rules of court 中文意思是什麼
rules of court
解釋
法院規則-
Rules of the district court amendment rules 2001
2001年區域法院規則修訂規則 -
Rules of the district court amendment rules 2004
2004年區域法院規則修訂規則 -
Secondly, this dissertation analyses the action characters of soccer robot, designs kinds of actions in allusion to switchover of attack and defend, puts forward theory of action selection and rules of action selection in order to realize part cooperation which combines court subarea and switchover of attack and defend when soccer robot is under special state thirdly, after considering the characters of obstacles in the robot soccer, we have founded the collision module, to the current questions of obstacle - escaping arithmetic, we put forward the new obstacle - escaping strategy based on the speed vector information which is able to dope out the potential obstacles in the moving path and count out the suitable velocity to escape obstacles by the aid of the geometry transform of obstacle velocity vector the grid implementation arithmetic of path - searching tree is set forth for the convenience the result of simulating competition showed that this way is suitable to the mobile obstacle escaping
（ 2 ）分析了足球機器人動作的特點，針對機器人足球比賽的攻防狀態轉變，進行了各類動作設計；為了使足球機器人在特定狀態下，實現局部的配合，將攻防狀態的變化與球場分區相結合，提出了足球機器人的動作選擇機理和動作選擇的規則。 （ 3 ）分析了機器人足球比賽中障礙物的特點，建立了足球機器人碰撞模型。針對目前機器人足球比賽中避障規劃演算法的不足，提出了基於障礙物的速度矢量信廣東工業大學工學博上學應論文息制定的足球機器人避障策略。 -
The structure of the design on the property ascertaining rules of civil judgment execution proceeding is as follows : the property declaration by obligors is the primary solution, the property ascertaining by obliges and people ’ s court is the secondary solution, the powerful legal sanction is the indemnificatory solution
我國目前民事執行財產查明制度設計思路以債務人財產申報為主軸，債權人自行查明與法院依職權調查為輔助，並以強有力的法律制裁措施為後盾。該架構將使民事執行實務有統一的考量標準，從而使當事人信服，最終實現司法公正與效率。 -
She refused to answer in contempt of the rules of court
她藐視法庭的規定，拒絕回答問題。 -
Rules of the high court amendment rules 1998
1998年高等法院規則修訂第2號規則 -
23. rules of the supreme court amendment rules 1997
23 . 1997年最高法院規則修訂規則 -
Rules of the high court amendment rules 1999
1999年高等法院規則修訂規則 -
Rules of the high court amendment rules 2002
2002年高等法院規則修訂規則 -
Rules of the high court amendment rules 2005
2005年高等法院規則修訂規則 -
Rules of the high court amendment rules 2003
2003年高等法院規則修訂規則 -
4. rules of the supreme court amendment no. 3 rules 1997
4 . 1997年最高法院規則修訂第3號 -
Rules of the high court amendment rules 2003 repeal rules
2003年高等法院規則修訂規則廢除規則 -
We will then implement the decision unless we have received from you during that ten business day period official documentation such as a copy of a complaint, file - stamped by the clerk of the court that you have commenced a lawsuit against the complainant in a jurisdiction to which the complainant has submitted under paragraph 3 of the rules of procedure
然後我方將執行該決議，除非在十（ 10 ）個工作日期間收到你方的正式文件（例如有法庭辦事員蓋章的申訴書的副本）表明你方已向管轄區域的司法部門提出對申訴方的訴訟，這依據的是訴訟條例的章節3 （ b ） （ xiii ） 。 -
From the author ’ s point of view, the root of aforesaid problems lies in the similarity of the rules of liquidation organized by a court with the rules of liquidation committed by a company on voluntary basis as a result from the court ’ s lack of necessary compulsory measures and system guarantee, and in the missing of the system of special liquidation of companies
作者認為上述問題的根源在於法院缺乏必要的強制措施和制度保障而造成的法院組織清算規則與公司自願清算規則的類同化，在於公司特別清算制度的缺失。應當對域外特別清算制度展開深入研究，在借鑒的基礎上加以符合國情的改造，盡快建立具有我國特色的實用的公司特別清算制度。 -
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the united states, than according to the rules of the common law
在習慣法的訴訟中，其爭執價額超過二十美元，由陪審團審判的權利應受到保護。由陪審團裁決的事實，合眾國的任何法院除非按照習慣法規則，不得重新審查。 -
In the part of discussing legal way, not only relative rules of substantive law are introduced, but also the difficulties we may meet in internet cases are analyzed, such as law selecting, subject affirmation, confirming of court jurisdiction and the acquirement of electronic evidence ; the seventh is to analyze the imperfections in current internet copyright protection, three aspects are mainly discussed ; the lack of legislation ( one is no definite rules about database protection in copyright law, the other is the lack of regulations to the applying of technology measure ), the low quality of judges and the poor ability to execute law, the light consciousness of people to internet copyrig ht. and the author puts forward his own improving opinions about it
在法律途徑中不僅介紹了有關的實體法律規定，還對法律適用、主體認定、法院管轄權的確定、電子證據的取得等網路訴訟中可能遇到的難題作了論述分析；七是分析了當前網路著作權保護中存在的問題，認為主要有立法上的不足（包括著作權法沒有對數據庫保護作出明文規定，以及對技術措施的採用缺乏規范兩方面） 、技術和設備上的欠缺而導致執法能力的低下、人們的網路著作權意識淡薄三個方面，並從中提出了自己的改進意見。 -
Pd30. 1 applications under part ii of the mental health ordinance ( cap. 136 ) pdsl1 directions made by the judge of the commercial list pursuant to o. 72 r. 2 ( 3 ) of the rules of the supreme court
Pdsl1商業案件審訊表專責法官根據《高等法院規則》第72號命令第2 （ 3 ）條規則作出的指示 -
The aim of this article is to develop some effective studying on this point through the analysis of internal value of the displaying system of criminal evidence, and describes the active functions of it both on justice and efficiency as well as protection of the defence right of accused party. furthermore, the article compared different displaying systems of criminal evidence of the usa, great britain, japan, and italy to discuss the development rules of this system combing with the chinese present mixing litigation mode of original authority lawsuit method and the oppositional court inquiring method by both parties, which comparing and analyzing the rules of evidence - displaying both of original and present modes to list the problems existed in the present criminal evidence - displaying system. finally, the article brings forward some conceives of configuration and perfecting of chinese criminal evidence - displaying system from the selection of mode, scope, and judge function of criminal evidence - displaying and penalty measures to the deregulation of displaying of evidence etc
首先從分析刑事證據展示制度的內在價值入手，充分闡述其在實現公正與效率兼顧和保護被告人辯護權方面的積極作用；其次通過對美國、英國、日本和義大利的刑事證據展示制度的比較，來探析該制度的發展規律；再次結合我國的刑事訴訟從原來的職權主義訴訟模式轉變為現在兼有當事人主義有關規定的混合式訴訟模式，對前後兩種模式中具有證據展示性質的規定進行比較分析，說明現在刑事證據展示方面存在的諸多問題；最後從刑事證據展示的模式選擇、刑事證據展示的范圍、法官在證據展示中的作用、以及違反證據展示規則的制裁措施等幾個主要方面，對構建和完善我國的刑事證據展示制度提出了設想。 -
To find out what rules to follow, look at : the code of civil procedure, state rules of court and local rules
具體應該遵循何種規則，參照： 《民事訴訟法》 「庭審規則和當地規則」部分。
分享友人