防衛行為 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [fángwèihángwéi]
防衛行為 英文
act of defence
  • 防 : Ⅰ動詞（防鷥） provide against; defend against; guard against Ⅱ名詞1 （防守; 防禦） defence 2 （堤...
  • 衛 : Ⅰ動詞（保衛） defend; guard; protect Ⅱ名詞1 （周朝國名） wei a state in the zhou dynasty2 （姓氏...
  • 行 : 行Ⅰ名詞1 （行列） line; row 2 （排行） seniority among brothers and sisters:你行幾? 我行三。where...
  • 防衛 : defend
  • 行為 : action; behaviour; conduct; deed
  1. Furthermore, in given situation, if responsibility should be absolutely ascribed to the person who enkindles the criminal events, the victim who is involved to the events should be released from his afterwards defense

    此外，在特定情境下，犯罪事件的挑起者應承擔的責任也能夠排除被捲入者事後防衛行為的違法性。
  2. Justifiable defense is the act being exempted from crimes

    正當防衛不屬于犯罪行為。
  3. A rough, violent person who engages in destructive actions : mug, roughneck, rowdy, ruffian, tough. informal toughie. slang hood, punk. see attack / defend, crimes

    一個粗野、暴力的人，從事破壞性的行為：杯子、無賴、粗暴而又好爭吵的人、流氓、惡棍、鹵莽的人、小阿飛。參見「攻擊/防衛，罪行」 。
  4. According to the status quo accredited point of view, concerning the man ' s actus reus and mens rea, his conduct is neither justifiable homicide, nor unpremeditated manslaughter ( negligence or imprudence ), nor mayhem, nor tort, but indirect intentional homicide

    根據目前的通說，考慮到該男子的犯罪客觀方面和犯罪主觀方面，他的行為既不是特別防衛，也不是過失致人死亡（包括疏忽大意的過失和過于自信的過失） ，也不是故意傷害，更不是民事侵權行為，而是間接故意殺人。
  5. The arguments concentrate on two aspects primarily, one is whether the defense ’ s limit should be included in the concept of justifiable defense or not, the other is whether justifiable defense must do harm to the people who infringe the law or not. about the first question, someone oppose nominally and consider that the defense ’ s limit should not appear in the literal statement of the concept of justifiable defense, others oppose substantively and consider that the defense ’ s limit is not the element of justifiable defense and excessive defense should be bring into category of justifiable defense. in my opinion, the former standpoint apprehends the legal rules of justifiable defense solely and not associate with the legal rules of excessive defense

    本文認為:防衛限度條件應當納入正當防衛的概念，損害性不是正當防衛的必然要求;正當防衛是由人的自我防衛這一自然權利接受法律的洗禮以後形成的法定權利，自然權利屬性和階級性都是正當防衛的正當化根據;正當防衛中的不法侵害包括緊迫的犯罪或者違法行為，不法侵害中的「不法」是主客觀相統一的不法;正當防衛的主觀條件是基於對不法侵害的認識而決意實施防衛行為的心態，特定的防衛目的不是正當防衛的主觀條件。
  6. But, there are disputing and disagreements in the theory of criminal law and juridical practice about the questions of justifiable defense ’ s concept, origin, justification, precondition and subjective condition

    但是，不論在理論上還是實踐中，對于正當防衛的概念、成立條件、行為限度等問題都存在著一定的爭議和分歧。
  7. On the characteristics of unlawful infringement in justifiable defense

    正當防衛中不法侵害行為的特性
  8. Usa rugby ceo and president of operations nigel melville on saturday announced the appointment of potomac athletic club ' s peter baggetta as the union ' s new defence specialist coach

    在星期六的操作奈傑爾梅爾維爾的美國橄欖球行政主管和校長作為聯合的新防衛專家客車宣布了波托馬克河運動俱樂部的彼得?巴蓋塔的約會。
  9. And it justifies the afterwards defense in a certain extent

    這在一定程度上賦予事後防衛行為以正當性。
  10. Though the criminal law system has defects when it chooses to forgive the afterwards defense, but it shows its rationality in a good few fields

    選擇時特定情境下事後防衛行為不予懲罰的刑法體系雖然存在缺陷，卻可在更多方面凸顯其價值合理性。
  11. The attribution of one ' s own attitudes, feelings, or desires to someone or something as a naive or unconscious defense against anxiety or guilt

    不自主的防衛行為把某人自己的態度、感覺或慾望歸因到某人或某事上，以此作為與焦慮或內疚相對抗的幼稚或不自覺的反抗
  12. Criminal responsibility is not to be borne for a defensive act undertaken against ongoing physical assault, murder, robbery, rape, kidnap, and other violent crimes that seriously endanger personal safety that causes injury or death to the unlawful infringer since such an act is not an excessive defense

    對正在進行行凶、殺人、搶劫、強奸、綁架以及其他嚴重危及人身安全的暴力犯罪，採取防衛行為，造成不法侵害人傷亡的，不屬于防衛過當，不負刑事責任。
  13. If a person acts in defence against an on - going assault, murder, robbery, rape, kidnap or any other crime of violence that seriously endangers his personal safety, thus causing injury or death to the perpetrator of the unlawful act, it is not undue defence, and he shall not bear criminal responsibility

    對正在進行行凶、殺人、搶劫、強奸、綁架以及其他嚴重危及人身安全的暴力犯罪，採取防衛行為，造成不法侵害人傷亡的，不屬于防衛過當，不負刑事責任。
  14. The fifth part. the subjective condition of special justifiable defence. the acts of defence must be based on the cognition and purpose of defence. the discussion of this part is on the factors of the cognition and the will, the emphasis on the correct cognition of " violent perpetrator "

    第五部分，實施特殊正當防衛的主觀條件?一防衛行為須出於特定的防衛認識和防衛目的。論述了特殊正當防衛的認識因素和意志因素，其中特別強調對「暴力侵害人」必須有正確的認識。
  15. Moreover, in order to effectively protect lawful rights and interests and encourage citizens to carry out actively justifiable defence, our criminal law prescribes that if a person acts in defence against an on - going assault, murder, robbery, rape, kidnap and other crime of violence that seriously endangers his personal safety, thus causing injury or death to the perpetrator, it is justifiable defence instead of undue defence, and he shall not bear criminal responsibility

    此外，為了有效地保護合法權益，鼓勵公民積極進行正當防衛，我國刑法規定對于正在進行的行凶、殺人、搶劫、強奸、綁架以及其它嚴重危及人身安全的暴力犯罪，採取防衛行為造成不法侵害人傷亡的，屬于正當防衛而不是防衛過當，不負刑事責任。
  16. Chapter hi on the ground of the analysis of different opinions over the constitution of special defense, analyses and probes into the constitution of special defense in details which includes premise condition, time condition, object condition as well as subject condition, this part especially probes into the intension of the word of assault which brings about huge controversy

    其除了具有正當防衛權的共同特徵以外，還具有自己特有的屬性，即法益保護的單一性，防衛行為指向的特定性，防衛強度的無限性以及防衛前提的限制性。第三章，在剖析理論界對特殊防衛構成的不同觀點的基礎上，詳盡地分析和探討了特殊防衛的構成要件。
  17. Chapter n special defines the special defense as the defense acts. against an on - gong assault, murder, robbery, rape, kidnap and the other any crime of violence that seriously endangers his personal safety, causing injury or death to the perpetrator of the unlawful acts. this part also maintain that beside the characters of justified defense, there are still special characters of special defense

    第二章，界定了特殊防衛的概念，指出特殊防衛是指公民為了使本人或他人的人身安全免受正在進行的行凶、殺人、搶劫、強奸、綁架以及其他嚴重危及人身安全的暴力犯罪的侵害，針對侵害人人身所採取的即使是造成暴力犯罪人傷亡的防衛行為，也享受不承擔任何刑事責任的一種權利。
  18. Moreover, in order to effectively protect lawful rights and interests and encourage citize to carry out actively justifiable defence, our criminal law prescribes that if a person acts in defence agai t an on - going a ault, murder, ro ery, rape, kidnap and other crime of violence that seriously endangers his personal safety, thus causing injury or death to the perpetrator, it is justifiable defence i tead of undue defence, and he shall not bear criminal re o ibility

    此外，為了有效地保護合法權益，鼓勵公民積極進行正當防衛，我國刑法規定對于正在進行的行凶、殺人、搶劫、強奸、綁架以及其它嚴重危及人身安全的暴力犯罪，採取防衛行為造成不法侵害人傷亡的，屬于正當防衛而不是防衛過當，不負刑事責任。
  19. But for it to build armed forces that could overcome the combined might of the u. s., india and japan is not now, and probably never will be, a feasible project

    但若它加強防衛是為了擊敗美國，印度和日本之間可能的聯合，那麼這現在不會，也許永遠也不會成為，一個可行的計劃。
  20. The act of helping oneself, refers that during the continuing violations, in the state of being difficult to timely protection and restoration of rights under relying on the public relief, according to the right of helping oneself, the actor could act the action of detaining the perpetrator of the unlawful act, or seizing, detaining and destroying his property

    自救行為與正當防衛行為、緊急避險行為都是正對不正的行為，實質是一致的，但兩者的待遇卻大相徑庭。對于自救行為的合法性、構成要件等在理論界一直都眾說紛紜。本文運用總結、概括、對比、引證等研究方法對自救行為相關問題作了較詳盡的論述。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書