預審分庭 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [yùshěnfēntíng]
預審分庭 英文
pre-trial chamber
  • 預 : Ⅰ副詞（預先; 事先） in advance; beforehand Ⅱ動詞（參與） take part in
  • 審 : Ⅰ形容詞（詳細; 周密） careful Ⅱ動詞1 （審查） examine; go over 2 （審訊） interrogate; try 3 [書...
  • 分 : 分Ⅰ名詞1. （成分） component 2. （職責和權利的限度） what is within one's duty or rights Ⅱ同 「份」Ⅲ動詞[書面語] （料想） judge
  • 庭 : Ⅰ名詞1. （廳堂） hall 2. （正房前的院子） courtyard; front yard3. （指法庭） law court Ⅱ形容詞[書面語] （直） straight
  • 預審 : antecedent trial; preliminary hearing; inquiry預審程序 inquisitional procedure; 預審法官 investig...
  1. The current public prosecution mode in our country took shape from the past whole case - examine mode in the base of the thinking to get ride of the drawbacks in the past. in practice, it has not only become effective and cause out a lot of new defaults, for example, the definition of the main evidence is not clear, the transfer range of the case files is unclear and the stipulate of the examine consequence is not enough. in order to reform and perfect the current public prosecution mode, we should regard the theory of the public prosecution as guide, combine our country ' s conditions, on methodology jump out of the circle relatively drawing lessons from the past, on the procedural theory, change the idea that the forejudge caused from the substantive examination and clarify the objective fact the current public prosecution include the essential substantive examination, in practice regard legitimacy, rationality and flexibility as the principle of law enforcement before the law to revise, in legislation define the concept of the main evidence clearly, add the regulation to dispatch the examine judge and the trial judge, regulate the treatment methods after examination and revise some rules about the summary procedure

    以公訴審查制度的訴訟理念為指導，結合我國的國情，對現行公訴審查模式的改革和完善，在方法論上跳出以往比較借鑒的圈子；在訴訟理念上改變過去庭審法官預斷必然緣于實體性審查的觀念，以澄清現行公訴審查模式包括必要的實體審的客觀事實；在實踐中以合法性、合理性和靈活性作為立法修改前的執法原則；在立法上明確界定主要證據的范圍是對證明犯罪是否成立起主要作用或有重要影響的證據，其中既包括有罪證據也包括無罪證據，增加規定公訴審查法官與正式庭審法官分立制度，補充規定對公訴審查后開庭審理之外的其它情況的處理方法以及對於人民法院在審理過程中發現不宜適用簡易程序的，取消原刑訴法應當按照一般公訴案件適用的普通審判程序重新審理的規定，改為由審理該案件的獨任審判員以外的審判員重新組成合議庭對該案件進行重新審理等。
  2. The pre - trial review aims to, not to solve the question whether the defendant is guilty or not in advance, but to investigate according to the facts and the law whether the suitable reasons or the basis of accusing the defendant exist, so as to secure the reasonablitiy and justification of the criminal prosecution. although the pre - trial review procedure is not the independent procedure just like the investigation, prosecution and adjudication, but is the indispensable part of the complete trial procedure

    本文比較分析了外國刑事庭前審查程序的特點及程序價值，在此基礎上探討庭前審查的性質、功能和原則，認為預審程序是對公訴權濫用的有效制約機制，應堅持程序參與、程序公開、控辯平等、效率的基本原則，並充分發揮程序過濾、程序分流、證據開示、明確爭點、程序準備五大功能。
  3. This reform has significance of preventing the judge from preconceptions. but, because of the defects in the design of the systems, the system of discovery of evidence which is necessary to the new model of prosecution has n ' t been established at the same time. it led to the arising of new problems in practice, the most prominent one among them is the obstacle which obstructs the defense attorney to review files, and as a result, the reform in trial system has n ' t worked as expected

    我國修改後的刑事訴訟法採用了部分案件材料移送式起訴方式，這一改革對于避免法官先入為主，產生預斷具有積極意義，但由於制度設計上的缺陷，與新起訴方式相配套的證據開示制度未能與之同步建立，導致在實踐中出現了新的問題，其中最為突出的就是辯護律師閱卷權的行使受到阻礙，使得與之相關的庭審程序改革難以取得人們所期望的效果。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書