national righteousness 中文意思是什麼
national righteousness
解釋
國家公義- national : adj 1 民族的；國民的；國家的；國民特有的。2 國家主義的；愛國的。3 國立的 國有的 國定的；全國性的...
- righteousness : 公義
-
Sacrifice oneself is taken justice, die to achieve virtue, kuangfu justice, place righteousness above family loyalty, national rise and fall, ordinary man has duty etc, it is the classical thought in chinese traditional culture, we ought to derive elite, eliminate about " gas " the scum on understanding, make debauchery money angry return their original position to go up, hold correctly in the person below, play gives their due effect, show their due glorious
捨身取義，殺身成仁，匡扶正義，大義滅親，國家興亡、匹夫有責等等，都是中國傳統文化中的經典思想，我們應當汲取精華，剔除關于「氣」的熟悉上的糟粕，讓酒色財氣回到它們本來的位置上去，在人的正確把握下，發揮出它們應有的作用，顯示出它們應有的光彩。 -
Restorative criminal responsibility needs and can obtain the reasonable annotation in elementary theory issues of criminal law, such as the law profit, crime essence, criminal activity legal relationship and legal responsibility : ( 1 ) the crime of violating the individual law profit is not the violation that aims at the abstract national or social entity, but aims at the individuals ; ( 2 ) " inspiring the authority " is not the basic task of the modern civil rights criminal law, maintaining victim ' s rights and interests and safeguarding that of criminal ’ s are “ two sides of the whole body ” of modern criminal law functions, neglecting any side at the same time inevitably enable the criminal judicature not to sink into region of the righteousness ; ( 3 ) in the concrete criminal activity legal relationship, the crime victim is the natural subject, the related country judicial organ is the subject of investigating the crime responsibility, or that of the judgment or execution, country in the overall significance cannot become the subject ; ( 4 ) repair and compensation of the crime harm is by no means a matter of civil liability, but is the basic entity burden of the legal responsibility which the criminal must shoulder
恢復性刑事責任需要且能夠在法益與犯罪本質、刑事法律關系及刑事責任等刑法基本理論問題上得到合理詮釋: （ 1 ）侵害個人法益犯罪並不是針對抽象的國家或社會實體的侵害，而是針對私人的侵害; （ 2 ） 「重振權力」不是現代民權刑法的基本任務，保障與維護受害人和犯罪人合法權益是現代刑事法功能之一體兩面，忽視任何一面勢必使刑事司法陷於不義之境地; （ 3 ）在具體刑事法律關系中，犯罪受害人是當然主體，有關國家司法機關是犯罪責任之追訴或裁判或執行主體，整體意義上的國家並不能成為主體; （ 4 ）犯罪損害的修復與賠償並非民事責任的事情，而是犯罪人應當擔負的刑事責任之基本的實體性負擔。
分享友人