預審程序 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [yùshěnchéngxù]
預審程序 英文
inquisition procedure
  • 預 : Ⅰ副詞（預先; 事先） in advance; beforehand Ⅱ動詞（參與） take part in
  • 審 : Ⅰ形容詞（詳細; 周密） careful Ⅱ動詞1 （審查） examine; go over 2 （審訊） interrogate; try 3 [書...
  • 程 : 名詞1 （規章; 法式） rule; regulation 2 （進度; 程序） order; procedure 3 （路途; 一段路） journe...
  • 預審 : antecedent trial; preliminary hearing; inquiry預審程序 inquisitional procedure; 預審法官 investig...
  • 程序 : 1 （進行次序） order; procedure; course; sequence; schedule; ground rule; routing process 2 [自動...
  1. In the fourth part, the study constructed the institution system of environmental administrative guidance coping with green barrier preliminarily, which included proposal board institution, governmental early warning mechanism, coordination - board on foreign trade. environmental stan dard guidance, finance and banking supporting policy in main. besides, the study explored the subject, procedure, legal responsibility and relief institution of environmental administrative guidance in this part

    第四部分初步探索構建了以審議會制度、政府預警機制、外貿協調會、環境標準引導、財政金融支持政策為主要內容的應對綠色壁壘的環境行政指導制度體系，並就環境行政指導的主體、程序、法律責任與法律救濟進行了探討。
  2. The current public prosecution mode in our country took shape from the past whole case - examine mode in the base of the thinking to get ride of the drawbacks in the past. in practice, it has not only become effective and cause out a lot of new defaults, for example, the definition of the main evidence is not clear, the transfer range of the case files is unclear and the stipulate of the examine consequence is not enough. in order to reform and perfect the current public prosecution mode, we should regard the theory of the public prosecution as guide, combine our country ' s conditions, on methodology jump out of the circle relatively drawing lessons from the past, on the procedural theory, change the idea that the forejudge caused from the substantive examination and clarify the objective fact the current public prosecution include the essential substantive examination, in practice regard legitimacy, rationality and flexibility as the principle of law enforcement before the law to revise, in legislation define the concept of the main evidence clearly, add the regulation to dispatch the examine judge and the trial judge, regulate the treatment methods after examination and revise some rules about the summary procedure

    以公訴審查制度的訴訟理念為指導，結合我國的國情，對現行公訴審查模式的改革和完善，在方法論上跳出以往比較借鑒的圈子；在訴訟理念上改變過去庭審法官預斷必然緣于實體性審查的觀念，以澄清現行公訴審查模式包括必要的實體審的客觀事實；在實踐中以合法性、合理性和靈活性作為立法修改前的執法原則；在立法上明確界定主要證據的范圍是對證明犯罪是否成立起主要作用或有重要影響的證據，其中既包括有罪證據也包括無罪證據，增加規定公訴審查法官與正式庭審法官分立制度，補充規定對公訴審查后開庭審理之外的其它情況的處理方法以及對於人民法院在審理過程中發現不宜適用簡易程序的，取消原刑訴法應當按照一般公訴案件適用的普通審判程序重新審理的規定，改為由審理該案件的獨任審判員以外的審判員重新組成合議庭對該案件進行重新審理等。
  3. The pre - court examination is usually conducted in the form of prejudication or arraignment in countries that following anglo - american law system, that is limited to procedural examination

    英美法系國家庭前審查一般是通過預審或提審進行，主要限於程序性審查。
  4. We should reform and perfect the pre - court examination procedure of public prosecution case in our country by re - selecting trial model, setting up pre - court examination procedure and delegating the prejudication duty to court that file the case

    應通過重新選擇審查模式，設立預審程序並由立案庭承擔預審職責等途徑對我國公訴案件庭前審查程序進行改革和完善。
  5. The implementation of this system for more man ten years clearly shows that the multi - channel institution of retrial does not produce the desired effects. the present retrial system modelled itself mainly on that of the former soviet union, its operation in china gives rise to more state intervention than individual disposal, more layman recognised truth than truth recognised by law, seeking justice in substantial law more than legal procedure, and finally brings about " numerous applicants, unlimited lapse of time, high frequency, confused jurisdiction, unmethodical causes of action "

    現行民訴法實施十多年的司法實踐表明發動再審程序主體的多元性並沒有產生預期的效果，由於現行的民事再審主要是參照前蘇聯模式，在再審程序的啟動上，強調國家干預權，忽視當事人處分權；在事實認定上，追求客觀真實，忽視法律真實；在糾錯上，注重實體公正，忽視程序公正；從而導致在實際操作中出現了啟動再審的「主體無限、時間無限、次數無限、審級無限、理由或條件無限」的不良現象。
  6. Finally, it detailedly explains the duty of examining justice, the starting and enfering way of inquisitional procedure, and the main content of the inquisition

    對預審法官的職責、預審程序的啟動、實施方式、審查的主要內容等問題作了詳盡詮釋。
  7. Part iv guarantee of examining - justice system this part maps out a design in china ' s examining - jus t ice system

    四、預審法官制度的制度保障本部分就我國建立預審法官制度所需要的程序保障措施作了一個設計。
  8. Comparative study on examining procedure of public prosecution in china mainland and inquisitional procedure in macao

    中國大陸公訴案件審查程序與澳門預審程序之比較研究
  9. Then, the author puts forward suggestions about amending regulations of chinese preliminary examination, such as setting up the system of chinese investigating magistrate

    在此基礎上，提出了「建立我國預審法官制度」等完善我國刑事庭前審查程序的構想。
  10. Because counter party is always put at a disadvantage, they should get the opportunity to review during the making process of e - contract. they also should be offered the manifesting assent right. these are the key point to confirm the effectiveness of e - format contract

    由於相對人處於弱勢地位，在合同的訂立中應注意使相對人具有適當預先審查的機會，以及必經的明示同意程序權，這是確定電子格式合同效力的關鍵。
  11. The main scope of bcpa s business entrusted by the chinese - foreign joint ventures, the chinese - foreign contractual joint ventures, the foreign capital enterprises and other foreign economic organizations, big and medium sized state enterprises, share - holding companies with limited liability and companies with limited liability, to prepare feasibility s study and analysis for investment and development projects of enterprises ; to undertake assets valuation ; to verify the capital of enterprises ; to formulate accounting systems ; to design computerized program for accounting ; to keep accounts for clients ; to offer consultation service and prepare tax returns for clients ; to audit accounting statements for enterprises ; to audit statements of securities business ; to undertake the auditing work of enterprises in their merger, separation and liquidation ; to do the required auditing when the legal representative of an enterprise leaves his her post ; to serve as the standing accounting advisers for enterprises ; to help draft contracts, articles of association and economic documents ; to prepare analysis of economic activities and forecast of operating activities ; to train accounting financial management personnel and to examine evidences in economic cases, etc. by offering high efficiency, fine quality and comprehensive service and outstanding performance bcpa has gained the confidence o its clients and established good and stable and 3, 000 clients

    本所業務范圍主要是：接受中外合資中外合作外商獨資和其他外商經濟組織，以及國有大中型企業股份有限公司有限責任公司等的委託，為企業投資開發項目進行可行性研究分析承辦資產評估驗證企業資本設計會計制度編制會計電算程序代理記帳提供咨詢服務稅務代理服務受理企業會計報表審計證券業務審計企業合併分立清算事宜中的審計企業法人離任審計為企業承擔常年會計顧問協助擬定合同章程和經濟文件經濟活動分析和經營活動預測培訓會計財務管理人員以及鑒證經濟案件等項業務。本所以高效優質全面的服務，卓著的業績取得了廣大客戶的信任，與3000餘家客戶建立了良好的穩定的合作關系。
  12. The following aspects, such as setting prejudication judger system, rationally collocating the rights and incumbency of pretrial both sides, establishing force answer system for appellee and mounting pretrial meeting system, should be the basic breakthrough point for perfecting the pretrial procedure system of our country

    應從設置預審法官制度、合理配置審前各方的權利義務、建立強制被告答辯制度、設置審前會議制度等方面作為基本切入點完善我國的審前程序機制。
  13. The comparative analysis of the features of procedures in pre - trial of criminal cases

    刑事預審程序特徵的比較法分析
  14. The way is to learn from britain and america, and to establish an examihing - justice system

    就應借鑒英、美的預審程序。
  15. Establishing the pre - trial review procedure after the procuratorial agency ' s prosecution and before the official court trial, is the particular requirements and performance of fairness and efficiency while designing and performancing the criminal system as well as the reasonable restriction to the national power of prosecution and the proper safeguard to the dependant ` s rights in the modern society

    我國1996年刑事訴訟法對原庭前審查制度作了較大修改，其弱化庭前審查程序並不符合各國立法的一般發展趨勢。針對現行刑事訴訟庭前審查程序中存在的諸多缺陷，文章最後提出了建構我國刑事預審程序的若干設想。
  16. The pre - trial review aims to, not to solve the question whether the defendant is guilty or not in advance, but to investigate according to the facts and the law whether the suitable reasons or the basis of accusing the defendant exist, so as to secure the reasonablitiy and justification of the criminal prosecution. although the pre - trial review procedure is not the independent procedure just like the investigation, prosecution and adjudication, but is the indispensable part of the complete trial procedure

    本文比較分析了外國刑事庭前審查程序的特點及程序價值，在此基礎上探討庭前審查的性質、功能和原則，認為預審程序是對公訴權濫用的有效制約機制，應堅持程序參與、程序公開、控辯平等、效率的基本原則，並充分發揮程序過濾、程序分流、證據開示、明確爭點、程序準備五大功能。
  17. 2. 3 the procedure of evidence discovery and sanction against the infringement 2. 3. 1 a brief introduction to the evidence discovery in the us and japan, for instance, as an important part of pre - court procedure in the us, prosecutors must disclose the relevant evidence to defendant even though the defendant gives up the pre - court or the pre - court procedure is absent in certain circumstances

    （三）證據展示的程序以及違法制裁介紹美、日證據展示程序情況，如在美國屬預審程序的一項重要內容，即使被告放棄預審或不需預審的情況出現，檢察官也必須對需在審理中使用的證據對被告告之。
  18. There ' re hot debates among the theorial and practical fields, the function of guarding against and correcting errors ca n ' t applied sufficiently, the anticipatory determination of establishing this system is difficult to achieve

    理論界和實務界對民事再審制度爭議頗多，司法實踐中民事再審程序的防錯糾錯功能也未能得到充分地發揮，立法設置民事再審程序的預期目的也很難達到。
  19. The full assessment process is expected to take 10 to 14 weeks

    整個評審程序預期需時十至十四個星期。
  20. This reform has significance of preventing the judge from preconceptions. but, because of the defects in the design of the systems, the system of discovery of evidence which is necessary to the new model of prosecution has n ' t been established at the same time. it led to the arising of new problems in practice, the most prominent one among them is the obstacle which obstructs the defense attorney to review files, and as a result, the reform in trial system has n ' t worked as expected

    我國修改後的刑事訴訟法採用了部分案件材料移送式起訴方式，這一改革對于避免法官先入為主，產生預斷具有積極意義，但由於制度設計上的缺陷，與新起訴方式相配套的證據開示制度未能與之同步建立，導致在實踐中出現了新的問題，其中最為突出的就是辯護律師閱卷權的行使受到阻礙，使得與之相關的庭審程序改革難以取得人們所期望的效果。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書