object of civil right 中文意思是什麼
object of civil right
解釋
民事權利客體-
Therefore by using comparative analysis, this paper distinguishes the real right of natural resources from the real right on right nature, right object, right content and limited settlement, holding that the real right of natural resources is a kind of social rights and differs from the real right which has civil attribute
為此，運用比較分析的方法，嚴格區分了自然資源物權與民事物權的權利性質、權利客體、權利內容與權利的處分限制，認為自然資源物權是社會權，而不同於民事物權的私權屬性。 -
Of course, there are some exceptions in discussing the requirements of subrogation objects, this article firstly argues that subrogation is different from object of subrogation, and then thinks that the objects of subrogation should include creditor ' s right in rem right of the real claim subrogation right of rescission right of civil procedure and so on
在代位權客體要件里，本文先區分了債權代位權對債權代位權客體是兩個截然不同的概念，然後認為，代位權客體的范圍應包括債權、物權及物上請求權、債權代位權、撤銷權、訴訟上等權利，但是應排除專屬于債務人的三類權利和形成權。 -
The theory base of the lawsuit of the enforcement trace to source the civil trial. the object of the lawsuit of the enforcement is maily set apart two : one is the disputes between excution creditor and the excution debtor about whether or not the debt has been set off ; postponed ; died out after the judgment of the debt. this course of the condition lies that the judgement is delayed the reality of the case. another condition is that the stranger proposes right to the excution target. this course of the condition lies that the judgement of adversely proceeding is different to the reality of the case. the lawsuit of the enforcement can adjust the difference and can make the judgement showing no difference to the reality
執行異議之訴處理的對象主要存在於兩種情況下：一種是被執行人與申請執行人之間就執行依據所載權利在確定后是否已經消滅、延緩或者出現其他使執行受阻情況的爭議，這種情況存在的根源在於訴訟所解決的事實爭議相對于客觀事實發展往往有著一定的滯后性；另一種是執行第三人對執行標的主張權利，與申請執行人、被執行人產生爭議，這種情況出現的根源是訴訟中貫徹當事人主義所帶來的認定事實與客觀事實的偏差。 -
Valuation - analytically and real evidence - analytically, this dissertation carries out a systematic study on pre - emptive right from the perspective of jurisprudence and social science, coming straight to the point in the first chapter that from the angle of the history and law - and - economics, pre - emptive right incubates from its reasonable prusdence support and good social functions ; pre - emptive right is a civil privilege entitling the subject in specie to the first chance for purchasing the object ; and pre - emptive right is an expective right, a real right and a right in forms with attached condition
本文運用價值分析方法和實證分析方法，從法理和社會功能的角度，對優先購買權問題進行了系統的研究。第一部分就統領全篇地指出：從優先購買權的歷史發展和法律經濟學的角度來看，優先購買權的存在價值來自其強大的社會功能和合理的法理基；優先購買權作為一種特定主體依法所享有的在同等條件下優先於他人購買標的物的權利，在法律性質上為期待權、物權、附條件的形成權。 -
The constituting conditions include : object condition ( mainly applied to chattels, thing possessed under entrust ) ; subject condition ( the transferor is a person having entire ability of civil action and he is the legal person possessing the object ; the transferee cannot be a person with naught ability of civil action ) ; impersonality condition ( the transferor makes a transfer having no right, the transferee gets the practical possess of the property through a valid and costly trade ) ; subjective condition ( the transferee is in good faith )
善意取得制度的構成要件包括：客體要件? ?標的物主要是動產（佔有委託物） ；主體要件? ?讓與人為完全民事行為能力人、並且是標的物的合法佔有人，受讓人不能是無民事行為能力人；客觀要件? ?讓與人為無權處分、受讓人通過有效之有償交易行為而取得財產的現實佔有；主觀要件? ?受讓人善意受讓財產的交付。 -
Chapter three mainly discusses the subjects in exercise of the right of claim for stop, the object of the right, the causes for exercise, the terms of exercise, the procedure and methods of exercise and the limitations of subjects " qualifications, analyzing comparatively differences and similarities about the right of claim for stop in company law between the common law system and the civil law system
論文第三章從比較法的角度，主要剖析了公司法之停止請求權的行使主體和行使對象、行使事由、行使條件、行使程序和手段以及主體資格條件的限制，比較分析了兩大法系各國對公司法的停止請求權制度規定的異同。
分享友人