排放稅 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [bèifàngshuì]
排放稅 英文
emissions taxes
  • : 排構詞成分。
  • : releaseset freelet go
  • : 名詞1. (徵收的貨幣或實物) tax; duty; tallage; due 2. (姓氏) a surname
  • 排放 : discharge; blowoff; blowdown; issue; volley; emission; sluice; bleed
  1. Mr hodgson set the tax yesterday at nz $ 11 a metric tonne of carbon emitted

    在5月4日,何特森將率訂為每一公噸溫室氣體,收費11紐幣,兩年內就會正式生效。
  2. Market - oriented economists favor taxes on emissions, and some favor creating tradable rights, the usual solutions to the problems of a commons, in emissions

    市場導向型經濟學家主張對污染物征,也有人贊同發可交易污染許可證,即對公共權的通常解決辦法。
  3. Are taxes the best means to cut greenhouse emissions

    是削減溫室氣體的最好辦法嗎?
  4. Best of all, set a carbon tax, which is less susceptible to capture by business lobbies than is a cap - and - trade system

    最好的是設定一項碳排放稅,此相比「總量管制和交易體系」更不容易受商業游說的影響。
  5. Thus with such a tax, emissions will be curbed insofar as the nuisance they create exceeds their benefits

    這樣,只要採取了這樣一種收措施,者為了保證其收益,就會減少二氧化碳量,其所帶來的危害也會隨之減少。
  6. A strong advocate of tax policies and tougher laws aimed at the reduction of co2 emissions, lord oxburgh contributed substantially to bringing in the strategy and expertise in environmentally - friendly technologies as wave and tidal power

    勛爵一直致力推動以徵及立法管制減低二氧化碳量,且在策動多項環保科技如潮汐發電等長遠發展及持續政策及技術方面作出重大的貢獻。
  7. The government has introduced road tax exemption for electric car owners and reduced road tax for those who drive cars with low co2 emissions

    政府引入了一項措施,免除電動汽車車主的路,此外,對二氧化碳較少的汽車的車主,適當減少他們的路
  8. To go beyond what climate specialists call the “ business as usual ” scenario, the u. s. must follow europe and even some of its own state governments in instituting new policies that affix a price on carbon ? whether in the form of a tax on emissions or in a cap - and - trade system ( emission allowances that are capped in aggregate at a certain level and then traded in open markets )

    為了進一步走向氣候專家所說一切如常的理想狀況,美國必須跟隨歐洲甚至自家州政府的腳步,制訂新的政策,為碳標上售價,不管是對量課,或是採取限量管制與交易(在某種程度上管制總量,然後讓這些量在市場上公開交易) 。
  9. Taxing carbon would price the cost of emissions into the price of goods, and retailers would then have an incentive to source locally if it saved energy

    含碳燃料排放稅會將成本轉移至商品售價中,這樣就促使零售商從本地采購? ?如果這樣更節約能源。
  10. Real change will require action by governments, in the form of a global carbon tax ; reform of the world trade system ; and the abolition of agricultural tariffs and subsidies, notably europe ' s monstrous common agricultural policy, which coddles rich farmers and prices those in the poor world out of the european market

    能否發生真正的改變決定於各國政府能否行動起來,如開始徵收煙塵排放稅、改革世界貿易體制、取消農業關和補貼,特別是要廢除荒誕的歐洲「共同農業政策」 (遷就照顧富裕農戶,而對那些貧困農民卻漫天要價,以致其被迫離開市場) 。
  11. But policies ? which include energy taxes, financial incentives, professional training, labeling, environmental legislation, greenhouse gas emissions trading and international coordination of regulations for traded products ? can make an enormous difference

    不過,政策(包括能源、金融獎勵、專業訓練、價格標定、環境立法、溫室氣體交易,以及國際間對于貿易貨品在法規上的調整)所能帶來的改變卻很大。
  12. Taking as examples visa fees and collection and disposal charges for oily waste discharged by merchant ships, taxpayers are subsidising 77 per cent and 56 per cent respectively of the cost

    以入境簽證費和收集及處置商船的油類廢物費用為例,現時納人須分別津貼有關成本的百分之七十七和百分之五十六。
  13. Taking as examples visa fees and collection and disposal charges for oily waste discharged by merchant ships, taxpayers are subsidising 77 per cent and 56 per cent respectively of the cost. this is unfair to them

    以入境簽證費和收集及處置商船的油類廢物費用為例,現時納人須分別津貼有關成本的百分之七十七和百分之五十六。這對納人來說,並不公平。
  14. Sulphur dioxide pollution in america has been cut by a successful cap - and - trade system

    比如,美國採取管制的形式來控制汽車尾氣,而歐洲採用徵收燃料的方法。
  15. A third advantage of carbon taxes is that they raise revenue

    排放稅的第三個優點就是可以增加國家收。
  16. So we need a carbon tax or something like it to provide such incentives

    因此,我們需要一個二氧化碳排放稅或者類似的辦法來提供這樣一個激勵機制。
  17. Such reforms, in effect, make a cap - and - tradesystem work more like a carbon tax

    這其實就使得「限制與交易許可」機制最終滑入了碳排放稅的懷抱。
  18. In retrospect i think that the argument for the carbon tax has been pitched in the wrong way and at the wrong level

    如果進行一下回顧,我認為政府關於二氧化碳排放稅的觀點無論在思路上還是在考慮層面上都是錯誤的。
  19. He is right, too, that the taxation of emissions should, other things being equal, replace other taxes, rather than raise the overall level of taxation

    他的另外一個觀點也是對的:在其它條件不變的情況下,碳排放稅應當取代其它種,而不是提高整體負。
  20. Even without the volatility, some economists reckon that a cap - and - tradesystem produces fewer incentives than a carbon tax for climate - friendlyinnovation

    即使沒有價格波動的問題在裏面,很多經濟學家也認為「限制與交易許可」機制對于氣候改變的推動力根本就不如碳排放稅
分享友人