action of tort 中文意思是什麼
action of tort
解釋
侵權行為訴訟-
The cause is that depending strength of government only to hit lawless proprietor and safeguard consumer ' s leigitimate rights and interests is limited, because the proprietor can constringe the action of self due to the government strike it strongly in the short - term, but government can not be persisted over a long period of time because of the restriction of resources such as funds etc. in another aspect, if encouraging consumer to safeguard the leigitimate rights and interests of self, the probability that proprietor ' s tort occurs could reduce generally, moreover it is lasting
本文首先從靜態的角度來分析消費者權益受到損害的原因。通過分析發現，單純地依靠政府的力量來打擊不法經營者、維護消費者合法權益的作用是有限的，短期中經營者會因為政府加大打擊力度而收斂自己的行為，但政府由於受經費等資源的限制，不可能長期堅持下去。從另一個角度，如果鼓勵消費者維護自身的合法權益，則經營者侵權行為發生的概率會降低，而且具有持久性。 -
The duty of tort ; c. the compensation for the result of tort. the theories of ecomomic analysis of tort law indicate that tort is a kind of action that tort - feasor breaches his duty and that the parties cannot reach an agreement in advance to solve the problem of compensation
經濟分析法學的侵權行為經濟理論表明，侵權是一種給他人造成損害的失職行為，且對這一種行為的後果，相對人無法通過求助事先的合同來解決賠償問題，也就是說，事前談判的成本將是非常昂貴的。 -
Writer ' s view of point is that delivery of cargo without original bills of lading has the character of breaching of the contract, because releasing cargo against original bills of lading is carrier ' s legal liability in carrying out the carriage of goods by sea. also it has the character of action in tort, as if the actions violate the civil law of liability in tort, the doer shall take on the liability of compensation. however when actions are both of breach and in tort, the chinese law gives the victim the rights to choose to sue in tort or of breach, but some limitations in applying substantive law
第二章論述無單放貨的法律性質，筆者認為，無單放貨具有違約性，因為保證憑正本提單交付貨物是承運人在履行海上貨物運輸合同中的一項法定義務；無單放貨具有侵權性，只要無單放貨行為構成承擔侵權行為民事責任的要件，無單放貨行為人就必須承擔賠償責任；同時，無單放貨的違約性和侵權性可能構成責任競合時，我國法律允許受害人可以選擇一個訴因行使其請求權，但對實體法請求權的選擇，法律作出了一定范圍的限制；最後，無單放貨在某種程度上促進了航運業的發展，我們不能一概加以否定，無單放貨在特定情況下具有一定的合理性。 -
Directors of dltp includes de jure directors, de facto directors and shadow directors and third parties is composed of shareholders, creditors and some special creditors, such as governmental tr. x agencies, social security departments and corporate employees. the legal nature of dltp is special liability and different from liabilities mder tort, accordingly directors have to face both the liabilities under civil law and the special liabilities under corporate law. a director is not liable to third parties except that his or her action is illegal ; he or she is guilty of wrongful intent or of gross negligence for the illegal action ; the action occurs in the course of performing his or her corporate suties ; and third parties are damaged by the action
作者指出，董事對第三人責任中的董事不僅指正式董事，而且還包括影子董事和事實董事;除了股東和一般債權人之外，第三人還包括二些特殊債權人，如稅務機關、社保機關以及雇員等;其責任性質為法定責任，但並不排除與民法侵權責任競合的可能;董事對第三人責任應包括以下要件: .董事之行為須違法、董事對其行為違法有故意或重大過失、董事之行為發生於執行職務過程中、第三人因董事之違法行為受損害;在舉證責任的分擔上應有董事證明其違法行為是否有故意或重大過失，實現這一制度的訴訟形式為第三人之訴;另外，在公司破產時應採取一些特殊措施，以保證公平受償。 -
The problem whether the action and compensation should be made concerns the applied conditions in wh ich the compensation system of the civil liability in the security transaction. so, the definition for the category of civil liability of transaction in securities include four parts : the definition of principal part in the security trans act ion ; the definition of causal relationship which happens between act of tort and the fact of damnification ; ! he definition of the style civil liability in the security transaction and the definition of error
應不應該訴、應不應該賠指的是何種四川大學碩士學位論文情況下適用證券交易民事責任賠償制度。因此，證券交易民事責任的界定包括證券交易民事責任主體的界定、證券交易民事責任類型的界定、因果關系的界定、過錯的界定證券交易民事責任.與一般侵權行為相比，證交易民事責任不同與一般民事責任。 -
On the basis of analyse of the possibility of securities tort action, author point out that in order to protect more investors interests, the current grounds of review should be enlarged. then author propose that there are several major case types should be included into the legislation. finally the essay take advantages from u. s. a. theory of " implied private right of action ", and advise that we should expand the grounds of review according to u. s. a legislation
首先考察了我國證券民事侵權賠償訴訟的現行受案范圍；其次通過對證券民事侵權糾紛的可訴性及其依據的分析，指出我國現行的受案范圍應加以擴大，以保護更多投資者利益；然後接下來具體闡述了現階段我國證券民事侵權賠償訴訟應受理的主要案件類型；最後，提出借鑒美國「默示民事訴權理論」 ，適度擴大受案范圍，以應對資本市場上的新情況、新問題。 -
I think, news is a report action concerning late occurring incidents by means of public spread mediums such as newspapers, magazines, news agencies, broadcasts and televisions. news tort is an action which news units
最後對新聞侵權抗辯事由的概念、功能、內容以及新聞侵權責任的財產責任方式和非財產責任方式作出了詳盡的論述。 -
Present regulations of civil tort action on securities limit the investors to exercise the right to bring a suit against concerned bodies, so they are must be bettered and completed
現行的有關涉及證券侵權的民事訴訟的規定限制了投資者行使訴訟權利，有必要做出修正。 -
For convenience of study, author define the concept of the civil litigation for securities tort compensation at first, then analyse its characteristics compared with general civil action for tort, and explore its functions. part two. introduction of the history and current situation of the civil litigation for securities tort compensation in china
由於涉及證券的民事糾紛種類很多，因之提起的民事訴訟也有不同種類，為了研究方便，首先對證券民事侵權賠償訴訟的概念作了界定；其次，分析了證券民事侵權賠償訴訟與一般民事訴訟相比具有的突出特點，並從宏觀和微觀的角度對證券民事侵權賠償訴訟具有的功能進行了討論，為後面的研究作了鋪墊。 -
Tom ( including his representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns ) hereby completely releases and forever discharges the company, its affiliated, related and subsidiary entities, and each of their present and former shareholders, officers, directors, agents, employees, attorneys, successors, and assigns ( collectively, “ released parties ” ) from all claims, rights, demands, actions, obligations, liabilities, and causes of action of every kind and character, known or unknown, mature or unmatured, which he may now have or have ever had arising from any act or omission or condition occurring on or prior to his signing this agreement, whether based on tort, contract ( express or implied ), or any federal, state, or local law, statute, or regulation and any claims for attorneys ' fees
湯姆（包括其代表人、繼承人、后繼者和受讓人在內）特此放棄和永久解除因為在其簽署本協議之時或之前發生的任何行動、疏漏或情況而導致其目前或過往對本公司及本公司關聯、相關及附屬實體以及該等公司之現有及先前的股東、高級職員、董事、代理商、雇員、律師、繼任者及委託人（統稱「被解除方」 ）所主張的一切索賠、權利、要求、行動、義務、債務以及導致任一種類與性質之行動的各種已知或未知、成熟或不成熟的理由，無論該等主張基於侵權行為，合約（明示或暗示） ，或任何聯邦、州或當地的法律、法令或規章，以及關于律師費的索賠。 -
In no event shall either party be liable to the other for any special or other indirect damages of any kind, including but not limited to, loss of profits or damages, however caused and on any theory of liability, whether in any action for contract, strict liability or tort ( including negligence ) or any other legal or equitable grounds
在任何事件中，對于任何特殊和間接的損害雙方都要承擔責任，包括不受限制的利益損失或損害，無論什麼原因和責任推斷，是否屬于合同規定內的行為，都要以法律和公平為依據，明確責任和民事侵權行為（包括因疏忽造成的後果） 。 -
Second, discusses the imputation of the liability of trademark right, and points out : it is practicable to establish the system of " right of the real claim " or " right of intellectual property claim ", with succeeding and perfecting the system of liability for tort at the same time ; the compensation for damage of infringement of trademark right should take the principle liability for fault as the main liability principle and the principle liability for fault inferred as a complement. third, discusses the excuses which may be as a plea in the action of the infringement of trademark right, such as fair use, prior right, forfeiter of trademark right. at last, approach the subject that how to apply and perfect legal proceedings and alter ways to the remedies of trademark right
接著，探討了侵犯商標權責任的認定，指出：可在繼承與完善我國侵權民事責任制度的同時設立物上請求權或知識產權上請求權制度來保護商標權；侵犯商標權的損害賠償宜採用過錯責任為主、過錯推定責任為輔的歸責原則；隨后，探討了侵犯商標權訴訟中可以作為抗辯的事由，如合理使用、在先權、商標權無效等；最後，探討了運用和完善訴訟和訴訟外兩種方式救濟商標權的問題。 -
In the event that a court should hold that the limitations on ups s liability set forth in this agreement are unenforceable for any reason, or that any of your remedies fail of their essential purpose, you agree that in no event shall ups s total liability for any damages direct or otherwise or loss regardless of the form of action or claim, whether in contract, tort or otherwise, exceed usd 10. 00
如果法院裁定本協議所規定的ups責任限制基於任何理由而無法執行，或閣下的任何補償未能達到其基本目的，則閣下同意，在任何情況下， ups對任何損害直接或其他形式或損失的全部責任，無論訴訟或索賠形式如何，不管是否基於合同侵權行為或其他原因，均不超過10 . 00美元。 -
By entering the promotion, entrant or, in the case of a minor, his her parent or legal guardian releases and shall procure his her nominees to release hktb and any of its directors, officers, employees, agencies and sponsors collectively, the " released parties " from any liability whatsoever, and waive any and all causes of action, for any claims, costs, injuries, losses, or damages of any kind arising out of or in connection with the contest or the use of the prize and related activities including, without limitation, claims, costs, injuries, losses and damages related to personal injuries, death, damage to or destruction of property, rights of publicity or privacy, defamation or portrayal in a false light, whether intentional or unintentional, whether under contract, tort including negligence, warranty or others
參加本推廣活動，即表示參賽者如參賽者並未成年，則為參賽者之父母或其合法監護人就由於或關於是次比賽或獎品的使用及相關活動而根據合約侵權包括疏忽保證或其他基礎提出的任何種類的申索費用傷害損失或損害賠償包括但不限於有關人身傷害死亡財物損毀公開或私隱權利有意或無意誹謗或失實描述的索償費用傷害損失或損害賠償，免除並促使其提名人士免除旅發局及其任何董事高級職員雇員代理及贊助商統稱獲免責人士的任何責任及放棄任何及所有訴訟因由。 -
The government of hksar, the telecommunications authority and ofta shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, special or consequential losses or damages ( including, without limitation, damages for loss of business or loss of profits ) arising in contract, tort or otherwise from the use of or inability to use this web site, or any material contained in it, or from any action or decision taken as a result of using this site or any such material
香港特區政府、電訊管理局局長及電訊局不會對使用或無法使用本網頁或其中所載資料或就使用本網頁或其中任何資料所採取的任何行動或作出的決定引起直接、間接、特殊或相應而生的損失或損害（包括但不限於業務損失或溢利損失）負上法律責任。
分享友人