飛機翼梁 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [fēiliáng]
飛機翼梁 英文
aircraft wing spar
  • : Ⅰ動詞1 (鳥、蟲等在空中活動) fly; flit 2 (利用動力機械在空中行動) fly 3 (在空中飄浮遊動) fly...
  • : machineengine
  • : Ⅰ名詞1 (翅膀) the wing of a bird 2 (像翅膀的東西) the wing of an aeroplane etc : 鼻翼 wing of...
  • : 名詞1 (屋架中架在柱子上的長木) beam 2 (通常也指檁) purlin 3 (橋) bridge4 (物體中間條狀隆起...
  • 機翼 : [航空] wing; wing unit; aerofoil; airfoil
  1. Study of the accelerated corrosion tests of aluminum alloy flanges for aircraft structures

    結構鋁合金緣條的加速腐蝕研究
  2. The ntsb says the wing of that seaplane that crashed off miami had cracks in the main support beam that probably went unseen for a long time

    安全運輸委員會說,在邁阿密墜毀的水上在主要支撐處有斷裂,這種情況已經很久都沒有發生過了
  3. Abstract : a new method, collaborative allocation ( ca ), is proposed to solve the large - scale optimum allocation problem in aircraft conceptual design. according to the characteristics of optimum allocation in aircraft conceptual design. the principle and mathematical model of ca are established. the optimum allocation problem is decomposed into one main optimization problem and several sub - optimization problems. a group of design requirements for subsystems are provided by the main system respectively, and the subsystems execute their own optimizations or further provide the detailed design requirements to the bottom components of aircraft, such as spars, ribs and skins, etc. the subsystems minimize the discrepancy between their own local variables and the corresponding allocated values, and then return the optimization results to main optimization. the main optimization is performed to reallocate the design requirements for improving the integration performance and progressing toward the compatibilities among subsystems. ca provides the general optimum allocation architecture and is easy to be carried out. furthermore, the concurrent computation can also be realized. two examples of optimum reliability allocation are used to describe the implementation procedure of ca for two - level allocation and three - level allocation respectively, and to validate preliminarily its correctness and effectiveness. it is shown that the developed method can be successfully used in optimum allocation of design requirements. then taking weight requirement allocation as example, the mathematical model and solution procedure for collaborative allocation of design requirements in aircraft conceptual design are briefly depicted

    文摘:探討了一種新的設計指標最優分配方法- -協同分配法,用於處理頂層設計中的大規模設計指標最優分配問題.分析了頂層設計中的設計指標最優分配特徵,據此給出了協同法的原理並建立了數學模型.協同法按設計指標分配關系將最優分配問題分解為主系統優化和子系統優化,主優化對子系統設計指標進行最優分配,子優化以最小化分配設計指標值與期望設計指標值之間的差異為目標,進行子系統最優設計,或對底層元件(如飛機翼梁肋和盒等)進行設計指標最優分配,並把最優解信息反饋給主優化.主優化通過子優化最優解信息構成的一致性約束協調分配量,提高系統整體性能,並重新給出分配方案.主系統與子系統反復協調,直到得到設計指標最優分配方案.兩層可靠度指標分配算例初步驗證了本文方法的正確性與可行性,三層可靠度指標分配算例證明了本文方法的有效性.最後,以重量指標分配為例,簡要敘述了針對頂層設計中設計指標協同分配的數學模型和求解思路
  4. A new method, collaborative allocation ( ca ), is proposed to solve the large - scale optimum allocation problem in aircraft conceptual design. according to the characteristics of optimum allocation in aircraft conceptual design. the principle and mathematical model of ca are established. the optimum allocation problem is decomposed into one main optimization problem and several sub - optimization problems. a group of design requirements for subsystems are provided by the main system respectively, and the subsystems execute their own optimizations or further provide the detailed design requirements to the bottom components of aircraft, such as spars, ribs and skins, etc. the subsystems minimize the discrepancy between their own local variables and the corresponding allocated values, and then return the optimization results to main optimization. the main optimization is performed to reallocate the design requirements for improving the integration performance and progressing toward the compatibilities among subsystems. ca provides the general optimum allocation architecture and is easy to be carried out. furthermore, the concurrent computation can also be realized. two examples of optimum reliability allocation are used to describe the implementation procedure of ca for two - level allocation and three - level allocation respectively, and to validate preliminarily its correctness and effectiveness. it is shown that the developed method can be successfully used in optimum allocation of design requirements. then taking weight requirement allocation as example, the mathematical model and solution procedure for collaborative allocation of design requirements in aircraft conceptual design are briefly depicted

    探討了一種新的設計指標最優分配方法- -協同分配法,用於處理頂層設計中的大規模設計指標最優分配問題.分析了頂層設計中的設計指標最優分配特徵,據此給出了協同法的原理並建立了數學模型.協同法按設計指標分配關系將最優分配問題分解為主系統優化和子系統優化,主優化對子系統設計指標進行最優分配,子優化以最小化分配設計指標值與期望設計指標值之間的差異為目標,進行子系統最優設計,或對底層元件(如飛機翼梁肋和盒等)進行設計指標最優分配,並把最優解信息反饋給主優化.主優化通過子優化最優解信息構成的一致性約束協調分配量,提高系統整體性能,並重新給出分配方案.主系統與子系統反復協調,直到得到設計指標最優分配方案.兩層可靠度指標分配算例初步驗證了本文方法的正確性與可行性,三層可靠度指標分配算例證明了本文方法的有效性.最後,以重量指標分配為例,簡要敘述了針對頂層設計中設計指標協同分配的數學模型和求解思路
  5. Then, the modal analysis of two differently typical biomimetic wings are conducted and their modal parameters as nature frequency and vibration modes are obtained. as a result, the plane - structure wings with shell elements for fmav is not ideal comparing with the truss - structure wings composed by shell and pipe elements

    利用ansys軟體對兩種結構類型的仿生進行模態分析,得到其低階固有頻率及振型等模態參數,並由結果指出純殼單元平板結構作為微撲行器的不夠理想,而採用單元和殼單元的復合結構是設計微撲行器的一個方向。
分享友人