issues and answers 中文意思是什麼

issues and answers 解釋
問題和答案
  1. What we need is to conduct various drastic reforms that are necessary and to channel our best efforts to educate the younger generation so that they may at least be well equipped to face critical issues and problems head on, seriously and courageously, and to have the open hearts and minds to join hands to search and work together for possible answers and solutions for mankind

    我們擁有的是一個資源與能源陸地海洋與大氣都有限的地球,我們面對的卻是充滿巨大困難與挑戰的世界。困難與挑戰,正是無限生機與希望的所在。我們所需要的,是大刀闊斧的從事各種改革與努力,以及教育我們的下一代,讓他們認真的面對人類必須共同解決的重大課題。
  2. In order to put our standardization, stabilization and specialization into practice as well as building up a relatively quiet place for all our members, we implement chatting rule strictly, i. e. the questions and answers for specific documentation issues are encouraged, while long - time meaningless chatting and making clamors are refused

    為實踐群的規范化、穩定化和專業化,也為群成員提供較清靜之地,本群實行嚴格的群聊規定:即本群嚴格貫徹專業外貿交流的精神,提倡專業問答,專業溝通,拒絕無故長時間閑聊,拒絕無聊喧鬧。
  3. The answers to these questions have important significance in thelegitimacy and sustainability of posner ’ s economic analysis of law, in theconnotation and extension of the definition of legal pragmatism and in theconsistency and compatibility of posner ’ s whole theory. it is not onlyrelated to posner ’ s economic analysis of law and his legal pragmatism, butalso related to the formation and development of posner ’ s whole theory. moreover, becauseofposner ’ sirreplaceablyimportantstatusinthesefields, it is even related to the whole field of economic analysis of law and legalpragmatism. however, the academe seems to have no recognition of the importanceof these issues, that most scholars ’ research on posner ( including domesticand foreign ) stillbasicallystaysinakindofsingle - anglemode, thatistosay, they either study posner ’ s economic analysis of law solely, or only discusshis legal pragmatism, ignoring the relationship between the two

    本文從波斯納對自己早先提出的經濟分析法學所作的前後兩種截然不同的辯護? ?一個是基礎主義的辯護,一個是實用主義的辯護;一個是建構基礎的辯護,一個是拋棄基礎的辯護? ?出發,通過對「經濟分析法學與功利主義」 、 「經濟分析法學與新蘭德爾主義」 、 「法律實用主義與形式主義」這幾對關鍵概念之內涵及相互關系的界定,並從波氏法律實用主義對其經濟分析法學的影響,以及波氏經濟分析法學對其法律實用主義的影響這兩個方面出發,對波氏法律實用主義與波氏經濟分析法學之間的關系進行了深入的剖析,由此證明了二者之間的聯系和可調和性。
  4. The fourth chapter provides answers to these questions. this chapter makes respective comparisons between conventions, laws, contract clauses and international shipping practices, represents in details their respective difference and relation, and discusses related issues o

    本章將公約、法律、合同條款與國際航運慣例分別進行比較研究,詳盡地闡述了各自的區別及關系,並結合典型案例對各部分的相關問題進行論述,明確了國際航運慣例的補缺作用。
分享友人