legal-size 中文意思是什麼
legal-size
解釋
法定尺寸的-
They are all large - size and model companies taken as models, but not include companies which are unlimited liability and limited partnerships, because these are obvious differences on ideas of governance between the two kinds of companies. the former is based on the governing structure of legal person, adapts to modernization mass - production. but the latter is a kind of enterprise form based on human credit and reputation and it is identical to simple family and single house labor
另外還需特別指出的一點是，本文選擇研究的公司是以現代股份有限公司為藍本的大型規范公司，而不包括規模較小的無限公司和兩合公司，因為這兩類公司的治理理念是有顯著差異的，前者以法人治理結構為基礎，是與現代化大生產相適應的，而後者以人的結合為基礎，是與簡單的家族、家庭生產相一致的企業型態，它強調的是靈活與高效原則。 -
There are many factors for this problem, the most of which are : for clear disfigurements in the present financing system, there is a " squeezing out " effect in financing for small & medium - sized firms ; there are wrong ideas of financing support for those firms by the financial institutions, with insufficient efforts in supporting these firms ; these firms are characterized by a small size, weak strength, low credit, high risk, poor competition strength of financing ; there is no perfect legal systems to support and normalize the financing for them ; there is no sound institutions serving for these firms in access and guarantee, etc
導致中小企業融資難的因素有很多，其中最主要的是：我國現行融資制度缺陷明顯，對中小企業融資存在著擠出效應；金融機構對中小企業的融資支持存有誤區，支持力度不夠；中小企業自身規模小、實力弱、信用低、風險大，融資競爭力不強；支持、規范中小企業融資的法律制度不完善；為中小企業融資服務的評估、擔保機構不健全；等等。 -
We then discuss, from the perspective of economies of scale and economies of scope, the proper construction of the organizational and structural framework of a financial holding company and its subsidiaries to ensure that there is appropriate arrangement of the controlling - subsidiary relationship under the basic legal structure in respect of the size of business and the allocation of personnel in order to generate economic returns. the second chapter elaborates the financial holding companies and their subsidiaries, and seeks to provide possible solutions for challenges encountered. based on the author ’ s relevant experience in taiwan, this paper proposes a feasible arrangement of the organization and supervisory system for the board of directors, the supervisory board ( the board of corporate auditors ) and the management level, the underlying framework of which is mainly based on the regulatory structure of the us financial holding companies
第三章就監事責任及職權詳細研究，由於中國采大陸法系之立法，對監事責任之掌握較不具體，爰引述了英美受託義務（ fiduciaryduty ）之觀念進行分析，而就監事職權，相對的也是職責，則提出世界上較有表彰性的立法加以補充，希望可以填補其不足，最後比較監事會與獨立董事、審計委員會之各項功能，認為美國公司體制之董事會已漸將經營職能轉予首席執行官（ chiefexecutiveofficer ） ，而留下監督之職能，故可以審計委員會擔負監察職能之前置工作，而觀諸中國之社會經濟情勢，如徑予採行，將出現缺漏，故建議維持監事制度。
分享友人