objective justice 中文意思是什麼
objective justice
解釋
目標與正義-
Procuration supervision is the special legal supervision of the state, whose essence is the restriction on the national power by the proceedings means, and the values " objective of the procural authority ( right ) is order and justice
檢察監督是國家專門的法律監督，其實質是依託訴訟手段對國家權力的控制和約束。檢察權的價值追求目標是秩序和正義。 -
In june 1998, a senior government counsel from the department of justice conducted a series of seminars and workshops for officers of the field audit group, the investigation unit and the appeals section. in addition, tax inspectors with duties, which include attending court hearings also, participated in the course. the main objective of the course was to provide the 100 participants with legal training, particularly in respect of evidential matters
為增強職員的法律知識，特別是關于證據方面的問題，本局在1998年6月邀請了律政司的一名高級政府律師為實地審查組、調查科和上訴組人員，以及需要出席法院聆訊的稅務督察舉辦研習課程，共有100名人員參加。 -
The first objective to come under the concerted attack of the social justice forces was to old problem of child labor.
社會正義力量協同斗爭的第一個目標，是童工這個老問題。 -
Along with the program justice reason is read striking root in the hearts of the people increasingly, and the program right suffers more and more concerns, and the program justly also becomes the important objective that the civil cases was sought, in any case but the most ultimate objective also not changing the civil cases activity is that it is just to realize the substance
隨著程序正義理念日益深入人心，程序權利受到越來越多的關注，程序公正也成為民事訴訟追求的重要目標，但無論如何也改變不了民事訴訟活動的終極目標是實現實體公正。對非法證據的一律排除是查明案件真相的巨大障礙，無益於民事訴訟實體公正的實現。 -
Let justice be our objective.
讓正義作我們奮斗的目標吧。 -
As to the question about the criminal legal object, the convicts but not the crimes became the problem that criminal judicial organization has to face up with. the traditional criminal judicature has a chroni c illness that it concerns only crimes and neglects criminals, so it can only ensure an objective external justice of same treatments to same actions and suiting punishments to crimes, but ca n ' t fully reflect the criminals " all kinds of complex subjective elements to make the application of criminal law the most appropriate crime controlling method. accordingly, the individualization of criminal law because of the focus of people ' s concern
在刑事法的對象問題上，犯罪人而非犯罪行為成為了國家刑事司法系統所要面對的課題，傳統的刑事司法存在著「見物不見人」的痼疾，因此只能保證同樣行為同樣對待、 「罪刑相適應」的客觀的、外在的公平，卻不能把犯罪人的各種復雜的主觀因素充分地反映出來，使得刑事法的運作能夠成為最佳的犯罪控制手段，因此，刑事法的個別化開始成為人們關注的焦點。 -
Based on the above understanding, the present article stars with the analysis of the basic legal theory of the civil protest regime, which includes : ( 1 ) the mechanism of the national peoples " congress as its political - constitutional grounds ; ( 2 ) the promotion of judicial justice as its axiological objective ; ( 3 ) the assurance of legitimate rights as its institutional goal ; ( 4 ) the civil procedural supervision as its basic function
二、民事抗訴制度的法理基礎和現實依據本部分首先從四個方面分析了民事抗訴制度的法理基礎，即：民事抗訴制度的憲政基礎是人民代表大會制度；民事抗訴制度的目的是司法公正；民事抗訴制度並非對私權的不當干涉；民事抗訴制度是審判監督制度的重要組成部分。 -
The present article understands that the improvement of the civil regime relies on insistence of the following principles : ( l ) the assurance of judicial justice, as to realize the axiological objective of the regime ; ( 2 ) proportional intervention, on interfering illicit civil activities, proportionality should be considered ; ( 3 ) procedural effectiviness, to achieve the maximum litigation effect with the minimum litigation cost specially for the cases in which technical defects are found, but in the mean time, common interest are not prejudiced, the promotion of civil protest may lead to an expenditure much higher than the litigation value, therefore, civil protest authority should not promote the civil protest
維護司法公正原則，是完善民事抗訴制度的重要原則之一，體現了制定這項制度的目的；適度干預原則在強調對違法民事行為進行干預的同時，指出這種干預應是適度的。抗訴的適度性體現在兩個方面：一是尊重當事人的處分權，二是維護法院裁判的既判力。訴訟效益原則指出，民事抗訴制度應以最少量的訴訟投入獲得最優化的訴訟效果，對于那些雖在技術上存在不足或缺憾之處但不損害公益的生效裁判，若提出抗訴可能導致人力物力的支出比裁判所涉及的訴訟標的額更大或造成當事人的無端訟累，抗訴機關不宜提出抗訴。 -
Therefore, we should establish a kind of justice system, which is scientific and conforms to the objective laws of trai l
這就要求國家確立一個科學的、符合審判規律和特點的法官制度。 -
And it is only the legal formal justice that is able to provide a tolerant society dependent on objective standards of haman behavious
（四）法治必然要求法的形式正義優先。 （五）法的形式正義保證了社會價值的多元存在。 -
Justice and order : puzzlement on ideal objective of law think on the viewpoint of edgar bodenheimer
關于博登海默觀點的思考 -
Witness not appearing in court influences judicial justice seriously and impedes the pursuit of proceedings value of objective truth
證人不出庭作證嚴重影響了司法公正，阻礙對客觀真實的訴訟價值追求。 -
So, justice belongs to the category of relation, value, social history and objective, and also it has its own range of adaptability
公正是一個關系范疇、價值范疇、社會歷史范疇和客觀的范疇，有其特定的適用范圍。 -
First, as using difference between " local government fiscal capacity " and " standard expenditure " as foundation to distribute the transfer payment fund, the degree of standardization is quite limited ; second, regression analysis mixes some unreasonable factors of old system, which makes this calculate way have serious shortcomings in technique ; third, this issue itself is also lack of objective and justice ; and fourth, because of the limited fund, the finance transfer payment system ca n ' t balance the fiscal capacity among regions
但這種方法也存在明顯的不足，用「地方財力」與「標準支出」的差額作為分配轉移支付資金的依據，規范化的程度十分有限；採用回歸法摻雜了一些老體制中的不合理因素，使技術方法有嚴重的缺陷；同時，財政轉移支付的資金十分有限，起不到地區間財力均衡化的作用。 -
If the fact that its judgment asserts or applicable law has mistakes, and we cannot allow correcting it absolutely, that won ’ t accord with justice. besides, pursuing substantive justice is the final objective of the criminal procedure
然而其裁判所認定的事實或者適用的法律有錯誤，若絕對不許糾正，則又與正義有背，且發現實體的真實，本屬于刑事訴訟之最終目的。 -
Our national proof standard ( i ? e ? the truth of a case must be clear and the evidences must be definite and ample. ) is the typical embodiment of objective reality. the standard of criminal testimony should give full consideration to such factors as the limitation and operatively of procedural justice, subjectivity, time and space, and resources
我國「案件事實清楚、證據確實、充分」的證明標準是客觀真實的典型體現，刑事證明標準應當充分考慮了程序正義、主觀性、時空和資源的有限性、可操作性等因素， 「排除合理懷疑」應當是我國刑事證明標準重構的最佳選擇。
分享友人