榷 的英文怎麼說

Cryptic species have been found in a wide range of marine organisms ; with majority of them are benthic invertebrates. in contrast, marine holoplanktons are thought to have lower diversity and slow speciation due to their strong dispersal potential. this paper reviewed studies on cryptic species and speciation in marine holoplankton. based on findings in 38 studied taxa, it was concluded that : 1 ) cryptic species are pervasive in marine holoplankton, suggesting holoplankton speciation was more active than previously thought ; 2 ) current morphospecies diversity is untenable to reflect true species diversity in marine holoplankton ; 3 ) geographic isolation may facilitate cryptic speciation of marine holoplankton. however, contribution of allopatric speciation is still questionable ; 4 ) ecological speciation may be the prevailing speciation mode in marine holoplankton. cryptic speciation in marine holoplankton is paradoxical, because rapid speciation under strong gene flow is countertuitive. solution of this paradox will help us gain deep insights of marine speciation and biodivesity

隱種廣泛存在於各類海洋生物中，尤其是底棲無脊椎動物.然而，海洋終生浮游生物由於具有較強的擴散能力，往往被視為生物多樣性低、物種形成慢.本文就海洋終生浮游生物隱種與物種形成的研究作一綜述.基於研究的38個種類，結果表明: 1 ）海洋終生浮游生物普遍存在隱種，其物種形成要比想象得快; 2 ）由於引種的廣泛存在，形態種生物多樣性無法反映海洋終生浮游生物真正的物種多樣性; 3 ）地理隔離有助於海洋終生浮游生物隱種的形成，但異域物種形成的作用仍值得商榷; 4 ）生態物種形成很可能是海洋終生浮游生物物種形成的主流模式.海洋終生浮游生物強基因流下快速的物種形成有悖于生物進化常理，解決該悖論將有助於我們對海洋物種形成和生物多樣性的理解

Can a tourist be an appellee in tourism complaint ? - on appellee ' s qualification and discussion with mr. han yuling

論被投訴者資格兼與韓玉靈先生商榷

Discussions on the experimental technique on biotype of the brown planthopper nilapavata lugens

褐飛虱生物型研究中幾個問題的商榷

This article is main the range, treaty about of the concordat responsibility negligence responsibility, see to default the responsibility with the returning of concordat the principle make some to study, quanta these subjects all have some arguments, text with a view to pass the search in the academic world and everybody among them of concerning subject company ' s

這篇文章主要就合同責任的范圍，締約過失責任，預期違約責任和合同的歸責原則作一些探討，因為這些問題在學術界都有一些爭論，本文擬通過研究與大家就其中的有關問題商榷一番。首先是合同責任的范圍，很多學者認為是僅僅指違約責任。

It should be noted that the consultative style can allow contraction.

應該注意，在商榷語氣中可以有縮略表達。

Demonization, deification and humanization - a discussion on hong xiuquan ' s true historical features with prof. pan xulan

就洪秀全的歷史真面目與潘旭瀾教授商榷

Who has denied peasant revolts ? - a discussion with fang zhiguang and mao xiaoling ' s depute with pan xulan

毛曉玲與潘旭瀾商榷的商榷

Exculpating for marx : discussing with wang jianmin on

問題與王建民教授商榷

Discussion on newly - edited internal medicine of traditional chinese medicine

中若干問題的商榷

Several questions about translation of the phonetic terms in the chart of ipa

國際海事公約幾處翻譯的商榷

Discussion on an example in junior high school textbook

關於一道初中課本例題的商榷

Below this major premise, a lot of people arrange ward in house place most inside more devious perhaps room, this is worth deliberate really

在這個大前提下，有很多人把病房安排在居所的最裡面或者較偏僻的房間，這實在值得商榷。

On manchu style chinese : to discuss with mr. zhao jie

一書觀點與張敦福先生商榷

Discussion about some problems of dinghai battles in opium war

鴉片戰爭定海之戰幾個問題的商榷

Study on the typing of cerebral palsy in children

小兒腦性癱瘓分型的商榷

An issue in the scheme of the chinese language phonetic alphabet

中一個需要商榷的問題

For a man who claimed an “ ecstatic prescience of the glories beyond the grave ”, it was a fitting existence

對於一個自稱「醉心於預測生后榮耀」的人而言，他的死不愧為最好的注腳（這句的翻譯有待商榷） 。

Terminology of the modes of preservation of vascular plant megafossils : a discussion

關于維管植物大化石保存方式術語的商榷

Part iv : after discussing with some of the two jural relation, the paper puts forward that the mode of the intervenor of right to join the action in chief is to apply by himself, and the mode of the intervenor of duty is to be notified by the court

第四部分：在對部分觀點進行商榷之後，提出權利參加型第三人的參訴方式為自己申請參加；義務參加型第三人的參訴方式為法院依一方主當事人之申請，通知第三人參加。

Then, the paper puts forward a few points to discuss with the suggestion of quasi - party, and produces that : so called quasi - party, it ' s essence is that the intervening of party posses two status in litigation - intervening in action in chief and one party in intervening action

接著，對準獨立請求權第三人的提法進行了商榷，認為準獨立請求權第三人其實是第三人同時兼具了兩種訴訟身份? ?本訴的無獨立請求權第三人和參加之訴的一方主當事人。