drawing on the definition 中文意思是什麼

drawing on the definition 解釋
根據定義作圖
  • drawing : n 1 延引，牽引；引誘。2 抽簽；拈鬮。3 【機械工程】拔絲；沖壓成形。4 描畫，制圖；圖，圖形；素描；...
  • on : adv 1 〈接觸、覆蓋〉上去；開（opp off）。 turn on the light [radio water gas] 開電燈[收音機、自來...
  • the : 〈代表用法〉…那樣的東西，…那種東西。1 〈用單數普通名詞代表它的一類時（所謂代表的單數）〉 （a） 〈...
  • definition : n. 1. 限定。2. 定義，界說。3. 明確。4. （透鏡的）明晰度。5. （收音機的）清晰度。6. （印花）輪廓。
  1. The current public prosecution mode in our country took shape from the past whole case - examine mode in the base of the thinking to get ride of the drawbacks in the past. in practice, it has not only become effective and cause out a lot of new defaults, for example, the definition of the main evidence is not clear, the transfer range of the case files is unclear and the stipulate of the examine consequence is not enough. in order to reform and perfect the current public prosecution mode, we should regard the theory of the public prosecution as guide, combine our country ' s conditions, on methodology jump out of the circle relatively drawing lessons from the past, on the procedural theory, change the idea that the forejudge caused from the substantive examination and clarify the objective fact the current public prosecution include the essential substantive examination, in practice regard legitimacy, rationality and flexibility as the principle of law enforcement before the law to revise, in legislation define the concept of the main evidence clearly, add the regulation to dispatch the examine judge and the trial judge, regulate the treatment methods after examination and revise some rules about the summary procedure

    以公訴審查制度的訴訟理念為指導，結合我國的國情，對現行公訴審查模式的改革和完善，在方法論上跳出以往比較借鑒的圈子；在訴訟理念上改變過去庭審法官預斷必然緣于實體性審查的觀念，以澄清現行公訴審查模式包括必要的實體審的客觀事實；在實踐中以合法性、合理性和靈活性作為立法修改前的執法原則；在立法上明確界定主要證據的范圍是對證明犯罪是否成立起主要作用或有重要影響的證據，其中既包括有罪證據也包括無罪證據，增加規定公訴審查法官與正式庭審法官分立制度，補充規定對公訴審查后開庭審理之外的其它情況的處理方法以及對於人民法院在審理過程中發現不宜適用簡易程序的，取消原刑訴法應當按照一般公訴案件適用的普通審判程序重新審理的規定，改為由審理該案件的獨任審判員以外的審判員重新組成合議庭對該案件進行重新審理等。
  2. This thesis regards choice mode of basic asset of credit asset securitization as study entry, using the relevant principles in disciplines such as economics, finances, investments, financial engineering, theory of probability and mathematical statistic and commercial bank management, etc., drawing lessons from analysis tools and research methods of predecessors, through summarizing relevant concepts and principles, earning and risk of credit asset securitization, outlines a general definition of credit asset securitization and draws importance of choosing basic asset of credit asset securitization on this basis

    本文將信貸資產證券化基礎資產的選擇模式作為研究切入點，運用經濟學、金融學、投資學、金融工程學、概率論與數理統計和商業銀行管理等學科的相關原理，並借鑒前人的一些分析工具和研究方法，通過對信貸資產證券化的相關概念及原理、收益與風險的分析，對信貸資產證券化作一個總的界定，並在此基礎上引出信貸資產證券化基礎資產選擇的重要性。
  3. This thesis is divided into five parts. in the first part, through the comparison between mortgage and the pledge rights, and drawing lessons from wang limin ( professor of china people ' s university ) ' s idea, the author gives a definition to the pledge rights : it ' s the rights that when the debtor does n ' t fulfill his obligation, the creditor can be given the legal rights to take possession of a house or some other property as a security for payment of money lent. then the author makes further explanation to the pledge rights from the which analyzes the legal meaning of returing the security wantonly, although the supreme court made it clear that " after the creditor returned the security to the debtor, and comfronts the third person based on the pledge rights, the court will not support it ", thecourt did n ' t explicit whether the pledge rights dies out or is invalid. the author poses out when in this situation, the pledge rights dies out

    如在論述動產質權實現條件時，分析了我國《擔保法》第七十一條的不足之處並提出了自己的見解：職權人只能在非自身的原因未能受到清償時才能實現其質權；質權實現時質物價值超過約定價值的部分應歸出質人所有；而質權人怠於行使質權而使質物價值下跌的，質權人應承擔賠償責任。再如在分析任意返還質。物的法律意義時，針對最高人民法院盡管在其司法解釋中明確了「質權人將質物返i 」 a碩士學住論文v不示yw訂比』 sn正狠還于出質人後，以其質權對抗第三人的，人民法院不予支持」 ，但沒有明確此種情況下，質權是消滅還是無效的缺陷，筆者提出了質權人將質物返還于出質人或質物所有人的質權消滅的觀點。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書