law of tort 中文意思是什麼

law of tort 解釋
民事侵權法
  • law : n 勞〈姓氏〉。n 1 法律，法令；法典。2 法學；訴訟；司法界；律師（界），律師職務。3 （事物或科學的...
  • of : OF ＝Old French 古法語。
  • tort : n. 【法律】侵權行為。
  1. Sticking to the basic animus of tort law, grounding fundamental situation of our country and absorbing foreign useful theoretic productions and legislative experience properly, we relate the essence, types, responsibilities and types of tortfeasors of joint torts together organically. and the combination of them form a new and scientific institution of joint torts corresponding to today ' s social life

    在堅持侵權行為法根本宗旨的前提下，針對我國的基本國情，適當借鑒國外有益的理論成果和立法經驗，從共同侵權行為的本質、類型、責任及行為人的種類等方面來入手，將創門有機地統一起來，就構成了新的科學的符合當今社會生活的共同侵權行為制度。
  2. As to the law basic, the thesis analyses it from two main aspects : the foundation of contract law and the foundation of tort law. the foundation of cl is supported by theories of contract - breaking responsibility and misfeasance responsibility in contracting ; the foundation of tl is the civil tort liability and it gives the analysis to the causation and the principle of imputation when the civil tort liability is tenable

    對證券交易民事責任的法律根據，本文主要從合同法基礎和侵權法基礎兩方面進行分析，其中，合同法基礎就在於違約民事責任理論和締約過失責任理論，而侵權法基礎則為侵權民事責任理論，並對作為侵權民事責任成立基礎的因果關系和歸責原則進行剖析。
  3. On new tendencies of the choice of law for tort

    論侵權行為法律選擇方法的新取向
  4. Namely, the scholars in continental law system countries hold the two levels of causality : that is, causality at the level of establishment of tort liability and the level of scope of tort liability. regarding the liabilities determine, determine at the tow levels is adopted as well. because of the unique jury system, the liabilities determine in the anglo - american law system countries consists of two, namely, the determine of causality in terms of causation in fact and that of causation in iaw the dichotomy of causality in the law of tort not only specifies the tort liability but also limits the scope of the liability

    因果關系是侵權行為責任成立的必備要件，國外因果關系理論的「二分法」 ，即大陸法系國家學者將因果關系分為責任成立上的因果關系和責任范圍上的因果關系兩個層次結構，在責任認定上也採用了責任成立的因果關系的認定和責任范圍的因果關系的認定；英美法系根據其特有的陪審員制度，在因果關系的認定上分事實上因果關系的認定和法律上因果關系的認定。
  5. In common law countries, when cpa brings about damage to another person during his profession of auditing, different actions could be brought to the court subject to statutory law or tort law

    在普通法國家，注冊會計師在審計執業活動中給他人造成損害時，原告在制定法和侵權法下可以提起不同的損害賠償之訴。
  6. This dissertation, through discussing respectively and researching by comparative method as to the compensation for damages for breach of a contract and for the infringement arising from road traffic accident which is related to serve contract, raises that, there exist mutual part and difference in the scope of damages, the principle of the fixation of liability, the proof of evidence, the rule of the counteraction between faults, the undertaking of the third party for the fault liability, the dealing of the free - rider with good - faith, as to the contract law and tort law in china

    筆者在論文中，通過對具有服務合同關系的道路交通事故的違約損害賠償、侵權損害賠償的分別闡述和比較研究，說明了我國合同法和侵權行為法這兩種法律規范在賠償范圍、歸責原則、舉證責任、過失相抵規則適用、第三人過錯責任承擔、好意同乘者的處理等方面，既有相同之處，也存在諸多差異。
  7. The third part gives relevant legislation suggestions and strategies in three aspects in the light of the shortages of demurring patent tort. these suggestions and strategies are : 1 ) constitute law of anti - monopolization imitating countries that have advanced legislation of intellectual property rights to prevent patentee from abusing his rights ; 2 ) smooth the way of administrative law execution of patent and delimit properly the bounds between administrative law execution and judicial review ; 3 ) strengthen imitational communication and academic discussion in demurring patent tort and increase the strength of being in line with the world

    第三大部分是針對目前我國在專利侵權抗辯問題上存在的不足之處提出了三個方面的立法建議及對策，一是效仿知識產權立法先進國家制定一部反壟斷法，防止專利權人對其權利濫用；二是理順專利行政執法途徑，正確界定專利行政執法與司法審查之間的界限；三是加強專利侵權抗辯方面的國際交流與理論探討，加大與國際接軌的力度，充分利用國際條約，最大限度地保護我國的國家利益。
  8. When there is essential damage the creditor has the right to sue the third party for tort independently. in the practice of trial, it ' s more important to research the defense than the constitution. this paper introduced some ripe defense as reasonable behavior, justness dispute, lawful behavior, line of duty and inapplicability of tort law

    而英美法系則通過大量的審判活動積累了相當復雜的免責事由，但是由於判例法的傳統，要想總結所有的免責事由幾乎是不可能的，所以本文對于合理行為、正當競爭、合法行為、履行職責和不適用侵權法的行為等較成熟的免責事由做了一些簡單的介紹。
  9. The law of tort is common - law based

    侵權行為法以普通法為基礎。
  10. Law of tort

    民事侵權法
  11. The duty of tort ; c. the compensation for the result of tort. the theories of ecomomic analysis of tort law indicate that tort is a kind of action that tort - feasor breaches his duty and that the parties cannot reach an agreement in advance to solve the problem of compensation

    經濟分析法學的侵權行為經濟理論表明，侵權是一種給他人造成損害的失職行為，且對這一種行為的後果，相對人無法通過求助事先的合同來解決賠償問題，也就是說，事前談判的成本將是非常昂貴的。
  12. Writer ' s view of point is that delivery of cargo without original bills of lading has the character of breaching of the contract, because releasing cargo against original bills of lading is carrier ' s legal liability in carrying out the carriage of goods by sea. also it has the character of action in tort, as if the actions violate the civil law of liability in tort, the doer shall take on the liability of compensation. however when actions are both of breach and in tort, the chinese law gives the victim the rights to choose to sue in tort or of breach, but some limitations in applying substantive law

    第二章論述無單放貨的法律性質，筆者認為，無單放貨具有違約性，因為保證憑正本提單交付貨物是承運人在履行海上貨物運輸合同中的一項法定義務；無單放貨具有侵權性，只要無單放貨行為構成承擔侵權行為民事責任的要件，無單放貨行為人就必須承擔賠償責任；同時，無單放貨的違約性和侵權性可能構成責任競合時，我國法律允許受害人可以選擇一個訴因行使其請求權，但對實體法請求權的選擇，法律作出了一定范圍的限制；最後，無單放貨在某種程度上促進了航運業的發展，我們不能一概加以否定，無單放貨在特定情況下具有一定的合理性。
  13. It is the object of tort and has a special place in remedies of law of tort

    ?有人在?有法益受到侵害時享有救濟權，得請求損害賠償。
  14. The law of tort provides rules of conduct that regulate how members fo society interact and remedies if the rules are breached and damage is suffered

    侵權行為法提供行為規則，規范社會成員的相互交往以及在該規則被違反和損害發生是，如何進行救濟。
  15. Legality crisis of tort law - jurisprudence thought from liability for wrongs to liability without fault

    從過錯責任到無過錯責任變化的法理學思考
  16. Generally speaking, the duty of tort could be divided into two categories, one is " strict liability ", and the other is " negligent liability ". the latter is the main duty of tort law ; the former usually appears in some special fields and industries. as to the compesation that tort - feasor should pay for, it includes compensative damages and punitive damages

    「過錯原則」是侵權行為法的主要歸責原則，而「嚴格責任」主要適用於某些特殊的領域和行業，之所以在發生侵權的場合不能一律運用「嚴格責任原則」 ，原因在於這樣做的社會成本將大於社會收益，從而使得許多有益的社會活動成為不可能，結果是降低了社會的總體福利。
  17. In order to realize remedies of possession, general article of law of tort should be restructured

    在立法上應當通過重構侵權行為法一般條款來實現對?有法益之救濟。
  18. Recently, cases of numerous tortfeasors are common occurrence, whereas the current law of the joint tort is not integrated and systemic in our country, so that the joint tort is one of the parts of the law of tort needed to be discussed

    我們的立法應對共同侵權行為做怎樣的規定?司法在共同侵權行為制度的發展中又起了怎樣的作用?本文即對這些問題一一進行了探討。
  19. Meanwhile, the modern corporation law goes a step further, it puts forward that directors should also have a obligation of care stipulated in the general law of tort for corporation creditors. directors, together with the corporation, should bear the legal liability of tort if they fail to fulfill the obligation of care, thus cause damages to creditors " interests

    同時，現代公司法還進一步提出，董事對公司債權人還負有一般侵權法上的注意義務，董事在職務行為中違反注意義務，損害債權人利益的，也應同公司一起對債權人承擔侵權法律責任。
  20. The new development of pondering on the application in law of tort

    侵權行為法律適用的新發展
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書