fact-based thinking 中文意思是什麼
fact-based thinking
解釋
事實型思維-
The common characteristic of the traditional theories about the act researches is researching the concept of act in criminal law with the restrained thinking way of monism, i. e. onefold factual, onefold valued, or fact - value integrative methodology, which result in that it can not explain some especial act forms in the criminal laws, that it only explain those narrowly but can not withstand careful analysis, or that it only extends to explain all kinds of act forms, which does not accord with the daily thinking manners. this paper recognizes and redefines the concept of act in the research of the criminal law based on the suspicion and consideration of research methodology, in a fact - value segregative dualistic thinking way, in relation to analyse and comprehension of characteristic of some special act forms, such as " holding ", " omission "
傳統的行為理論的研究都有這樣一個共同的特點，即局限於一元論的思維方式，以單純事實的，單純價值的，抑或事實? ?價值一體化的方法論，來研究刑法理論中的「行為」概念，結果導致要麼是無法解釋刑法上特殊的行為形式，要麼只是表面上牽強附會卻經不起深入推敲，要麼僅追求能有張力地解釋各種行為方式卻脫離了人們認識的思維習慣。本文正是基於對研究方法的質疑和反思，採用事實? ?價值分離的二元論思維方式，結合分析理解「持有」 、 「不作為」等刑法中特殊行為形式的特徵，重新認識和界定了刑法理論研究中的「行為」概念。 -
Firstly, the author refers that the premises of defining " act " is the change of research thinking manner and discusses concept separation based on two layers, the prototype of the crime and the model of the crime, with an eye of fact - value segregative dualistic thinking way
筆者首先指出界定「行為」概念的前提是要轉換研究該問題的思維方式，並就事實?價值分離的二元思維下的犯罪原型和犯罪模型層面的劃分問題作了具體論述，然後分別就不同層面的行為概念? 「自然行為」 、 「犯罪行為」 、 「刑法上的行為」的具體內涵提出了筆者的見解。 -
Fact - based thinking
事實型思維 -
But by absorbing the reasonable viewpoint of eliminating the fact / value dichotomy, going in line with the standard of rational acceptability extended by humans ' ecological practice and being based on the analysis of the complex relations of fact and value in life community, rather than by following the traditional deductive model of justification we can create a way of justification with nonlinear thinking and integrative arguments, and thus we can not only avoid " the naturalistic fallacy ", but also put forward a non - logical justification for ecological ethics
但通過吸納社會領域消解事實與價值絕對二分的合理主張，並根據人類生態實踐而擴展道德論證的可合理接受性標準，在分析生命共同體中事實與價值的復雜關系的基礎上，創設一種非線性思維的綜合論述的證明方式，而不是沿用傳統的演繹模型的證明方式，就既可以避免「自然主義謬誤」 ，又能夠對生態倫理學做出一種非邏輯形式的合理論證。 -
The first part : based on formed and basic concepts of exploratory experiment teaching, physics teaching goals of middle school and functions of exploratory experiments, we have defined the exploratory physical experiment of the middle school, compared exploratory physics experiment and traditional experiments, proceeded from the teaching theory and studying theory, expound the fact that the theory foundation of the exploratory physics : j. piaget " s cognition - development theory, bruner " s cognition - discovery theory and constructionism, combining the teaching goals of middle school experiments, gived the teaching goals of exploratory physics experiment : observation ability, thinking ability, operating ability goal and emotion attitude goal, and explained each goal concretely so that the exploratory physics experiment has an object in view
論文第一部分根據探索性實驗教學思想的形成和發展的基本觀點、中學物理實驗的教學目標以及探索性實驗的功能，對中學物理探索性實驗作了界定，並對探索性物理實驗與傳統實驗進行比較，並從教育理論和學習理論出發，論述探索性物理實驗的理論指導依據：皮亞傑的認知?發展學說、布魯納的認知?發現學說以及建構主義的學習理論，同時結合中學物理實驗的教學目標探討了探索性物理實驗的教學目標：觀察能力、思維能力、操作能力目標和情感態度目標，並且具體外化每個目標，以使探索性物理實驗有的放矢。 -
Finally, based on china ' s fact and development rule, referring to the successful experience of international value - based management, it attempts to present basic thinking on the countermeasures about china ' s listing company value development
最後，基於我國實際情況和發展規律，借鑒國際價值管理成熟思想和方法，嘗試性的提出了實現我國上市公司價值成長相應對策的思考。
分享友人