burden of producing evidence 中文意思是什麼
burden of producing evidence
解釋
舉證的責任-
In the second part, the author defined the proper plaintiff and burden of producing evidence thereof by deferent means. in the third part, the author examined the damages and the method of computation therein from the status quo of scholarship. in the last part, this article thought that the limitation of actions should be accounted from dies a quo when the decision on punishment of securities supervision commission is published by the company in punishment or by the commission itself
關于計算方法，本人認為應以均價法為宜，即證券買入或賣出價格與上市公司對其虛假陳述進行更正之後的10天或從揭露日至該流通股換手率達到100 %之日止的這段時間期限內的平均交易價格之間的差額進行計算，如果原告在上述期限內賣出股票，則按證券賣出的實際價格計算，否則按平均收盤價格計算。 -
On account of the circumstances, this article attempts to study the system of burden of proof and the principle of its allocation in the collision actions, and then, based on the character of legal system in china and theories of maritime judgement, it tries to analyse the international regulations for preventing collisions at sea, 1972, dig out some problems and put forward some idio - points of view. in the last section of this thesis, the author analyses and inquires into how to institute a rule of burden of producing evidence for collision actions in our country and deems which is propitious to keep the development of shipping in order
有鑒于上述現狀，本文立足於本國法制特徵，在先輩的民事舉證責任制度理論成果基礎上，借鑒英美典型海事判例確定的舉證責任原則，對船舶碰撞中的舉證責任及其分配製度進行了考察；並從舉證責任分配規則的理論角度對1972年《國際海上避碰規則》進行了大膽的評析，在發現問題的基礎上提出了一些個人的觀點，以作為海事司法實踐的參考。 -
One ( the burden of producing evidence ) shifts, the other ( the burden of proof ) does not. based on the result of comparative research, this thesis tries to study the relevant question in china
就我國來講，從以前簡單從提供證據的責任論文摘要、中文）作為該領域問題的主導思想，到最新的司法解釋確立證明責任解決問題的思想，我國的理論和實踐都已經發生了相當的變革。 -
As the consummation of the social ist marketing economy system, the evidence rule should be correctly applied to direct the civil and commercial arbitration practice, each party " s burden of proof should be reasonably distributed, the direct relation between parties producing evidence and the arbitral award should be intensified, and the system of the parties producing evidence should be ensured, therefore, the system of the burden of proof can give its full play
因此，在仲裁程序設計l ! 『 ，具有一銘套能夠保障當事人履行舉誡責仟的拈施和手段，並山此而形成保障舉證責任祝以落實的常規機制，已成為仲裁理論』川水婦湃究的重要內容。對此，我認為應』 『訂l :建眾指濘、 』勺事人舉誡制 -
It is not many scholars to clearly prove the opinion of shifting the burden of proof, on the contrary the contradictory scholars are more prominent, for example the vice professor of southwest politics and law university, chengang, wuyue who translates and introduces the burden of proof of germany, because them there are more and more people support the opposite opinion, while in the draft of " civil evidence code ", the traditional idea win, in this draft the legislator abides by the present justice and our country ' s native circumstance, they made an scientific choice, of course, the burden of proof will directly influence the party " s possibility of losing the lawsuit, while the regulation of shifting the burden of proof increases the plaintiff ' s opportunity to win a lawsuit. to explain what is the shifting of burden of proof, the paper use the civil law as the example to point out the " reverse " is not entirly relieve the plaintiff s obligation of producing evidence, but in certain extent and in certain range make the defendant bear the burden of producing those proofs from the reverse way, which are originally beard by the plaintiff. in the three proceeding law, shifting the burden of proof have some differences, but the interior spirits are coincident - for the values of social justice and the legal reason
論證舉證責任倒置的學者觀點明確並且論證十分充分的不多，相反卻是對此著書立說予以反駁的學者較為突出，如西南政法大學的副教授陳則博士，翻譯並介紹德國證明責任學說的吳越先生均是目前國內對舉證責任倒置持否定態度的代表人物，由於他們的推動使得國內持此說的人越來越多，但在《民事證據法（草案） 》的擬定過程中，並未采責任倒置的地位，這樣的立法選擇是建立在對我國法律實現的本土環境客觀認識的基礎上的科學選擇，誠然，舉證責任的分配直接影響到當事人在訴訟中的敗訴風險，而「倒置」規則的設計，則在此問題上增加了原告勝訴的籌碼，在理解何為舉證責任倒置時，本文著重以民事法為主線，指出這種「倒置」並非全部免除原告的證明責任，而是在一定范圍與一定程度上將通常應由原告負擔的舉證責任轉由被告從反方面承擔，舉證責任倒置在三大訴訟法中所體現的具體情形有所差異，但它們的內在精神是一致的?法律的理性與社會公平價值，在民事訴訟中舉證責任倒置的情形，一般總是將其局限於特殊侵權情形，而忽略了民事合同違約責任的訴訟中的原告也無須對被告應承擔違約責任的所有要件，對被告主觀上的過錯實行推定，若被告予以否定則應對其無過錯的證據舉證，在設置舉證責任倒置的規則時，從各國的立法經驗與法的內在價值要求可以總結出以下幾個原則:程序法與實體法結合原則，公平原則，訴訟經濟原則，保護弱者原則等，基於此完善舉證責任倒置的規則時首先應肯定舉證責任倒置的概念，其次立法應避免求大求全，再次要配合實體法的發展，最後還可以在司法領域嘗試判例的指導意義。 -
On the burden of producing evidence and the burden of proof
論舉證責任與證明責任 -
On burden of producing evidence and burden of proof
論公安司法機關的舉證責任與證明責任 -
The presumption has transferred only the burden of producing evidence, not the burden of persuasion
其中，推定轉移給被告人的僅僅是提供證據責任，而並不轉移說服責任。 -
In order to resolve the above contradiction, the burden of proof was divided into the burden of producing evidence and the burden of persuasion
為了解決這一矛盾，證明責任開始分化為提供證據責任與說服責任。 -
In practice, japanese court sustains that the " tail to perform due contractual obligations " should be the standard in determining liability, while most of the other countries follow the general causation principle in tort by contrast, this article will show that, since both of them apply " duty of care " as the standard, in effect the burden of producing evidence is of little difference in either case
筆者認為，由於兩種責任在認定醫療過失時均以違反注意義務為要件，在舉證責任上也差別不大，因此明確醫生所負有的合理技能與適當注意義務的性質及其程度才是問題的關鍵所在。醫療過失認定標準的特殊性部分，重新認識了傳統侵權法中判斷過失基準的「合理人」標準。 -
In ownership returning petition right of, this part analyzes the principal components, content and burden of producing evidence of ownership returning petition right and probes whether the returning petition right shall be independently transferred. the author holds that the returning petition right shall not in nature be independently transferred
在所有物返還請求權中，分析了所有物返還請求權的構成要件、內容和舉證責任，並對返還請求權可否獨立讓與的問題進行了探討，認為返還請求權依其性質不存在獨立讓與的問題。 -
Parties " claims must be based on corresponding evidence rules and denying or refuting opposite parties should also produce evidence ; the other is the classification rule for legal norms, that is, the rule that the party who sets up a claim should produce evidence cannot solve the problem of how to distribute the burden of proof when the question in dispute is not clear and parties of both sides are incapable of producing evidence
當事人提出主張必須有相應的證據規則，基於一定事實對對方的主張予以否定或反駁的也應提供證據。二是法律規范分類規則，即主張者舉證規則不能解決當爭議事議不明而對方當事人亦無力予以證明時如何分配舉證責任的問題。況且在這種情形下法院也不能以事實無法查清為由不作裁決。 -
The core of the principles of imputation is the allocation of the burden of producing evidence
歸責原則的核心是過錯舉證責任分配原則。 -
The distribution of burden of proof and burden of producing evidence and its accomplishment under the background of criminal procedure reformation
刑事訴訟改革背景下證明責任與舉證責任分配及其完善 -
For example, in both the legal systems, the burden of producing evidence is the " ramification " of the burden of proof
通過比較可以看出，無論大陸法系還是英美法系，舉證責任（提供證據責任）都是證明責任在訴訟中的「派生」 。 -
This article expounds the burden of proof from 3 aspects : the general principal of evidential burden of administrative action, the allocation of burden of evidential burden and the time limit of burden of producing evidence. it introduces some related western theories concerning evidential burden, analyzes and evaluates the good points and short - comings of our country ' s evidential burden of
在研究這些問題時，介紹了西方國家對舉證責任的相關理論，分析評價了我國行政訴訟舉證責任理論的長短得失，指出了西方國家理論及我國刑事、民事舉證責任理論對行政訴訟舉證責任理論的借鑒意義，並提出了理論研究與立法的完善對解決行政審判實際問題的意義。
分享友人