贈與合同 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [zèngyǔgětóng]
贈與合同 英文
a donation contract
  • 贈 : 動詞（贈送） give as a present; present as a gift
  • 合 : 合量詞（容量單位） ge, a unit of dry measure for grain （=1 decilitre）
  • 贈與 : favour; gift; grant贈與合同 contract of gift; 贈與人 donor; 贈與稅 [法律] gift tax; 贈與證書 deed of gift
  1. On culpa in contraction liability of the donor in the bestowal contract

    贈與合同中贈與人的締約過失責任
  2. It is donative person gives his belongings free suffer give a person, suffer give a person to express to accept donative contract

    是贈與人將自己的財產無償給予受贈人，受贈人表示接受贈與的合同。
  3. The right of revocation relates to the consensual characteristic of donation contract closely, and it is the remedy to relieve the burden of the donator after the conclusion of contract

    贈與人的任意撤回權與贈與合同的諾成性故關，是旨在彌補贈與被立法確認為諾成合同后對贈與人要求過苛的弊端而設計的救濟性手段。
  4. A gift contract is a contract whereby the donor conveys his property to the donee without reward and the donee manifests his acceptance of the gift

    第一百八十五條贈與合同是贈與人將自己的財產無償給予受贈人，受贈人表示接受贈與的合同。
  5. In order to protect the benefit of donee, contract law regulates donation contract as promissory and unilateral contract without compensation, meanwhile contract law endows the donor with free revocation right for the merit of equity and justice

    依《中華人民共和國合同法》 （以下簡稱《合同法》 ） ，贈與合同為諾成合同（有爭議） ，單務、無償合同。
  6. In the case of a gift contract the nature of which serves public interests or fulfills a moral obligation, such as disaster relief, poverty relief, etc., or a gift contract which has been notarized, if the donor fails to deliver the gift property, the donee may require delivery

    第一百八十八條具有救災、扶貧等社會公益、道德義務性質的贈與合同或者經過公證的贈與合同，贈與人不交付贈與的財產的，受贈人可以要求交付。
  7. The answer is positive, because the donors have been endowed the right of withdrawal ( revocation ) according to the stipulation explicitly in modern contract law in china. however, does that meant donors haven ’ t any responsibility for the loss of donee ? if donor should undertake some responsibility, what kind of responsibility it is

    本文以現行《合同法》第十一章「贈與合同」中贈與人的任意撤銷權與受贈人的信賴利益沖突為切入點提出問題，介紹兩大法系代表性的兩種解決方案，即以富勒為代表的「信賴法則」和以耶林為代表的「締約過失規則」 。
  8. However, if the donation is not for charity or without legal notarial acts, the loss of reasonable reliance of donee couldn ’ t be relieved. when donation contact is established, if the donee endows enough and reasonable reliance on promise of donor and has got loss of reliance, could the donor withdraw his promise without any reason before the transfer of property right

    《合同法》第一百八十六條第一款，允許贈與人隨時食言（贈與人的法定任意撤銷權）體現了鼓勵並保護善良贈與人的立法意圖，然而贈與人的法定任意撤銷權卻可能與受贈人對贈與的合理信賴發生沖突。
  9. Legal probe into rescinding the contract of gift

    對贈與合同撤銷的法律思考
  10. The previous paragraph does not apply to any gift contract the nature of which serves public interests or fulfills a moral obligation, such as disaster relief, poverty relief, etc., or any gift contract which has been notarized

    具有救災、扶貧等社會公益、道德義務性質的贈與合同或者經過公證的贈與合同，不適用前款規定。
  11. Analysis of several problems of constracts of donation

    贈與合同若干問題探析
  12. Talk about the cancel right wantonly of the grant contract

    關于贈與合同任意撤銷權的探討
  13. On repealing right of donating cnotract

    淺談贈與合同的撤銷權
  14. Discussion on practical problems of right of cancellation in the contract of gift

    贈與合同撤銷權實務問題探討
  15. The aim of this paper is to research the theoretical basis, specific measures and relative policies in order to perfect the property tax system of our country. through describing the current situations of our property tax system and analyzing its features and its problems and causes, we should build a scientific, tight and complex property tax system. meanwhile, we must follow our real conditions to use the international experience and combine the request “ levying a unified and standardized property tax ” in the 3d party sixteenth

    本文從我國財產稅制的現狀和存在問題出發，通過對國外財產稅體系的描述，在借鑒國際經驗的國情基礎上，就改進和完善我國財產稅制進行了理論及征管實踐研究，主張以物業稅為主導，合理歸並財產稅收體系中的現有稅種，適時開征遺產稅與贈與稅，同時提升財產稅收的立法層次並適度分權，建立完善財產評估制度等配套措施，在效率優先、兼顧公平的原則下，充分發揮財產稅的財政職能和公平財富的職能。
  16. On the basis of the foregoing, the author discovers the similarities of the provisions of two countries : donation contract ( promise ) is generally irrevocable, charitable subscription is enforceable ; when circumstances change, donor may refuse to perform the obligations under donation contract under certain circumstances or is excused from contract liability. this paper tries to seek legal culture behind the provisions

    在此基礎上，筆者發現兩國法律規定的相似之處：一般的贈與合同（允諾）贈與人可以任意撤銷贈與，慈善性捐助合同（允諾）的贈與人則不享有任意撤銷權；當情勢發生變更，在特定情形下，賦予贈與人拒絕履行贈與義務的權利或者免除合同責任。
  17. Answer : following behavior inspects real estate of of the same branch of a family to make over : ( 1 ) serves as with estate contributive establish legal person company with other ; ( 2 ) one party provides land access, other one party or with all possible means estate of bankroll joint development is divided with property right ; ( when 3 ) buys amalgamative perhaps company, estate move is new obligee all ; ( 4 ) with estate pay a debt in kind or by labour ; ( a between other perhaps organization estate attune of 5 ) state - owned company unplug ; ( between 6 ) blame parents and children, the estate between the spouse is donative behavior

    答：下列行為視同房地產轉讓： （ 1 ）以房地產作為出資與他人成立法人企業的； （ 2 ）一方提供土地使用權，另一方或多方提供資金合作開發房地產並以產權分成的； （ 3 ）收購或者合併企業時，房地產轉移為新的權利人所有的； （ 4 ）以房地產抵債的； （ 5 ）國有企業之間或者其他組織之間的房地產調拔； （ 6 ）非父母與子女之間、配偶之間的房地產贈與行為。
  18. Firstly, the paper retrospects the development of eso and tries to probe into the theoretical field : the explanation of it ' s definition, the conclusion of it ' s characters, the comparison of eso and other stock inspiration system, followed by the analysis of it ' s theoretical basis and incentive effect ; meanwhile, the paper probes into the realistic situations of eso in usa and china in order to seek the regulation and draw the advantages and disadvantages ; to this part, the paper takes the following four items as the main barriers to eso ' s implementation in china : the over restriction of current law system, the low efficiency of the market, the poor corporate governance structure and a lack of a reasonable performance index system, and elaborately analyze the impacts of the obstacles on eso ; after the analysis made above, the paper gets down to taking some methods to solve the problems in accordance with the characteristic of the barriers. as far as the internal defects of the mechanism are concerned, the paper begins with the scientifically design of the key components, studying the aspects of bestowal, change, loss, the executive method and the executive time. then the paper focuses on designing a performance index system which is an essential part of eso, introducing the bsc to improve the present performance index system, under the reasonable guidelines resigning it at both the levels of company ' s and employee ' s levels. finally, as regards how to perfect the outside surrounding of eso, the thesis makes some suggestion

    本文首先回顧了股票期權制在國內外的發展及較為詳盡的分析了股票期權制度的相關理論：闡述了其涵義，特徵，理論基礎，激勵效應並於其他幾個較易混淆的股權激勵機製作逐一的比較，以進一步澄清人們對其的錯誤認識；同時，對股票期權制在美國和我國的現狀進行深入的實證研究，探求其內在規律，在肯定其成果時指出其不足；至此，筆者認為，我國上市公司要推行股票期權制度將主要面臨以下四類障礙：公司治理結構不完善、市場有效性差、現行法規體系不完善及缺乏客觀的業績考評指標體系，並詳細分析了各類障礙的現狀及對股票期權制的負面影響；在此基礎上，針對各類障礙的不同性質，著手探討消除這些障礙的措施：對于股票期權制內部的缺陷，本文先對各個關鍵要素進行科學設計，系統的剖析了贈與、變更、喪失、執行方式、股票來源等技術性問題，再以大量篇幅研究了如何構建出一套與實施股票期權制相配套的業績考核指標體系，引進平衡計分卡的思想對國內現有的指標體系加以改進，以一組合理的評價原則為指導，從公司及員工個人業績考評兩個層面上來設計該指標體系。
  19. Rights conflict between donor and donee has provided a good point for legal study and research, this paper just starts form that and consists of four parts, which are summarized as follows : in the first part, i focus on the reliance interest in donation contract. firstly, i do my utmost to analyze and explain the similarities and differences between reliance interests, expect interest and restitution interest, which obviously should be the first job before discussing the reliance interest in donation contract

    分析兩種解決方案的共性與個性，做出最優化的價值選擇;結合贈與合同單務、無償的法律特徵，分析贈與物移轉對贈與合同效力的影響;探討贈與合同中雙方的權利配置;確定合理信賴的判斷標準;論述贈與合同中信賴利益賠償責任之構成要件及信賴利益賠償之范圍。
  20. For example, promises that are purely gifts are not considered enforceable because the personal satisfaction the grantor of the promise may receive from the act of giving is normally not considered adequate consideration

    比如，許諾贈與禮物的行為就不是一個可強制執行的合同，因為贈與者從贈與行為中得到的個人滿足感在法律上並不認為是一個充分的對價。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書