訴訟假扣押 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [sòngjiǎkòu]
訴訟假扣押 英文
security for claim
  • : 動詞1. (說給人) tell; relate; inform 2. (傾吐) complain; accuse 3. (控告) appeal to; resort to
  • : 動詞1. (打官司) bring a case to court 2. (爭辯是非) dispute; argue
  • : 假名詞1. (按照規定不工作或不學習的時間; 假期) holiday; vacation 2. (經過批準暫時不工作或不學習的時間; 休假) leave of absence; furlough
  • : Ⅰ動詞1 (把財物交給對方作為保證) give as security; mortgage; pawn; pledge 2 (扣留) detain; tak...
  • 訴訟 : [法律] lawsuit; litigation; legal action; judicial action; action
  1. Securing judgment procedure is to protect the legal rights of creditor, under that aim, there also exist two direct aim, one is safeguard the execute of the judicial addict made in the future, the other is to avoid the unredemptive damages chapter 3 the type of civil securing judgment procedure this chapter researches into the type of civil securing judgment procedure and relevant legal basis in main countries, including the arrest and einstweligeverfugung in germany and japan, the juger en refere iprocedure and qrdanance sur requite in france, attachment, temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction in u. s, pre - judgement rremedies in britain, and property preservation and advance execution in china the civil securing judgment procedure system of france, u. s. and britain don t meet the situation and tradition custom of china, while the civil securing judgment procedure system of german and japan has deficiency the conclusion of this chapter is, we should reasonably reform current civil securing judgment procedure system of china, reconstruction the dual civil securing judgment procedure system under the division of property preservation and action preservaition chaptei4 court has the power of jurisdiction this chapter researches into the court which has jurisdiction to different kinds of securing

    筆者認為,民事保全程序存在審理階段的保全程序和執行階段的程序,是特別的程序和執行程序兼容;民事保全請求權屬于廣義上的權;民事保全權屬于裁判權(司法權)和行政權並存;民事保全程序應當體現迅速原則、全面保護雙方當事人;權益原則、程序正當原則、保全措施的標的有限原則;民事保全程序的總目的是為了保護債權人的合法權益,其直接目的有二:一是保障將來執行文書的強制執行,二是:避免將來無法挽回的損失。第三章民事保全的類型本章對各主要國家關於民事保全的類型及其依據逐一作了論述:德國和日本的處分、法國的緊急審理程序和依申請作出裁定的程序、美國的, 、一。和中間禁令、英國的臨時性救濟措施、我國的財產保全和先予執行。
分享友人