預審法官 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [yùshěnfǎguān]
預審法官
英文
inspecting magistrate- 預 : Ⅰ副詞(預先; 事先) in advance; beforehand Ⅱ動詞(參與) take part in
- 審 : Ⅰ形容詞(詳細; 周密) careful Ⅱ動詞1 (審查) examine; go over 2 (審訊) interrogate; try 3 [書...
- 法 : Ⅰ名詞1 (由國家制定或認可的行為規則的總稱) law 2 (方法; 方式) way; method; mode; means 3 (標...
- 預審 : antecedent trial; preliminary hearing; inquiry預審程序 inquisitional procedure; 預審法官 investig...
- 法官 : judge; justice
-
Committal for trial is the determination of examining justices.
押交審判是預審法官作出的決定。The current public prosecution mode in our country took shape from the past whole case - examine mode in the base of the thinking to get ride of the drawbacks in the past. in practice, it has not only become effective and cause out a lot of new defaults, for example, the definition of the main evidence is not clear, the transfer range of the case files is unclear and the stipulate of the examine consequence is not enough. in order to reform and perfect the current public prosecution mode, we should regard the theory of the public prosecution as guide, combine our country ' s conditions, on methodology jump out of the circle relatively drawing lessons from the past, on the procedural theory, change the idea that the forejudge caused from the substantive examination and clarify the objective fact the current public prosecution include the essential substantive examination, in practice regard legitimacy, rationality and flexibility as the principle of law enforcement before the law to revise, in legislation define the concept of the main evidence clearly, add the regulation to dispatch the examine judge and the trial judge, regulate the treatment methods after examination and revise some rules about the summary procedure
以公訴審查制度的訴訟理念為指導,結合我國的國情,對現行公訴審查模式的改革和完善,在方法論上跳出以往比較借鑒的圈子;在訴訟理念上改變過去庭審法官預斷必然緣于實體性審查的觀念,以澄清現行公訴審查模式包括必要的實體審的客觀事實;在實踐中以合法性、合理性和靈活性作為立法修改前的執法原則;在立法上明確界定主要證據的范圍是對證明犯罪是否成立起主要作用或有重要影響的證據,其中既包括有罪證據也包括無罪證據,增加規定公訴審查法官與正式庭審法官分立制度,補充規定對公訴審查后開庭審理之外的其它情況的處理方法以及對於人民法院在審理過程中發現不宜適用簡易程序的,取消原刑訴法應當按照一般公訴案件適用的普通審判程序重新審理的規定,改為由審理該案件的獨任審判員以外的審判員重新組成合議庭對該案件進行重新審理等。Set out from the peculiar procedure value, function and purpose of the public prosecution, the construction of the concrete mode of this system should be followed the principles of judicial examination on the subject, and substantive examination on the range and the rules avoiding the forejudge, basing on fact and taking law as criterion, in order to accord with the legal spirit and procedural theory of the public prosecution
從公訴審查特有的訴訟價值、功能和目的出發,公訴審查制度具體模式的構建應當遵循審查主體上的司法審查原則、審查范圍上的以定罪為中心的實體審原則、排除庭審法官預斷的原則以及以事實為根據以法律為準繩的原則和及時審理原則等,以符合公訴審查制度所內涵的法律精神和訴訟理念。The judge may institute proceedings.
預審法官可以受理案件。In addition, the legislative council of the hksar is also given the power to endorse the appointment and removal of the judges of the court of final appeal and the chief judge of the high court, as well as the power to impeach the chief executive
立法會的職權包括制定法律審核及通過財政預算稅收和公共開支以及監察政府的工作。此外,立法會更獲得基本法賦予權力同意終審法院法官和高等法院首席法官的任免,並有權彈劾行政長官。Finally, it detailedly explains the duty of examining justice, the starting and enfering way of inquisitional procedure, and the main content of the inquisition
對預審法官的職責、預審程序的啟動、實施方式、審查的主要內容等問題作了詳盡詮釋。Part iv guarantee of examining - justice system this part maps out a design in china ' s examining - jus t ice system
四、預審法官制度的制度保障本部分就我國建立預審法官制度所需要的程序保障措施作了一個設計。The argument of whether the investigating magistrate should be retained ordismissed
法國預審法官存廢之爭Then, the author puts forward suggestions about amending regulations of chinese preliminary examination, such as setting up the system of chinese investigating magistrate
在此基礎上,提出了「建立我國預審法官制度」等完善我國刑事庭前審查程序的構想。It also expounds the value of pritrial system and the basic pattern of examining - justic system
建立預審法官制度,接著論述了預審制度的價值取向和預審法官制度的基本模式。In united states v. carroll towing co., he defined reasonable care in algebraic terms. under the learned hand rule, a party is found negligent and therefore liable for ( at least part of ) the damages resulting from his actions if b < pl. " b ", the burden of adequate precautions, is the accident avoidance cost
漢德法官在對「美利堅合眾國訴卡羅爾拖輪公司案」的審理中,根據此理論提出了廣為人知的「漢德公式」 : b pl ,即侵害方是否承擔責任取決於他採取預防措施的費用)是大於還是小於事故發生的可能性叩)和事故造成的損失幾)的乘積。Hardly had the door closed when villefort threw himself half - fainting into a chair. " alas, alas, " murmured he, " if the procureur himself had been at marseilles i should have been ruined. this accursed letter would have destroyed all my hopes
過了一會他喃喃地說: 「啊,我的上帝,假如檢察官此時在馬賽,假如剛才不是叫我,而是找到了預審法官,那可就全完了,這封告發信,差點把我打入十八層地獄。To establish such a system, the following problems must be solved : a ) prosecuting attorney should be the party concerned ; b ) the evidence - showing system should be established ; c ) inegal evidences should be excluded ; d ) the attorney ' s right should be ensured
指出,要在我國建立預審法官制度,必須解決以下問題: ( 1 )實現檢察官的當事人化; ( 2 )確立證據展示制度( 3 )實行非法證據排除規則( 4 )保障律師權利。The following aspects, such as setting prejudication judger system, rationally collocating the rights and incumbency of pretrial both sides, establishing force answer system for appellee and mounting pretrial meeting system, should be the basic breakthrough point for perfecting the pretrial procedure system of our country
應從設置預審法官制度、合理配置審前各方的權利義務、建立強制被告答辯制度、設置審前會議制度等方面作為基本切入點完善我國的審前程序機制。2. 3 the procedure of evidence discovery and sanction against the infringement 2. 3. 1 a brief introduction to the evidence discovery in the us and japan, for instance, as an important part of pre - court procedure in the us, prosecutors must disclose the relevant evidence to defendant even though the defendant gives up the pre - court or the pre - court procedure is absent in certain circumstances
(三)證據展示的程序以及違法制裁介紹美、日證據展示程序情況,如在美國屬預審程序的一項重要內容,即使被告放棄預審或不需預審的情況出現,檢察官也必須對需在審理中使用的證據對被告告之。Apart from its law - making function, the legislative council debates issues of public interest, examines and approves budgets, receives and debates the chief executive s policy addresses, and endorses the appointment and removal of the judges of the court of final appeal and the chief judge of the high court
除了立法職能外,立法會還負責就有關公眾利益的事宜進行辯論、審核和通過財政預算案、聽取行政長官的施政報告並進行辯論,以及同意終審法院法官和高等法院首席法官的任免。And the fundamental way out for the realization of the judicial impartiality lies in its reformation. on the basis of the principle of rule of law in constitution and by using the advanced experience of china and foreign countries for reference, we ought to reform the outdated judicial system which does n ' t conform to the operating law of administration of justice inside, to better the leadership system of judiciary by the party, to improve the relationship of power between legislative bodies ( the npc at all levels ) and judicial organs, to restrict the unjustified interventions of judicial powers by administrative authority, and to repres s the local, implemental and administrative trends in judicial powers. and within the operating mechanism of judicial powers, we should perfect the selection of judges and their job security and enhance the requisite qualifications to be judges
司法改革的根本目標是司法公正,實現司法公正的根本出路在於司法改革,我們應當根據憲法的法治原則,借鑒中外司法制度中的先進成果,改革不符合司法權內在運作規律要求的舊的司法制度,改革黨對司法的領導體制,完善立法機關(各級人大)與司法的權力關系,控制行政權對司法權的不當干預,阻止司法權的地方化、工具化及行政化的趨勢;在司法權運作機制內部,完善法官的選拔及職業保障,抬高法官的資格門檻,同時廢除違反司法權性質的上下級之間請示、匯報、審批制度等等。Judges should make efforts to realize justice in law, taking procedural justice and substantial justice as same important, endeavoring to realize the doctrine of factuality, trying hard to realize the substantial justice through procedural justice. judges should have profound knowledge in the theory of laws, adept knowledge in law, common way of thinking of homogeneity, abundant social experience and deep humanistic consideration, and noble morality. judges should adjudicate case in neutral capacity, not being influenced by unfair influence, interference and controlling, and should intervene disputes there still exist lots of problems in the present situation of professional judges in accordance with the requirements of professionlization of judges
職業化的法官,應有崇高的法律信仰,法律是法官的最高權威和唯一上司,法官只忠實於法律,服務於法律;應有共同的價值追求,把保護個體權利作為裁判遵循的首要價值,努力通過法律實現正義,把程序正義和實體正義作為同等重要的價值對待,並努力使法律真實接近客觀真實,力求通過程序正義實現實體正義;應具有豐富的法學理論知識,嫻熟的法律專業知識,同質化的共同思維形式,豐富的閱歷,深切的人文關懷和崇高的職業道德修養;法官應以中立裁判者的身份,具有真正的審理權和裁決權,而不受任何不正當的影響、干預或控制,不主動介入糾紛和爭議。That is, when courts practise their authorities, they subject to only to law. no other units organizations or individuals shall interfere, including the legislative organs and the ruling party. inside courts, independence means that when a judge pactise his authority, he is independent of the interference from the court heads, his other superiorsand other judges, and that courts of lower level are independent from courts of higher levels
司法獨立是現代法治國家的重要原則,包括審判權獨立、司法的外部獨立、司法的內部獨立,即法院行使審判權只服從法律,不受任何機關、組織和個人的干涉,包括立法機關、執政黨都不能干涉,在法院內部首先是法官獨立,即法官行使審判權獨立於院長、庭長及其他法官,其次是上、下級法院之間的相互獨立,下級法院獨立行使審判權,不應受到來自上級法院的不正當干預。Thus there are two areas of concern : firstly, although criminal prosecutions or administrative means have already been carried out, the infringement has occurred and the interests of the obligee has been violated. without setting definite areas of indemnification due to the infringement, the interests of the obligee cannot be assured and on the other hand, it can not prevent further torts. secondly, in evaluating the indemnification of the torts, there is no standard or scope which can cause difficulty in judicial judgment, especially in the evaluation of the intangible injury or the injury which cannot be enumerated, and in the evaluation of the evidence that causes injury
在過去多年的司法實踐表明,單憑刑事和行政手段,未必能完全保護知識產權權利人之利益,這里有兩個方面思考:第一,即使作出了刑事和行政手段,有關的侵害行為可能已經作出,並導致權利人利益受損,在沒有規范侵權人需要為侵權行為所承擔的賠償范圍,一方面未能保障權利人之利益,另一方面也未能產生阻嚇作用,提升預防功能;第二,對侵權行為進行損害賠償計算時,並沒有統一標準和范圍,對于司法審判造成一定難度,尤其是對于非財產損害之計算、造成損失之舉證和無法列明之損失各個方面,也使法官在確定損害賠償金額時,需要考慮和注意的問題。分享友人