恣體 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 []
恣體 英文
porcelain
  • : Ⅰ動詞(放縱; 沒有拘束) do as one pleases; throw off restraint; indulge oneself Ⅱ形容詞[方言] (舒服) comfortable
  • : 體構詞成分。
  1. Re - examining the fields of college students management from the point of lawfulness, we find the problems existed unneglectable, whose main manifestation is that it is a common phenomenon to intrude on the students ’ lawful rights in college students management work, for example : actual inequality exists in the work of enrolling college students ; the school dismiss students freely, and intrude on the students ’ rights of being educated ; disrespect the students ’ privacy, and intrude on the students ’ personality rights ; impose fines and collect fees freely, and intrude on the students ’ property rights ; some problems exist in the standard and procedures of evaluating students, and intrude on the students ’ just evaluation rights ; manage and punish students subjectively and randomly without considering procedures, which makes the students ’ appealing rights and lawsuit rights could not be used effectively, and intrude on the students ’ procedural rights ; intrude on the other rights laid down by the students ’ laws and regulations

    以法治的眼光重新審視高校學生管理領域,其中存在的問題不容忽視。主要表現為在高校學生管理工作中侵犯學生合法權益現象較為普遍,具包括:高校學生錄取工作中存在著事實上的不平等,學校意開除學生,侵犯學生受教育權;不尊重學生隱私,侵犯學生人格權;亂罰款,亂收費,侵犯學生財產權;高校對學生評價的標準、程序方面存在著一些問題,侵犯學生公正評價權;管理處分學生主觀隨意,缺乏程序,學生申訴權、訴權不能有效行使,侵犯學生程序性權利;侵犯學生法律法規規定的其它權利。
  2. The precondition of studying the distribution of burden of proof in civil lawsuit is to correctly set theoretical definitions for burden of proof as well as the object of burden of proof. going through various viewpoints upon the distribution of burden of proof, they, guided by the substantive law and the principle of justice and fairness, have respective limitations, they strive for the predictability and stability of law, but unavoidably face the problem of little flexibility, which might make the results not so fair, the substantive standards highlight a great flexibility, but might cause careless judge due to the uncertainty of standards

    綜觀證明責任分配諸說,雖均以符合實法宗旨與公平正義原則為指導思想,但各有其局限,形式性標準致力於實現法的可預測性與穩定性,但卻不可避免地存在靈活性不足的問題,可能使證明責任負擔的結果有欠公平,實質性標準實現了靈活性的長處,卻又存在因標準不確定導致法官意裁判危及正義的可能。
  3. Without procedural law, substantive law would show the abuse of power

    離開了程序法,實法就會表現為權力的意。
分享友人