judicial execution 中文意思是什麼
judicial execution
解釋
司法執刑-
It is closely related with other factors ( the traditional law culture of china, villager autonomy system, law enforcement and judicial administration in rural areas ) that also have effects on the rural rule - by - law course, and deeply affects rural legal operation in the fields of national especially agricultural legislation, farmer ' s voluntary abidance by the law, and the execution of law in rural areas
農民的法律意識在農村法治化進程中具有核心的地位和作用，它與中國傳統法律文化、村民自治制度、農村執法與司法狀況等影響農村法治化進程的其他因素互相聯系，互相影響，並從國家尤其是農業立法、農民自覺守法和農村中法律的適用這三個環節深刻影響著農村的法制運作。 -
The main subject of part three is the three aftermaths of international civil jurisdiction conflict : influencing judicial assistance between nations ; influencing the execution of court judgments ; and eventually influencing the realization of disputants " substantive rights
第三部分：國際民事管轄權沖突的後果國際民事管轄權的沖突，將導致一系列的法律後果。表現在：國家之間的司法協助關系受到影響；法院判決的承認和執行受到阻礙；當事人的實體權利難以實現。 -
The combination of the author now study circle in some kinds of theories, start with from the nature analysis of conducted behavior, the combination entire administration of justice of our country big environment, the conducted relief system in and conducted program nature, though carry out right have administrative and the double property of judicial, but the author last still trend in will carry out the nature location of right is judicial power, part 3 is on the foundation for the nature exposition of execution of authority, have carried out specific analysis for the partition of powers and functions of execution of authority
筆者結合目前學界中的幾種學說，從執行行為的性質分析入手，結合我國整個司法大環境，及執行程序中的執行救濟制度的性質，對執行權的性質進行了分析。盡管執行權具有行政性與司法性的雙重屬性，但筆者最終仍傾向于將執行權的性質定位為司法權。第三部分在對執行權的性質論述的基礎上，對執行權的權能劃分進行了具體的分析。 -
Aimed at the causes of the crime of inquisition by torture and confession - extortion, part iv probes into the measures of prevention and cure for it from six aspects as the following : converting creatively the traditional law culture and value concept ; adjusting the way of social control ; rectifying the tipstaff ’ s concept of law - execution and improving their professional quality ; regulating and consummating the litigation rules ; perfecting the law rules and regulations ; and guaranteeing the devotion of judicial resources
第四部分:針對刑訊逼供之成因，文章從創造性轉換傳統法律文化和價值觀念、調整社會控制方式、矯正司法人員執法理念和提高其專業素質、確立與完善訴訟規則、完善法網規制、加大司法資源投入等六個方面，探討了刑訊逼供犯罪的防治對策。 -
First, the author thinks that the ci should not be negated completely because its exis - tance has reasonableness in theory and applicableness in practice ; second, the author thinks that the ci is neither a criminal fundamental principle, nor only a sentence principle, but a criminal application principle guiding the sentence and execution of penalty ; third, on the basis of clear answer to the preceding problems, the author makes a demonstration of the relation between the principle of ci and the principle of suiting punishment to crime. thinking that they two, on the level of criminal application, condition each other to get equilibrium and serve the judicial criminal application together
首先，作者認為不應該對刑罰個別化全盤否定，它的存在有理論上的合理性及實踐上的可行性；其次，作者認為刑罰個別化原則既不是刑法的基本原則，也不只是量刑原則，而是指導量刑和行刑的刑罰適用原則；再次，在對前兩個問題進行明確回答的基礎上，作者對刑罰個別化與罪刑相適應的關系進行了論證，認為刑罰個別化與罪刑相適應在刑罰適用層面上相互制約、彼此平衡，共同服務于刑罰公正適用。 -
In fact, there is only one method of remedy of execution, in china. that is the objection of execution which is prescribed by the 208th item of civil procedural law and some correlative judicial explanation
我國現行的《民事訴訟法》關于執行救濟制度的規定，其實只有一種，即我國《民事訴訟法》 208條以及相關的司法解釋規定的執行異議制度。 -
The third part gives relevant legislation suggestions and strategies in three aspects in the light of the shortages of demurring patent tort. these suggestions and strategies are : 1 ) constitute law of anti - monopolization imitating countries that have advanced legislation of intellectual property rights to prevent patentee from abusing his rights ; 2 ) smooth the way of administrative law execution of patent and delimit properly the bounds between administrative law execution and judicial review ; 3 ) strengthen imitational communication and academic discussion in demurring patent tort and increase the strength of being in line with the world
第三大部分是針對目前我國在專利侵權抗辯問題上存在的不足之處提出了三個方面的立法建議及對策，一是效仿知識產權立法先進國家制定一部反壟斷法，防止專利權人對其權利濫用；二是理順專利行政執法途徑，正確界定專利行政執法與司法審查之間的界限；三是加強專利侵權抗辯方面的國際交流與理論探討，加大與國際接軌的力度，充分利用國際條約，最大限度地保護我國的國家利益。 -
Judicial identification refers to a kind of acts of checking evidence, during the course of action ， in which an identifier with expertise appointed or invitated by judicial organs after the application of the parties or without the application, with scientific technological methods complying with the provisions of the criminal procedure law, draws a judgment conclusion. [ 1 ] judicial identification serves the acts of investigation, procuratoration, justice and execution and serve their acts of collecting, examing and checking evidence, which is a link in judicial acts
司法鑒定是在訴訟過程中，對于案件中的某些專門性問題，按訴訟法的規定，經當事人申請，司法機關決定，或司法機關主動決定，指派、聘請具有專門知識的鑒定人，運用科學技術手段，對專門性問題作出判斷結論的一種核實證據的活動[ 1 ] 。司法鑒定是為偵查、檢察、審判、執行活動服務的，為其收集證據、審查核實證據，是司法活動中的一個環節或鏈條。 -
Securing judgment procedure is to protect the legal rights of creditor, under that aim, there also exist two direct aim, one is safeguard the execute of the judicial addict made in the future, the other is to avoid the unredemptive damages chapter 3 the type of civil securing judgment procedure this chapter researches into the type of civil securing judgment procedure and relevant legal basis in main countries, including the arrest and einstweligeverfugung in germany and japan, the juger en refere iprocedure and qrdanance sur requite in france, attachment, temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction in u. s, pre - judgement rremedies in britain, and property preservation and advance execution in china the civil securing judgment procedure system of france, u. s. and britain don t meet the situation and tradition custom of china, while the civil securing judgment procedure system of german and japan has deficiency the conclusion of this chapter is, we should reasonably reform current civil securing judgment procedure system of china, reconstruction the dual civil securing judgment procedure system under the division of property preservation and action preservaition chaptei4 court has the power of jurisdiction this chapter researches into the court which has jurisdiction to different kinds of securing
筆者認為，民事保全程序存在審理階段的保全程序和執行階段的程序，是特別的訴訟程序和執行程序兼容；民事保全請求權屬于廣義上的訴權；民事保全權屬于裁判權（司法權）和行政權並存；民事保全程序應當體現迅速原則、全面保護雙方當事人；權益原則、程序正當原則、保全措施的標的有限原則；民事保全程序的總目的是為了保護債權人的合法權益，其直接目的有二：一是保障將來執行文書的強制執行，二是：避免將來無法挽回的損失。第三章民事保全的類型本章對各主要國家關於民事保全的類型及其依據逐一作了論述：德國和日本的假扣押與假處分、法國的緊急審理程序和依申請作出裁定的程序、美國的， 、一。扣押和中間禁令、英國的臨時性救濟措施、我國的財產保全和先予執行。 -
This is what the research subject is going to demonstrate : theoretical value and practical significance. this article is composed of five parts, which first expounds the legislative process of article 306 and its present execution situation in judicial practice. through careful analyses of the constitutive characteristics of crimes of forging and destroying evidences, and crimes of impairing testifying by defenders and agents ad litem added in article 306 and some easily confusing problems when applying this article in
文章首先闡述了新刑法第三百零六條的立法過程，並以一定的數據說明該條文在司法實踐中造成的現狀，來分析新刑法第三百零六條增設的辯護人、訴訟代理人毀滅證據、偽造證據、妨害作證罪的構成特徵，分析司法實踐中適用該條文容易混淆的幾個問題，從而對該條文設置的合理性問題提出質疑和論證，並且提出廢止該條文和筆者對新刑法第三百零六條與第三百零七條進行整合的新見解。 -
In case that any party is under judicial age, the execution of this agreement shall be agreed or made by his legal guardian
如立契約書人有一方為未成年人，應得法定代理人同意。 -
Article 401 any judicial officer who, engaging in malpractices for personal gain, grants commutation of punishment, parole or temporary execution of the sentence outside prison to a criminal who does not meet the conditions for it shall be sentenced to fixed - term imprisonment of not more than three years or criminal detention ; if the circumstances are serious, he shall be sentenced to fixed - term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than seven years
第四百零一條司法工作人員徇私舞弊，對不符合減刑、假釋、暫予監外執行條件的罪犯，予以減刑、假釋或者暫予監外執行的，處三年以下有期徒刑或者拘役；情節嚴重的，處三年以上七年以下有期徒刑。 -
The first part is about international criminal judicial assistance. it discusses about the concept, scope and lawsuit features of international criminal judicial assistance ; the basic guideline of international criminal judicial assistance ; the development tendency of international criminal judicial assistance ; and some problems touched in international criminal judicial assistance, such as extradition, transfer of proceedings of a case, and recognition and execution of foreign rulings
上篇為國際刑事司法協助部分，論述了國際刑事司法協助的概念、范圍及其訴訟特徵；指導國際刑事司法協助的基本原則；國際刑事司法協助的發展趨勢；國際刑事司法協助中的引渡、訴訟移轉管轄、外國刑事判決的承認和執行等問題。 -
The actual meaning of the right of claim is to bring the civil subject about the basic right in substantive law for the execution of litigious right. it is the measure that the civil subject seeks judicial remedy
提出為了有效地保護知識產權，在我國法律上應當確立臨時禁令、消除危險、停止侵害、賠禮道歉和消除影響等知識產權請求權類型。 -
Restorative criminal responsibility needs and can obtain the reasonable annotation in elementary theory issues of criminal law, such as the law profit, crime essence, criminal activity legal relationship and legal responsibility : ( 1 ) the crime of violating the individual law profit is not the violation that aims at the abstract national or social entity, but aims at the individuals ; ( 2 ) " inspiring the authority " is not the basic task of the modern civil rights criminal law, maintaining victim ' s rights and interests and safeguarding that of criminal ’ s are “ two sides of the whole body ” of modern criminal law functions, neglecting any side at the same time inevitably enable the criminal judicature not to sink into region of the righteousness ; ( 3 ) in the concrete criminal activity legal relationship, the crime victim is the natural subject, the related country judicial organ is the subject of investigating the crime responsibility, or that of the judgment or execution, country in the overall significance cannot become the subject ; ( 4 ) repair and compensation of the crime harm is by no means a matter of civil liability, but is the basic entity burden of the legal responsibility which the criminal must shoulder
恢復性刑事責任需要且能夠在法益與犯罪本質、刑事法律關系及刑事責任等刑法基本理論問題上得到合理詮釋: （ 1 ）侵害個人法益犯罪並不是針對抽象的國家或社會實體的侵害，而是針對私人的侵害; （ 2 ） 「重振權力」不是現代民權刑法的基本任務，保障與維護受害人和犯罪人合法權益是現代刑事法功能之一體兩面，忽視任何一面勢必使刑事司法陷於不義之境地; （ 3 ）在具體刑事法律關系中，犯罪受害人是當然主體，有關國家司法機關是犯罪責任之追訴或裁判或執行主體，整體意義上的國家並不能成為主體; （ 4 ）犯罪損害的修復與賠償並非民事責任的事情，而是犯罪人應當擔負的刑事責任之基本的實體性負擔。 -
Practice of overseas restorative criminal responsibility and the exploration of the domestic restorative criminal responsibility indicates that, the realization of restorative criminal responsibility in our country should persist the principle of impartiality and legality, and that of fair and feasibility, and that of judicial monitoring, mainly carry on in the adjudication stage and execution stage, and carry on in the detection and prosecution stage limitedly
國外恢復性刑事責任之實踐與國內恢復性司法的初步探索表明，我國恢復性犯罪責任的實現應堅持公正合法、合理可行及司法監控的原則，主要在審判階段與執行階段進行，有限制地在偵查起訴階段進行。 -
The establishment of a complete set of the civil prosecutorial system and its effective operation and execution have no doubt a significant bearing on safeguarding the legality of judicial activities and upholding social fairness and justice
構建一套完整的民事檢察制度體系，並使之得以有效的運作和實施，這對于保障司法活動的公正性，促進社會公平和正義的實現，無疑具有重大的現實意義。 -
Some scholars insist that execution of authority have 3 powers and functions : execution order right, conducted judge right and conducted enforcement right, but because of carry out the administrative of right and the double property of judicial, three rights in carry out order right partition is worth for discuss, article have adopted two rights, will soon carry out the partition of powers and functions of right is conducted judge right and conducted enforcement right
有學者認為執行權具有三項權能：執行命令權、執行裁判權與執行實施權。但由於執行權的行政性與司法性的雙重屬性，三權中的執行命令權值得商榷。文章采納了兩權說，即將執行權的權能劃分為執行裁判權與執行實施權。 -
Criminal execution is the criminal judicial activity that judicial body executes the court ' s effective judgments
刑事執行是司法機關將人民法院生效判決、裁定附諸實施的刑事司法活動。 -
In the second part, the author analyses the existing issue and reason in the mutual procedure of the two kinds of power. at present, there exist three malice phenomena that are mutual filtrate, mutual evasion and mutual invasion, the author, after deeply analyzing our country ’ s history, cultural tradition, contemporary judicial system ’ s malady and the defects of administrative procedural system, rationally criticizes the malice mutual phenomena in the execution of administrative trial power and administrative power
闡析當前我國行政審判權與行政權互動過程中存在互相滲透、互相規避、互相僭越等三種惡性互動表現，從我國歷史、文化傳統、現行司法體制的弊端和行政訴訟制度存在的問題等四個方面深入剖析成因，特別是結合當前行政審判實際，對我國《行政訴訟法》頒布以來辦理案件情況進行分析研究，理性批判現實中行政審判權與行政權行使的惡性互動現象。
分享友人