器具) weighing apparatus3 (姓氏) a...
- 平 : Ⅰ形容詞1 (沒有高低凹凸 不頃斜) flat; level; even; smooth 2 (高度相同; 不相上下) on the same l...
- 上 : 上名詞[語言學] (指上聲) falling-rising tone
- 的 : 4次方是 The fourth power of 2 is direction
- 權 : Ⅰ名詞1 [書面語] (秤錘) counterpoise; weight (of a steelyard)2 (權力) power; authority 3 (...
- 權利 : rightinterest
-
The social purpose of copyright law can be generalized as equilibrating the above relations of interest
著作權法的目的,在於使上述各利益達到大致平衡的狀態。For inclusion in a document that establishes or is evidence of any legal or equitable right or interest or legal liability that is not trivial, e. g. in documents that establish an individual s right of ownership of a flat
為了加入用以確立或證明任何法律或衡平法上的權利或利益或任何法律責任的文件內,而該等權利或利益或法律責任的性質並非是輕微的,For inclusion in a document that establishes or is evidence of any legal or equitable right or interest or legal liability that is not trivial, e. g. in documents that establish an individual s right of ownership of a flat. do not collect an id card number just to safeguard against a trivial loss
為了加入用以確立或證明任何法律或衡平法上的權利或利益或任何法律責任的文件內,而該等權利或利益或法律責任的性質並非是輕微的,例如用以確立個人的物業權益的文件。Furthermore, it analyzed the conflict in terms of the change of movable real right in the two systems and the effect of explanation and deploitation in terms of inscape of improper benefiting, scope of application and the effect of correcting the benefit imbalance which is caused by improper benefiting towards the system of non - reason of real right, and opened out the intrinsic relations between he system of non - reason of real right and the system of improper benefiting. the fourth part of the paper mainly analyzed our legislation pattern of real right alteration and the attitude towards non - reason of real right action in the field of civil law, and set forth the aim and existing obstacles in transplanting real right action and non - reason theory, and then pointed out, from the judge of theory, there are some factors of real right action in our exiting civil legislation and the biggest obstacle for transplanting the theory lies in the matter of cognition
關於物權行為無因性制度與不當得利制度的比較,主要分析了物權行為無因性在給付不當得利的構成要件、適用范圍等方面的解釋和開拓作用,以及不當得利制度對於物權行為無因性制度所引起的利益失衡的平衡作用,指出物權行為無因性與不當得利之間存在著某種內在聯系,在不承認物權行為無因性原則的立法例中,不當得利請求權處于輔助地位,在適用中多受限制;在以物權行為無因性原則為特徵的立法例中,不當得利制度在理論上具有圓通性,在實務上功能突出,成為救濟物權行為無因性所導致的利益失衡狀態的有效措施。Part iiilegal issues upon the reform of toll and tax in countryside this part is concentrated to show six problems that the reform of toll and tax in countryside is to be up against and is to be peremptorily settled as following : the first one, in the confirming of agricultural tax, it is very difficult to protect the farmer ' s rights fairly because of unscientific of the evidence at assessment, highly of tax rate, and the absence of law and statute correlatively ; the second one, on the tax levying, there lack of legal systems that is to supervise and run, especially lack of law and statute which lead to collect agricultural special tax canonically ; the third one, the reform of toll and tax in countryside extrudes unbalance burden among farmers and countries, and lead to unevenly between subject of tax payment, which breaches the legal rule of balanceable tax ; the fourth one, the reform of toll and tax in countryside faces the danger that farmers " burden tends to rebound because of weakly carry through legal rule on tax statutory and absent of law and statute correlatively ; the fifth one, the reform of toll and tax in countryside affects the finance and revenue - expenditure auditing of the grass roots and father affects the grass roots to raise fee upon public construction and education, as a result, there ' s more charge that is out of law, the monocracy of grass roots " finance ought to be carry out ; the sixth one, legal measures connect with the reform of toll and tax in countryside in dire need of to be built, which mainly conclude legal system that adjust country social security, country compulsory education and country debt
第三部分? ?農村稅費改革的法律課題集中展示了農村稅費改革所面臨且亟待解決的六大法律問題。即:其一,在確定農業稅上,計稅依據不科學、稅率偏高、相關法律規范缺失,無法平等保護農民的合法權益;其二,在農村稅收的徵收上,缺乏行之有效的法律監督和運行機制,尤其是農業特產稅的徵收缺乏保障據實徵收的法律規范;其三,稅費改革凸顯農民之間、農村之間的負擔不均,使納稅主體的權利義務失衡,有悖稅負均衡的法律原則;其四,由於稅收法定主義沒有得到有效貫徹,規制農民負擔反彈方面的法律法規缺位,致使農村稅費改革潛伏著農民負擔反彈的風險;其五,稅費改革影響基層組織的財政收支,進而影響鄉村公益事業建設及教育經費的籌措,引發稅外亂收費沉渣泛起,基層財政體製法治化勢在必行;其六,與稅費改革相關的配套法律措施巫待構建,主要是農村社會保障法律體系、鄉村義務教育和鄉村債務疏導的法律支撐魚待構建與完善。第四部分一一農村稅費改革與相關法律制度的構建基於上一部分提出的法律問題,力圖構築農村稅費改革的法律框架並提出相應對策。The balance between the private right of the trade secret owner and the public interest is a primary rule which determines the proneness of the trade secret legislation. thus, the law takes a limited protection for trade secret
商業秘密保護在立法的價值取向上就以商業秘密權利人的私權與社會公共利益的平衡為指導原則,對商業秘密採取有限的保護措施。At first, the author expatiates on the major function of constitution in the traditional german theory, then introduces the debate in this problem of the german scholars from the 1950 ’ s. after this, the author stresses the attitude of the federal constitutional court which points out the theory of indirect effect and the manner to apply the theory
在此部分,首先闡述了在德國傳統理論中,憲法基本權利條款的主要功能,隨后介紹了德國學界自上世紀50年代以來對此問題的爭議與討論,然後,重點介紹了德國聯邦憲法法院在此問題上所持的態度,指出權益平衡乃是憲法法院適用間接影響理論的實質方式。“ creditor ” includes a general creditor, a secured creditor, a lien creditor and any representative of creditors, including an assignee for the benefit of creditors, a trustee in bankruptcy, a receiver in equity and an executor or administrator of an insolvent debtor ' s or assignor ' s estate
「債權人」包括普通債權人、獲得擔保的債權人、留置債權人和債權人的任何代表人,包括債權人利益的受讓人、破產的受託人、衡平法上的接收人和破產債權人或出讓人的不動產的執行人或管理人。To balance the right to prosecute of the state to realize the procedural justice, c. to make the action more effective to guarantee the highly skillful and specialized criminal proceedings be smoothly carried out, e. to expressly and legislatively regulate the concrete system for lawyers to protect the legal interests of the suspects and accused and to highlight the concept on the protection of their legal interests
賦予並確保律師調查權具有以下幾個方面的價值:有助於查清案情,實現實體公正;平衡國家追訴權,實現程序公正;提高訴訟效率,保障高度技術化、專門化的刑事訴訟程序的順利進行;從立法上明文規定辯護律師維護犯罪嫌疑人、被告人合法權益的具體制度,可以從觀念上強化保護犯罪嫌疑人、被告人合法權益的思想意識。However, the existence of various rights conflicts increases its application difficulty in its concrete application process. although some western countries have made specialized law on the base of theoretical research on environment injunction, some difficulties exist in the course of weighing the specific rights. so, this article mades systematic theoretical analysis and judicial practice demonstration on how to balance the conflicts as the core of this topic after the basic study about environment infringement and environment injunction. the application of environmental injunction should also introduce mechanisms to measure the interests of western countries in our country, the article proposes we should have the efficiency and justice as a measure of the baseline, and should be firstly applied to achieve a settlement of the conflict in the course of weighing specific interest
環境侵害排除,作為環境糾紛解決中的一種民事救濟方式,在各國環境侵害責任體系中佔有越來越重要的地位,然而在其具體適用過程中存在的種種權利沖突又增加其適用的難度,盡管西方的一些國家在長期理論研究的基礎上已經有了關于環境侵害排除方面的專門法律規定,但在具體衡平權利沖突各方的利益關系時仍存在種種困難,因此,本文在分析環境侵害及侵害排除等基本理論問題的基礎上,以環境侵害排除中權利沖突的平衡為視角作為本文論題的核心,進行系統的理論分析及司法實踐的論證。I, through comparing the research approach to analyze with the case, from culture, legal culture, legal changes and lead legal culture into meaning in which the economic law study set out of culture, on the basis that the theory is analyzed, particular background and reality formed and developed on the basis of the economic law, study and regard power culture and right culture as the economic law culture of two major key elements among them from the standing of angle of legal culture. from the meaning of the culture of economic law at the same time, necessity and feasibility of studying in culture of economic law, economic law characteristic modernity and national characteristic of culture, economic law culture with modern to rule by law civilized angle set about, carry on economic law analysis of culture ; secondly, certain difference exists in formulation and development of chinese and western economic law culture, the development of the culture of western economic law is shown as the cultural transition to power culture of the right rotates. with germany and historical retrospect and review, carry on real example investigate and combine western law sociology ideological trend research and western economic law culture of development, economic law of u. s. a., i inner link, the essence around the culture of eastern economic law is the power culture at the same time, its form of expression is confucian culture, the course of development is shown as the transformation to right culture of power culture, and golden mean culture is the inside information of china ' s economic law culture
筆者從文化、法律文化、法律文化的沖突與變遷以及經濟法制度的法律文化土壤的思路進行研究,在理論分析的基礎上,基於經濟法形成與發展的特定背景與現實,闡釋經濟法以社會本位為價值取向、以權利與權力均衡為主旨、以平衡協調為內核、以人為終極關懷的內涵;經濟法文化的路徑考察由經濟法文化演進與國家角色的變遷、經濟法嬗變中的平衡協調精神、經濟法文化孕育中的社會本位思潮、經濟法文化熏陶下的經濟法制度催生四個層面展開;經濟法文化的特性表現為現代性和民族性,經濟法文化與現代法治文明的關聯涵蓋兩個方面,挖掘發揚傳統法文化中的合理因素、警惕傳統法文化中不合理因素的侵蝕;由於中西經濟法文化的產生與發展存在一定的差異,西方經濟法文化的發展表現為權利文化向權力文化的過渡轉型,筆者以德國和美國經濟法發展的歷史性回顧與反思進行實證考察並結合西方的法社會學思潮研究與西方經濟法文化的內在聯系,同時圍繞東方經濟法文化進行探析,其表現形式是儒家文化,發展的過程表現為權力文化向權利文化的轉移,其中中庸文化是中國經濟法文化的底蘊。In theory, our country should define parole as one of the criminals " right, which can be regard as the proper balance between defending our society and guaranteeing the criminals " right
理論上,我國應當將假釋定位為罪犯的一項權利,其價值取向應當是在防衛社會和保障罪犯權利上的妥善平衡。This is because, the fact carrying out the run the country by law can solve the problem of the relative equilibrium between the government power and masses rights, however, it bounds a lot in real practice, especially could be restricted by china ' s historic and cultural customs, the legal tradition, the current policies and other aspects. and during the process of carrying out run the country by law, it also lacks the effective interaction between the government and the masses, and the mainly reason for this problem is that the masses are lacking of the correct understanding of the government power
這是因為,雖然推行「依法治國」事實上可以解決政府權力與民眾權利的相對平衡問題,但是在現實操作中受到諸多條件限制,尤其是受我國歷史文化習俗、法制傳統及現行政策等制約,在推行「依法治國」中缺少政府與民眾的有效「互動」 ,而出現這個問題的主要原因是民眾對政府權力缺乏正確的認識。Patent law has formed the mechanism that balances the different interest of the society, such as the patent right ca n ' t be abused etc. in fact, gene sequence patent extend industrial circles " monopoly right to bring them more interest
就一國內部來講,傳統專利法在調整利益關繫上的實踐中已形成了一種衡平機制,如對基礎理論不能壟斷、獲得的專利壟斷權不能超出其做出的貢獻、不能濫用專利權、對技術的進一步的開發、研究不能壟斷等。The statutory right of marine insurers to rescind contracts with a special eye to balancing the interests of parties of marine insurance contract
從平衡保險雙方利益的角度看中國海上保險人的法定解除權It aims to bring up to date china ' s laws and regulations of compensation for casualties at sea, so that they would better fit in with the fast - changing social, economical and legal situations in china after its accession to the world trade organization. it attempts to seek out, to be specific, a way of compensation as sound as possible which would maximally protect the legitimate rights of both the owners of vessels and the victims, hopefully by satisfactorily balancing the interests of the two parties. the ultimate purpose of this paper therefore, is to provide certain theoretical support for modifying relevant laws and regulations in this realm in china
研究的目的在於適應我國法律法規不斷完善的新形勢,使海上人身傷亡損害賠償的法律規定與各相關法律規定接軌,與我國加入wto后的新形勢接軌;並根據我國的國情,探求一種科學合理的海上人身傷亡損害賠償辦法,盡可能地找到一個海上運輸業和受害者兩者利益間的平衡點,使海上運輸業和受害者的合法權利得到更加充分的保護;進一步研究海上人身傷亡損害賠償的法律理論基礎,為進一步修改我國海上人身傷亡損害賠償的有關法律提供依據。As one kind of company ’ s laws, the purpose of establishing and running effectively the exceptional exclusion system of the voting rights of corporation lies in to be to controlling shareholder, related shareholder and related director from betraying company voting rights exercising rule improper act in the essence carry on the structure with appropriate system design, in order to correct unbalanced shareholder ’ s interests relationship, realize company voting rights definitely equal to essence equal transformation from a formal one really, and by this with activating the system of the general shareholders meetings and the board of directors, making resolutions of the general shareholders meetings or the board of directors possess legal, just, reasonable and effective foundation of voting rights
作為一種公司法律制度,公司表決權例外排除制度的創建與有效運行,其目的在於以妥當的制度設計對控股股東、關聯股東、關聯董事離叛公司表決權行使規則之內在實質的不當行為進行規制,以矯正失衡的股東利益關系,真正實現公司表決權從形式上的絕對平等向實質上的近乎平等轉化,並藉此以激活股東(大)會制度和董事會制度,使股東(大)會、董事會決議具備合法、公正、合理以及有效的表決權基礎。The approach to analyze the economic value of exhaustion of exclusive right system and the efficiency of intellectuality property right system. intellectuality property right is a monopoly, and monopoly leads to deficiency. it costs law a lot in the protection of the monopoly status of the fight owner
從法理學上分析權利用盡理論的正義價值,秩序價值,通過權利用盡制度,合理分配知識產權人和相關權利主體之間的權利和義務,以確立知識產權的正義準則,通過平衡知識產品交易各方的利益以實現正義秩序,實現了法律的最終價值目標。On the basis of the research on the connotation, the theoretical basis and the relevant systems of several countries, this article advances four fundamental principles for the establishment of prohibition of business strife system in china - legal interests equity, rights consistent with obligation, mitigating discrimination treatment and litigation remedy. furthermore, this article proposes five suggestions, i. e. to change absolute prohibition into relative prohibition, to unify the subject scope, to define the term limit, to define the extent of the duty and to perfect the legal liability system
本文在研究董事競業禁止的內涵及其理論依據、考察相關國家董事競業禁止制度的基礎上,有針對性地提出了確立我國董事競業禁止制度的四項基本原則? ?法益衡平原則、權利義務相一致原則、淡化差別待遇原則和可訴性原則,並進而設計了完善我國董事競業禁止制度的五條具體意見? ?改董事競業的絕對禁止為相對禁止、統一董事競業禁止義務的主體范圍、明確規定競業禁止義務的時間界限、明晰董事競業的外延范圍和完善法律責任體系。It should both protect and restrict trade - secret right. restriction upon trade - secret right is based on guarantee of individual legitimate interest as well as social public interest. actually, it is to achieve balance among monopolized interest, individual legitimate interest and social public one
對商業秘密權利人的權利進行限制,是基於保障其他社會個體正當利益與社會公共利益的考慮,實際上就是為了平衡商業秘密權利人的壟斷利益與其他個體正當利益及社會公共利益之間的關系。分享友人