普通法訴訟 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [pǔtōngfǎsùsòng]
普通法訴訟
英文
common law action- 普 : Ⅰ形容詞(普遍; 全面) general; universal Ⅱ名詞(姓氏) a surname
- 通 : 通量詞(用於動作)
- 法 : Ⅰ名詞1 (由國家制定或認可的行為規則的總稱) law 2 (方法; 方式) way; method; mode; means 3 (標...
- 訴 : 動詞1. (說給人) tell; relate; inform 2. (傾吐) complain; accuse 3. (控告) appeal to; resort to
- 訟 : 動詞1. (打官司) bring a case to court 2. (爭辯是非) dispute; argue
- 普通 : common; general; ordinary; plain; honest; private; trile; average
- 訴訟 : [法律] lawsuit; litigation; legal action; judicial action; action
-
The restriction has its origins in the ancient common law crime and tort of champerty and maintenance
此限制源於古時普通法罪行及包攬訴訟與維持有關行為乃侵權行為。Champerty or giving of assistance, encouragement or support to litigation by a person who has no legitimate interest in the litigation is currently against public policy and is unlawful in common law
在訴訟中並無合法權益的人士包攬訴訟或提供援助鼓勵或支援訴訟,現時有違公共政策,而根據普通法亦屬違法。The current public prosecution mode in our country took shape from the past whole case - examine mode in the base of the thinking to get ride of the drawbacks in the past. in practice, it has not only become effective and cause out a lot of new defaults, for example, the definition of the main evidence is not clear, the transfer range of the case files is unclear and the stipulate of the examine consequence is not enough. in order to reform and perfect the current public prosecution mode, we should regard the theory of the public prosecution as guide, combine our country ' s conditions, on methodology jump out of the circle relatively drawing lessons from the past, on the procedural theory, change the idea that the forejudge caused from the substantive examination and clarify the objective fact the current public prosecution include the essential substantive examination, in practice regard legitimacy, rationality and flexibility as the principle of law enforcement before the law to revise, in legislation define the concept of the main evidence clearly, add the regulation to dispatch the examine judge and the trial judge, regulate the treatment methods after examination and revise some rules about the summary procedure
以公訴審查制度的訴訟理念為指導,結合我國的國情,對現行公訴審查模式的改革和完善,在方法論上跳出以往比較借鑒的圈子;在訴訟理念上改變過去庭審法官預斷必然緣于實體性審查的觀念,以澄清現行公訴審查模式包括必要的實體審的客觀事實;在實踐中以合法性、合理性和靈活性作為立法修改前的執法原則;在立法上明確界定主要證據的范圍是對證明犯罪是否成立起主要作用或有重要影響的證據,其中既包括有罪證據也包括無罪證據,增加規定公訴審查法官與正式庭審法官分立制度,補充規定對公訴審查后開庭審理之外的其它情況的處理方法以及對於人民法院在審理過程中發現不宜適用簡易程序的,取消原刑訴法應當按照一般公訴案件適用的普通審判程序重新審理的規定,改為由審理該案件的獨任審判員以外的審判員重新組成合議庭對該案件進行重新審理等。At last, the author explains the initial proposition to establish constitution litigation system which includes three parts. the first part discusses the construction of constitution litigation organization is an important aspect to establish constitution litigation system, which should abide by some principles. lt is not fit for state of our country that constitution court, general court and constitution committee alone hold the post of constitution litigation organization in our country. compound constitution litigation organization should be put up, that is to say that constitution supervision committee should be established under the whole state people representative conference and its general committee
最後,論述了建立憲法訴訟制度的初步構想。第一,憲法訴訟機關的設置是重要一環,機關設置必須遵循一定的原則,在我國由憲法法院、單獨由普通法院或憲法委員會擔任憲法訴訟機關不符合我國國情和實際情況,在我國應建立復合式的憲法訴訟機構,即在全國人大及其常委會下設憲法監督委員會,在最高院和高院設立憲法法庭共同行使憲法訴訟權。In the second part of the article, the author introduces the comparison of system of constitution litigation in our country with system in foreign countries. at present, there are four kinds of system of constitution litigation in the world including the kind of general court, the kind of constitutional court, the kind of joint investigation of constitutional committee and administrative court, the kind of joint investigation of parliament and general court
論文的第二部分介紹了中外各國憲法訴訟制度。世界上存在著四種類型的憲法訴訟制度,即普通法院型、憲法法院型、憲法法院與行政法院并行審查型、議會與普通法院并行審查型,並介紹了四種類型憲法訴訟制度的優勢與不足。Labor lawsuit is in - dependent in arbitration, sets up labor trial court in ordinary counts, establishes the labor lawsuit special procedure in formulating labor dispute processing law in china
其基本制度內涵是「或裁或審」 ,勞動訴訟獨立於仲裁;在普通法院內部設立勞動審判庭;在我國正在制定的《勞動爭議處理法》中確立勞動訴訟特別程序。Personnel litigation procedure is a special procedure applicable to human body relation litigation established in the code of civil procedures of the civial law systems ’ countries exclusively relating to the common litigation procedure to resolve the property relation case
人事訴訟程序是大陸法系國家民事訴訟法中確立的專門適用於解決身份關系訴訟的特別程序,它與解決財產關系案件的普通訴訟程序相對應。Standard legal aid is available for representation in civil proceedings in the court of final appeal, court of appeal, court of first instance, district court, lands tribunal for tenancy matters under part ii of the landlord and tenant ( consolidation ) ordinance and applications to the mental health review tribunal
在終審法院、上訴法庭、原訟法庭及區域法院審理的民事案件,土地審裁處根據《業主與租客(綜合)條例》第ii部審理的案件,以及向精神健康復查審裁處提出的申請,均可接受普通法律援助,獲提供法律代表。The countries and regions of the civil law system adopt the system of public summons for exhortation, while the countries of common law system adopt the system of taking proceedings
大陸法系國家規定公示催告制度,英美法系國家規定為普通訴訟制度,有的還兼有掛失止付制度。And some other countries adopt the system of reporting the losing of bills and stopping the payment besides the two main systems. our country assimilates the practice of the countries in the two main law systems
我國票據法律制度中吸收兩大法系的制度,掛失止付、公示催告和普通訴訟兼有,構成了我國票據喪失救濟制度。The principle of presumption of innocence, a general rule in many countries ' legislation and international conventions, determines the suspect or the defendant ' s procedural position and rights in criminal suit
摘要無罪推定原則是各國立法通例和國際公約普遍規定,主要確定刑事訴訟中犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的訴訟地位及訴訟權利。Hong kong has a well - developed legal aid system in operation for over 35 years providing access to justice to the lower middle class and below who cannot afford litigation because of limited means. this is commonly known as the ordinary legal aid scheme olas
香港設有發展完備的法律援助體制,迄今已運作逾35年,為因能力有限而不能負擔訴訟開支的中下階層人士提供司法服務,一般稱為普通法律援助計劃普通法援計劃。Judicatory actualization of constitution includes two aspects : first, judicature censor to law, statute and decision, order of sanction at larger which infracting the constitution ; second, on the condition of lacking common law and of people " s basic right be infracted, applying constitution criterion to judge
憲法司法化具體包括兩方面內涵:一是對法律、法規以及具有普遍約束力的決定和命令進行違憲的司法審查;二是在公民基本權利受到侵害而普通法律缺位的情況下提起憲法訴訟,並在具體案件中適用憲法規范作判決。Tax evaders may also face prosecution of cheating public revenue under common law and is punishable by the criminal procedure ordinance, which carries a maximum penalty of seven years imprisonment plus a fine of no limit
逃稅人士亦可能根據普通法被控以行騙公共收入的罪名根據刑事訴訟程序條例,該罪名的最高刑罰為入獄七年和沒定限的罰款。As private international law and civil procedure of the common - law system originated from england, its related systems are very perfect
英國是普通法系國際私法和民事訴訟制度的源頭,其相關制度非常發達。On the other hand, in order to ensure that the us trans - national corporations would implement their personal data protection policy, the " principles " also stress the importance of remedies. as such, the " principles " provide that in most cases, the persons affected could initiate legal proceedings either in the states or europe. besides, the " principles " also list in detail the remedies that can be pursued under the laws of the states, including infringement of privacy rights under a common law tart claim etc
另一方面,為了確保美國的跨國企業會執行保障個人資料的政策,原則也強調制裁的重要性,因此,原則規定受影響的人士在大部分情況下,均可以在歐盟或美國提出訴訟,原則也詳細列出了一系列根據美國法律可以追究的制裁方式,包括普通法中的侵犯私隱權等。Assistant principal legal aid counselcivil litigation, miss betty chan and senior legal aid counsel, mr francis chan explained the legal aid system in hong kong to a group of 13 mainland lawyers under the training scheme in common law on june 8
助理首席法律援助律師民事訴訟陳?華及高級法律援助律師陳運傑於六月八日向十三名參與內地法律工作人員普通法訓練計劃的內地律師解釋香港的法律援助制度。Tax evaders may also face prosecution of cheating public revenue under common law and is punishable by the criminal procedure ordinance, which carries a maximum penalty of seven years imprisonment plus a fine of no limit. endwednesday, may 28, 2003
逃稅人士亦可能根據《普通法》被控以行騙公共收入的罪名;根據《刑事訴訟程序條例》 ,該罪名的最高刑罰為入獄七年和沒定限的罰款。This matter hksar v david ma and others was resolved by the court of appeal, which upheld the legality of the plc and affirmed the continuous application of the common law in the hksar
高等法院上訴法庭已審結這宗案件香港特別行政區與馬維?及其他人士對訟,結果維持原判,裁定臨立會為合法機構,並確認普通法繼續適用於香港特區。This matter ( hksar v david ma and others ) was resolved by the court of appeal, which upheld the legality of the plc and affirmed the continuous application of the common law in the hksar
? ?高等法院上訴法庭已審結這宗案件(香港特別行政區與馬維?及其他人士對訟) ,結果維持原判,裁定臨立會為合法機構,並確認普通法繼續適用於香港特區。分享友人