重癥度分類 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [zhòngzhēngdùfēnlèi]
重癥度分類
英文
pathologicindexrating- 重 : 重Ⅰ名詞（重量; 分量） weight Ⅱ動詞（重視） lay [place put] stress on; place value upon; attach im...
- 癥 : 癥名詞（疾病） disease; illness
- 度 : 度動詞[書面語] （推測; 估計） surmise; estimate
- 分 : 分Ⅰ名詞1. （成分） component 2. （職責和權利的限度） what is within one's duty or rights Ⅱ同 「份」Ⅲ動詞[書面語] （料想） judge
- 類 : Ⅰ名1 （許多相似或相同的事物的綜合; 種類） class; category; kind; type 2 （姓氏） a surname Ⅱ動詞...
-
This study is a research to the schizophrene with and without violent behavior. it takes the mmpi for the personality and the bprs for the disease types and degrees
本研究對有無暴力行為的精神分裂癥患者進行對照，以mmpi作為測量人格的工具，以bprs作為區別癥狀類型和疾病嚴重程度的工具。After we have a superficial realization through comparatively studying legislation example of different countries and zones, this thesis begin to probe into me rule ' s principal and theory basis. stability of the decisions and respect the procedure are two principals that must be followed defending stability of the decisions is beneficial to defend stability of law relations that are caused by decision of shareholders, defend the deal safe, promote the efficiency of the companies. respecting the procedure is beneficial to present the value of the procedure, guarantee the rights and interests of shareholders from the procedure. theory basis of deciding grounds of action and dividing the kinds of action make up theory basis of the rule of rescuing laws on decision of shareholders. the final define of grounds of action that breaking the law and the constitution of company is decided by the nature of company law and the nature of constitution of company. on the nature of company law, there are some disputes, include forced law opinion, willfully law opinion and synthetic opinion considering present company law, i think the synthetic opinion is right the nature of constitution of company has two features : self - rule and ruled by law. in general, constitution of company is a kind of self - rule law that partly ruled by law
此外，本文還討論了確認決議不存在之訴與不當決議取消、變更之訴的存在價值，綜合考慮后，決定保留確認決議不存在之訴，廢除不當決議取消、變更之訴這一弊大於利的訴訟類別。除了總體探尋股東會決議瑕疵救濟制度的理論依據外，考慮到召集制度和決議方法在股東會決議制度上的重要性和二者具體內容的繁雜，本文還重點分析了召集制度上的瑕疵和決議方法上的瑕疵兩大訴由。另外，本文創設了「決議顯著不公正」這一新訴由以防止多數決的濫用，多數決的濫用多年來一直是股東會決議中的一大頑癥，但各國公司法卻一直對其缺乏明確的規制，筆者希冀以多數決的濫用造成決議顯著不公正這一現象作為訴由，並提出具有可操作性的標準，由法官裁量判斷是否構成多數決的濫用，以期彌補股東會表決制度上資本多數決原則的不足。
分享友人