joint creditor 中文意思是什麼
joint creditor
解釋
連帶債權人-
1984 latin american countries held the cartagena conference and established a dialogue organ between debtor nations and creditor nations. this was their joint action for postponing their tremendous debt payments
拉美國家舉行卡塔赫納會議，建立了一個債權國與債務國的對話機構。這是拉美國家為拖延償還巨額債務的聯合行動。 -
All the debtors remain jointly bound to the creditor until the obligation has been performed completely. in the same time, joint debtors have exceptio rights to protect their benefits
債權人享有多重選擇給付請求權，債務人雖有一定抗辯權，但不得提出份額、順序的抗辯。 -
Where any of the shareholders of a company evades the payment of its debts by abusing the independent status of juridical person or the shareholder ' s limited liabilities, and thus seriously damages the interests of any creditor, it shall bear joint liabilities for the debts of the company
公司股東濫用公司法人獨立地位和股東有限責任，逃避債務，嚴重損害公司債權人利益的，應當對公司債務承擔連帶責任。 -
The creditor ' s right accrued as a result of being loaned by the collective ownership enterprise under guarantee by the state - owned enterprise and returned by the latter under joint liability because of the collective ownership enterprise ' s failure to repay, and it can be converted into state - owned enterprise ' s investment through mutual consultation
（二）集體企業由國有企業擔保借入資金后，由國有企業承擔連帶責任償還后形成的債權，集體企業無力償還的，經雙方協商，可轉為投資的資產。 -
The effect of joint obligation contains external effects as well as internal effects. external effects deals with the relationship between the creditor and joint debtors
在產生的依據上，直接適用法律規定是法定連帶關系產生的主要方式，法律規定「準用」也可產生連帶債務。 -
Joint debts in joint liabilities are important both in practice and theory. while the joint creditor ' s rights are not attached much importance to because of their rare applications in practice
連帶之債中連帶債務在實務上和理論上具有重要意義，連帶債權則因在實踐中較少運用，不被人重視。 -
Staring with the concepts and properties of joint liability, the author of this paper attempts to conduct studies with great emphasis the causes and effects of the joint debts and the creditor ' s rights, lists the current stipulations of joint debts in all our separate decrees, analyses the relationship and differentiations between the joint debts and the untruly joint debts, and finally proposes a few suggestions based on the current legislative situations
本文從連帶之債的概念及性質著手，著重分析了連帶債務、連帶債權的發生原因及其效力，羅列了我國各個單項法律就連帶債務規定的現狀，並分析了連帶債務與不真正連帶債務的聯系、區別，最後針對立法現狀提出了幾點建議。 -
Article 41 as to joint creditors, one creditor can represent all the joint creditors in the declaration of obligatory rights and they may also declare separately
第四十一條連帶債權人可以由其中一人代表全體連帶債權人申報債權，也可以各自申報債權。 -
Article 128 where one or more joint debtors are declared bankrupt, the creditor may take the total amount of its obligatory rights at the time of bankruptcy declaration as bankruptcy obligatory rights and exercise rights separately to each bankrupt person
第一百二十八條連帶債務人一人或者數人受破產宣告的，債權人可以其在破產宣告時的債權全額作為破產債權，對各破產人行使權利。 -
Joint debts mean that, if there are more than one creditor or debtor, each creditor is obliged to request the debtor ( s ) to pay back all liabilities, and vice versa, each debtor bears the full debt liabilities and is also responsible for the debts terminated after one - off payment
連帶之債指債權人或者債務人有數人時，各債權人均有權請求債務人履行全部債務，各債務人均負有全部給付的債務，且全部債權債務因一次全部給付而歸于消滅的債。 -
The form of non - essential joint and several liability can be classified and arranged by the regulation of permutation and combinations in maths. as a special responsible form, it has common with some people tort without joined intent, joint dangerous behavior, third person encroaching on creditor ' s rights, and so on
不真正連帶債務的形態可以用數學中的排列組合規律做出系統分類和整理;作為一種特殊的責任形態，其與無意思聯絡的數人侵權、共同危險行為、第三人侵害債權等既有共性，但又存在著顯著的區別。 -
The creditor of a joint obligation is entitled to demand total or partial performance from anyone of the debtors, or from several or all of them, simultaneously or successive
第四部分論述連帶債務的內外效力，是本文的重點。連帶債務的外部效力重在體現連帶債務制度的效率價值，側重於對債權人利益的保護。 -
Part two : prerequisite of joint obligation. the creditor and debtors of joint obligation have capacity of disposition in principle. but there are exceptions in special occasions
（三）各債務人各負全部給付義務，各債權人可依其意志向任一債務人主張債權，該債務人均不得提出「分擔利益」抗辯。
分享友人