power of arrest 中文意思是什麼

power of arrest 解釋
拘捕權
  • power : n 1 力,力量;能力;體力,精力;(生理)機能;〈常 pl 〉才能。2 勢力,權力,權限;威力;政權;權...
  • of : OF =Old French 古法語。
  • arrest : vt. 1. 逮捕,拘捕,扣留。2. 止住,阻止,抑制。3. 吸引(注意)。n. 1. 停止,阻止,抑制;制動(裝置)。2. 逮捕,拘留,收押。
  1. If he possessed the power of arrest any wandering eye when exhibiting the glories of his altitude on foot, his equestrian graces were still more likely to attract attention.

    如果說,此人站在地上時由於他的身材長得高,易於惹人注意,那麼騎在馬上的雄姿,就更加吸引人了。
  2. Author does want to verify that it is reasonable that one court has the power to arrest a ship to secure the future judge or the letter of arbitration, while the jurisdiction is going on the other court esp

    闡明此時的實體審理和扣船可以在兩個法院進行.二是扣押船舶中涉及到的擔保。擔保問題是扣船制度中的重心。
  3. Securing judgment procedure is to protect the legal rights of creditor, under that aim, there also exist two direct aim, one is safeguard the execute of the judicial addict made in the future, the other is to avoid the unredemptive damages chapter 3 the type of civil securing judgment procedure this chapter researches into the type of civil securing judgment procedure and relevant legal basis in main countries, including the arrest and einstweligeverfugung in germany and japan, the juger en refere iprocedure and qrdanance sur requite in france, attachment, temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction in u. s, pre - judgement rremedies in britain, and property preservation and advance execution in china the civil securing judgment procedure system of france, u. s. and britain don t meet the situation and tradition custom of china, while the civil securing judgment procedure system of german and japan has deficiency the conclusion of this chapter is, we should reasonably reform current civil securing judgment procedure system of china, reconstruction the dual civil securing judgment procedure system under the division of property preservation and action preservaition chaptei4 court has the power of jurisdiction this chapter researches into the court which has jurisdiction to different kinds of securing

    筆者認為,民事保全程序存在審理階段的保全程序和執行階段的程序,是特別的訴訟程序和執行程序兼容;民事保全請求權屬于廣義上的訴權;民事保全權屬于裁判權(司法權)和行政權並存;民事保全程序應當體現迅速原則、全面保護雙方當事人;權益原則、程序正當原則、保全措施的標的有限原則;民事保全程序的總目的是為了保護債權人的合法權益,其直接目的有二:一是保障將來執行文書的強制執行,二是:避免將來無法挽回的損失。第三章民事保全的類型本章對各主要國家關於民事保全的類型及其依據逐一作了論述:德國和日本的假扣押與假處分、法國的緊急審理程序和依申請作出裁定的程序、美國的, 、一。扣押和中間禁令、英國的臨時性救濟措施、我國的財產保全和先予執行。
  4. In the study of prosecutorial supervision power, deep theoretical discussions must be carried out on such issues as the relationship between the prosecutorial power and the prosecutorial supervision power, the comparison of the prosecutorial power and the administrative and judicial powers, the relationship between the presecutorial power on the one hand and the public prosecution power, the power to approve arrest, the power to conduct investigations on the other hand

    在檢察監督權的研究中,許多基本問題還需進行深入的理論分析,如檢察權與檢察監督權的關系,檢察監督權與行政權、審判權的比較分析以及檢察監督權與檢察機關的公訴權、批準或決定逮捕權、偵查權的相互關系等等。對這些問題不作出理論解答,將對檢察監督權在司法實踐中的行使產生不利影響。
  5. It discusses the substantial condition of the pre - detention, and suggests that detention should be alienated from the arrest system in order to control judicial power. it also analyses the differences between the concrete technical mechanism of the pre - detention and arrest system. in part four, it introduces the tenet of the international human convention and how to re - constructing the principle of the pre - detention system in our country

    文章分為三大章,分別從審前羈押的實體構成上、程序功能層面上和程序技術設計三個方面對西方法治國家的法律控制體系中的正當程序抑制刑事強制措施權力層面,進行全面的比較法研究,而有意忽略法律控制體系中權利分配層面的比較法研究。
  6. However, the effect of rsf leads to the singularity of beam redius focused to zero with infinity laser intensity when the laser power is lager than a critical value in the absence of other effects. then, we anlyze the effect of higher order relativistic nonlinearity ( hor ) and find that this effect can arrest the singularity due to the effect of rsf

    因此,研究了高階相對論性非線性效應對激光傳輸的影響,發現高階相對論性非線性效應能夠抑制這種奇異性的出現;並對高階相對論性非線性效應與非傍軸效應作了比較,發現高階相對論性非線性效應起主要作用。
分享友人