評定裁判員 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [píngdìngcáipànyuán]
評定裁判員
英文
ringside judge- 評 : Ⅰ動詞1. （評論; 批評） comment; criticize; review 2. （評判） judge; appraise Ⅱ名詞（姓氏） a surname
- 定 : Ⅰ形容詞1 （平靜; 穩定） calm; stable 2 （已經確定的; 不改變的） fixed; settled; established Ⅱ動詞...
- 裁 : Ⅰ動詞1 （用刀、剪等把片狀物分成若干部分; 剪裁; 割裂） cut （paper cloth etc ） into parts 2 （把...
- 判 : Ⅰ動詞1 （分開; 分辨） distinguish; discriminate 2 （評定） judge; decide 3 （判決） sentence; con...
- 員 : 員名詞1. （指工作或學習的人） a person engaged in some field of activity 2. （指團體或組織中的成員） member Ⅱ量詞（用於武將）
- 評定 : judge; pass judgment on; evaluate; appraise; assess; rate
- 裁判 : 1 [法律] （判決和裁定） judgment 2 [體育] （評判） act as referee; referee3 [體育] （裁判員） jud...
-
With an eye to the systematic of judicial interpretation, the inherent requirement of judicial independence, the nature of criminal adjudication, the accordance of power and responsibili ty, and the semanteme of judicial independence, the author finds out that the principle of " the people ' s courts shall exercise judicial power independently " shall also include the personal independence of individual judges. on this basis, the author reviews the adjudicative power endowed with the adjudicatory committee by law and holds that this provision has its historical significance, yet its application in today brings more malpractice than benefits. its application goes against the justness, the quality and the efficiency of the administration of justice, and goes against the realization of other important functions of the adjudicatory committee, the improvement of the skills and abilities of the judges
在此基礎上，筆者對我國法律賦予審判委員會實質意義上的裁判權的規定進行了評析，認為，審判委員會行使裁判權，雖然有其存在的歷史原因，但在現在已經是弊大於利，它不利於司法公正，不利於保證案件質量，不利於提高訴訟效率，不利於提高訴訟效益，不利於審判委員會其他職能的正常發揮，不利於提高法官素質，理論界和實務界提出的種種保留審判委員會的裁判權的主張，並不能克服審判委員會行使裁判權的弊端，因此，應當取消審判委員會的裁判權（不是廢除審判委員會） ，法定的裁判者只能是負責個案審判的法官和人民陪審員。The court of first instance dismissed the appeal by a tax inspector of the inland revenue department against his conviction of accepting 10, 000 from a former ird assistant assessor and offering 5, 000 to an employee of an industrial company for referring a public accountant firm, but ordered that his original jail term of 14 months was reduced to 12 months
原訟法庭駁回一名稅務局稅務督察申請推翻判罪的上訴，但將其刑期由十四個月減至十二個月。該名稅務督察，接受一名稅務局前助理評稅主任一萬元及向一名實業有限公司職員提供五千元，作為向該公司介紹一間執業會計師樓的報酬，曾被裁定罪名成立。
分享友人