jure 中文意思是什麼

jure 解釋
尤雷
  1. With an eye to the disjoint of law and practice, chapter 1 demonstrates that the adjudicative power shall belong to adjudicator de jure

    第一章著眼於法律的規定與現實的脫節,論證裁判權應當歸法定的裁判者。
  2. In this chapter, the author begins with the study of adjudicator de jure

    在本章中,筆者首先對法定的裁判者進行了研究。
  3. Then, the paper compares the characteristics of pegged exchange rate regime, free float exchange rate regime, and the regimes intervenient from the aspect of trading, policies, economic development, etc. the paper studies the effects of exchange rate regimes on macroeconomic in the different de jure and de facto classifications of regimes ; analyses factors affecting the selection of exchange rate regimes, and emphasizes on the capital mobility factor

    文章概括了匯率制度研究的不同視角並以此為基礎選定了本文的研究角度,然後從貿易、政策、經濟發展等角度比較了固定匯率制度和浮動匯率制度的特點,並對介於兩者之間的各種匯率制度的特徵進行了比較。接著,從匯率制度名義分類法和事實分類法等角度研究了各種匯率制度對經濟績效的影響。
  4. A member ' s national measures could violate non - discrimination obligation both overtly and implicitly. the overt violation always involves the national measures referring to the origin - based differentiation, while the implicit violation could exist in the context of origin - neutral national measures. the former situation will be called de jure discrimination, and the latter one is regarded as de facto discrimination, which gains attention in this article

    首先,成員國可能給予原產于不同產地的產品以差別待遇,對產品實施產地歧視( origin - baseddiscrimination ) ,我們稱之為「法律歧視( dejurediscrimination ) 」 ;另外,成員國還有可能根據非產地因素給予產品差別待遇,但是在結果上也導致了事實上對原產于某個(些)成員國的產品的歧視,我們稱之為「事實歧視( defactodiscrimination ) 」 。
  5. Chapter iv introduces the common doctrine that there is not a de jure stare decisis in the dsm according to the text of the wto, the viewpoint of appellate body and the allegation of some scholars, and then questions the reasons by which of the common doctrine excludes the system of stare decisis. this chapter continues to examine the practice of wto adjudic

    第四章首先根據wto的約文、上訴機構的觀點和學者們的主張,闡述了在wto爭端解決中不存在法律上先例制度的通說,並對學說上主張wto排斥先例制度的理由提出質疑,進而通過考察wto爭端解決實踐,得出了wto爭端解決中存在事實上遵循先例的結論,並進一步探討了在wto爭端解決中確立正式先例制度的意義和必要性以及諸先例之間的位階關系等問題。
  6. After demonstrating that adjudicative power shall be allocated to adjudicators de jure, the author discuses the disjoint of adjudicator de jure and adjudicator de facto in section ii of this chapter

    人民代表大會制度是我國的根本制度,人民代表大會是我國的國家權力機關,其他國家機關都是人民代表大會產生的,受人民代表大會監督。人民法院也不例外。
  7. The proposals aimed at preserving the adjudicatory committee do not overcome these malpractices. thus the adjudicative power of the adjudicatory committee but not the committee itself shall be canceled, and adjudicator de jure shall only be judges and people ' s assessors carrying out criminal trials

    根據司法獨立的要求,法官在從事審判時,要獨立於其上級和同事,任何人都不得對法官如何進行裁判作出指示,法官進行裁判的依據,只能是法律的明文規定和依法認定的案件事實。
  8. Those of the 1996 population by - census refer to the resident population enumerated under the de jure enumeration approach

    而列出的一九九六年中期人口統計的結果,則根據常住人口點算方法點算的本港居民人口。
  9. Directors of dltp includes de jure directors, de facto directors and shadow directors and third parties is composed of shareholders, creditors and some special creditors, such as governmental tr. x agencies, social security departments and corporate employees. the legal nature of dltp is special liability and different from liabilities mder tort, accordingly directors have to face both the liabilities under civil law and the special liabilities under corporate law. a director is not liable to third parties except that his or her action is illegal ; he or she is guilty of wrongful intent or of gross negligence for the illegal action ; the action occurs in the course of performing his or her corporate suties ; and third parties are damaged by the action

    作者指出,董事對第三人責任中的董事不僅指正式董事,而且還包括影子董事和事實董事;除了股東和一般債權人之外,第三人還包括二些特殊債權人,如稅務機關、社保機關以及雇員等;其責任性質為法定責任,但並不排除與民法侵權責任競合的可能;董事對第三人責任應包括以下要件: .董事之行為須違法、董事對其行為違法有故意或重大過失、董事之行為發生於執行職務過程中、第三人因董事之違法行為受損害;在舉證責任的分擔上應有董事證明其違法行為是否有故意或重大過失,實現這一制度的訴訟形式為第三人之訴;另外,在公司破產時應採取一些特殊措施,以保證公平受償。
  10. This article is divided into three main parts, introduction made by the first article to address the problem that our current commercial housing mortgage existence of the de jure applicability of the relevant norms, and therefore the need for the introduction of civil security system. in the first chapter, introduced to the history and evolution of the security system, the relevant provisions of civil law countries, common law mortgage system, and commercial housing mortgage on the country ' s current situation. chapter ii with the guarantee system to allow specific content to do a more detailed introduction

    筆者認為讓與擔保的定義應對讓與擔保的當事人、目的、讓與標的及當事人之間的法律關系作出較明確的說明並將讓與擔保界定為:讓與擔保是指債務人或第三人為擔保債務人的債務,將擔保標物的權利移轉于債權人,于債務清償后,標的物的權利應返于債務人或第三人,于債務不履行時,擔保權人可就擔保物優先受償的制度。
分享友人