english legal system 中文意思是什麼
english legal system
解釋
英國法律制度-
It is a new style that the contractual law contains breach and fundamental breach of contracts that are belonging to english and american legal system
其中，將屬于英美法系制度的預期違約，根本違約規定在合同法中，屬于合同法全新的內容。 -
Eclectic capital system mode is produced by adapting some advantages of authorized capital system mode of english and american legal system on the foundation of legal capital system
本文認為，實行單一的法定資本制度模式。單一的授權資本制度模式或單一的折衷資本制度模式都不是我國 -
Authorized capital system mode is the main capital system mode in corporate legislation adopted by english and american legal system countries. it implies that the total established capital in corporate regulations does not need to be totally issued, subscribed and paid before the establishment of corporations
授權資本制度模式是英美法系國家的公司立法所主要採取的資本立法模式，它是指公司章程中所設定的資本總額無需在公司成立前全額發行、認購並足額交付的法律制度。 -
Ln light of nida ' s " functionai equivalence ", this thesis mak6s a comparative study of corresponding extracts from two english versions of the contffict law of the pr. c. ( published by china legal system pubiishing house and foreign languages press respectively ). the aim is to find practical approaches which wili lead to the closest natural equivaience in the tafget ianguage in c - e legal translation, meanwhiie, some merits as well as demerits of the two english versions in terms of translation are investigated
本論文依據奈達的翻譯理論對《中華人民共和國合同法》兩個中英對照本（ 1999年分別由法制出版社和外文出版社出版）的英譯文進行了比較研究，目的在於探索在中文法規英譯中實現「最切近而又自然的對等」的有效方法，同時探討《中華人民共和國合同法》英譯文在翻譯方面的某些可取或不當之處。 -
Newday sunshine interpreter team is set up in the golden fall of 2006, which is oriented to media the east and the west legal system, culture and law spirit, and to provide accurate, efficient and timely consultancy service on legal english, laws and regulations, and legal documents etc
日新翻譯團隊致力於媒介中西方的法律制度，文化和精神；為國內，國際的客戶提供準確，高效及時的法律英文，法律制度以及法律文件方面的咨詢和顧問服務。 -
After comparing english legal system and continent legal system ' s diffirrent principal model and value inclination, analysing china principal model ' s rationation and drawback, the text think that law should adopt the principal model dominated by administration organism and subordinated by law court. law court only examine and execute those case that are important to the party to a lawsuit or difficult to renew
在對英美模式及德奧模式兩種不同的主體模式及其價值取向進行比較，及對我國強制執行主體模式的合理與不足進行分析之後，認為我國應當採取行政機關自行執行為主導，法院審查執行為補充的主體模式，在劃分執行權限時，法院主要審查執行那些對相對方權益影響較大或執行后難以恢復的案件。 -
Because our legal system belong to the common law, but anticipatory breach is the characteristic of english - american law, can anticipatory breach solve the problems in common law ? when the anticipatory breach is introduced, are there conflicts in the institution ? how to improve the anticipatory breach with these projblems with some faults and shortcomings ? this paper inquires these things in three parts. starting bread with the two outside forms of the auticipatory and the two outside forms of the auticipatory non - permermance, the first part of the passage inquires the value and the orcial base of the anticipatory breach by surveyingjit ' s origination and changing process under the origination and changing process under the special historical background. by comparing the anticipatory breach with counterargument right for security, the second part states a viewpoint that the former is superior is superior to the latter in protection parties " lawful rights though there are many similarities and differences between them. from this, we can come to a comclusion that the counterargument right for security is no substition for conticipetory breach and that the former should be part of the latter. the third party gives a detailed explanation of anticipatory breach in english ? american law systems in chinese system of anticipatory breach. finally, the anther makes some important suggestion : first, the subject of counterargument right for security should be attend to either party of the contract
其價值在於使受害方能提前獲得法律上的救濟，防止其蒙受本來可以避免的損失。第二部分筆者通過對預期違約與不安抗辯權的比較研究，對我國《合同法》應如何處理、協調來自不同法系的這兩項並不完全相同的法律制度的關系提出了自己的觀點。筆者認為不安抗辯權是通過對合同利益期待權的保護，實現法律「公平」和「安全」的價值，而預期違約除標示上述價值目標外，更是法律對「效率違約」這一經濟理論的認可，顯示了法律對「效益」這一價值目標的追求，從而提出預期違約與不安杭辮權二者制度功能相似而制度構造不同，預期違約制度較之不安杭辮權更有利於保護當事人的合法權益，由此得出我國《合同法》中不安抗辮權不僅不能替代預期違約，而是預期違約應該吸納不安抗辮權的結論 -
Hong kong s legal system is separate from mainland china s, and english common law prevails
香港法例以英國普通法體系為基礎，有別于中國的司法制度。
分享友人