輸注于體表 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [shūzhùyútǐbiǎo]
輸注于體表
英文
transport to the body surface-
Within the range of traditional epistemology, because knowledge is thought as objective, value - neutraled, teacher and student take the knowledge in class as truth, since truth is unchangeable, therefore, the essential task of teaching is to convey the knowledge in class, teaching model is represented by the input of objective knowledge, the relation of teacher and student is that of instructor and learner, under the influence of the above statements, teaching evaluation of that time had the following characteristics and in terms of denotation, teaching evaluation equals teaching measurement ; in terms of function, teaching evaluation is represented by social guidance ; in terms of method, teaching evaluation is characterized by empirical feature, etc. the deficiency are represented as follows : because teaching evaluation equals, teaching measurement, and the objects of teaching evaluation is measurable, in that case " value " is excluded ; the concerns of teaching evaluation is laid on the objective knowledge, but not subjects of teaching ; thus made the relation of teaching subjects and objects upside down, the objects of evaluation subjectivity is the knowledge that students learn and grasp, students are neither the evaluating subjectivity nor evaluating objectivity, but are totally suspended in the process of teaching evaluation, not take the all - rounded development of students as the object of evaluation ; in terms of evaluation method itself, there is still much room for improvement
在傳統認識論視野中，由於人們將知識視為客觀的、價值中立的，教師和學生都將課程知識等同於真理，而真理是不能改變，也不需要改變的。因此，教學的核心任務就是正確地傳遞和掌握課程知識，教學的方式則以客觀知識的灌輸為主，教師與學生僅僅是知識的傳遞者與學習者… …在上述影響下，該時期的教學評價呈現出如下特點與不足：從內涵上講，教學評價等於教學測量；從功能上講，教學評價呈現出一種社會導向的功能；從方法上講，教學評價體現出實證化的持點等。其不足則表現為：由於教學評價等同於教學測量，並認為教學評價的對象是可以被測量的，從而把「價值」排除在外；教學評價所關注的是作為客體的知識，而不是人，這就使得教學評價的主客體關系本末倒置，評價主體所要評價的對象是學生所要學習和掌握的知識，學生既不是評價主體也不是評價客體，而是完全地被懸空于教學評價過程之中；從評價方法本身來看，也存在著諸多不足。And from the practice side the paper tries to draw the concl usion through comparing the contents of senior middle school entrance examination with that of college entrance examination, so as to find the differences between them and look for the reason why they bring in the cohesion problem, we assumpt that too easy of the senior middle school entrance examination, text - centred, little focus on language - using ability, are the main factors that lead to the incoherence. then the paper shows the different parts that ca n ' t connect with each other in the incoherence problem, and furthermore it tries to inquire into some practical ways of solving it from the angel of testing. and besides, the paper also appeals to the society for the necessity of reforming the senior school entrance examination, and meantime appeals to our middle school language teacher, never just cast their eyes only upon tests, but also the cohesion of students " permanent development
為了保證本文的科學務實，文中多處通過對比分析，定性分析等研究方法，具體剖析二者不銜接方面之所在，最終得出結論：由於中考試題的簡單，以教材為中心，不注重分析問題，解決問題等能力的考察，只圍繞課本中原封未動的知識來變換題型，進而導致初中英語教學過于強調知識的準確性，而忽略了只有通過廣泛閱讀大量語言材料，不斷輸入新的語言信息才能生成的閱讀能力以及其他語言運用能力的培養，造成初中為高中在能力方面鋪墊過少，高一學生沒有具備進入高中學習所必備的相關能力等不銜接問題；而高考測試注重閱讀能力等綜合語言能力考察的導向確保了高中英語教學從起始階段就以培養閱讀能力、搜集、整理、分析、綜合各種語言信息的能力為中心等綜合語言能力為中心，由此推出初高中英語教學的不銜接問題從初中既已形成，而在高中教學中表現得尤為突出。
分享友人