比約內馬克 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [bǐyāonèimǎkè]
比約內馬克 英文
bjornemark
  • 比 : Ⅰ動詞1 （比較; 較量高下、 長短、距離、好壞等） compare; compete; contrast; match; emulate 2 （比...
  • 約 : 約動詞[口語] （用秤稱） weigh
  • 內 : 名詞1. （內部; 里頭; 里邊） inner; inside; within 2. （妻子或妻子的親屬） one's wife or her relatives 3. （姓氏） a surname
  • 馬 : Ⅰ名詞1 [動物學] （哺乳動物） horse 2 （象棋棋子） horse one of the pieces in chinese chess3 （姓...
  • 克 : 克i 動詞1 （能） can; be able to 2 （克服; 克制） restrain; control 3 （攻下據點; 戰勝） overcome...
  • 馬克 : 1. （德國貨幣） mark2. （芬蘭貨幣） markka馬克白蘭地 marc
  1. The western scholars ? las and johnson has shown that the hard core of the research programs based on the science research programs methodology is difficult to change and it can be maintained and developed by adjusting the assisting hypothetic protecting zone. they give comparatively objective statement of the hard cores of western mainstream economics research programs and the marx ' s economics research programs, which is based on the comparative analysis on the human being, rationality, property right, market and the view on the social history of the two hard cores

    西方學者格拉斯和約翰遜根據拉卡托斯的科學研究綱領方法論所表明的研究綱領的硬核不易改變，可以通過調整輔助性假設保護帶的方法來加以維護和發展的學說，對西方主流派的經濟學研究綱領的硬核和馬克思經濟學研究綱領的硬核的內容作了比較客觀的陳述，他們的陳述是以對兩大綱領硬核關於人、理性、產權、市場和社會史觀的對比分析來進行的。
  2. It begins at marxism and bourgeois outlook. lt contrasts the government economic function outlook in marxism and " contract country " outlook and " welfare country " outlook. it analyses on the phenomenon of " market non - effective " and " government non - effective " and discusses the contents of government function under socialism market economy and its relation with market

    首先從馬克思主義和西方資產階級國家觀入手，對馬克思主義的政府經濟職能觀和西方「契約國家」觀、 「福利國家」觀進行比較，並通過對「市場失靈」 、 「政府失靈」現象的分析，論述了市場經濟條件下政府職能的內容及其與市場的關系。
  3. Chapter two, sometimes is the common topic to civil law scholars, but the studying products fall short of depth and width, so this chapter is governed by the historic overview and comparative method, under the base of examining the development and vicissitude of roman trust notion, probing into why the civil law did n ' t develop and shape the institution of trusts like anglo - saxon jurisdictions, meantime collecting and analyzing the various experiences and lessons from a number of civil law countries, not only including mixed - system jurisdictions ( scotland, quebec ) influenced by common law tradition far - reachingly, but also including the various effects of the trust law codified by pure civil law countries ( liechtenstein, japan, latin american countries ), and the developments of domestic trust in holland and italy under the rectification of the trust hague convention, ad hoc, including the experiences and lessons of non - recognition trust countries ( germany, france, switzerland ) that they had been penetrating into the notions in civil codes, all is intended to " portrayed " the competitive panorama between civil

    第二章「信託觀念與民法傳統的沖突和融合」 ：這一主題一直是民法學者探討的核心問題，本部分採取了歷史考察的方法和比較分析的方法，在考察羅馬法中的信託觀念的發展和變遷的基礎上，探討了為什麼民法傳統沒有發展出如普通法系一樣的信託的若干原因，同時一廣泛地涉獵了民法法系各國繼受和發展信託觀念的不同的經驗和教訓，不僅包括深受普通法系影響的混合法系（蘇格蘭和魁北克）在民法傳統的物權法匡架中發展信託的獨特經驗，而且考察了純粹民法傳統的國家（列支敦斯登、日本和拉丁美洲國家以法典繼受信託的不同的效果，以及在1984年《關于信託的法律適用和承認的公約卜v發展國內信託例證?一荷蘭和義大利，更包括了對于沒有接受普通法系信託而在民法典中挖掘信託觀念的德國、法國和瑞十的經驗和問題，並意圖勾畫民法傳統中的信託與普通法系的信託相競爭的全景，介刑」析眾多經驗和教訓i的基礎上為我國《信託法》的發展提供借鑒。
  4. At the same time, a decision is made that america paradigm and soviet union paradigm should n ' t be looked upon as the guideline of china ' s economic paradigm and that in idea paradigm marxian economics has common ground with institutional economics and a set of socialism economics theory in rule paradigm and practice paradigm should be formed on the basis of idea paradigm afforded by marxian economics and by inheriting and reconstructing marxian economics in accordance with institutional economics, because we know that marxian economics is more abundant in connotation than institutional economics and the logic space afforded by its idea paradigm is great although it is impossible to specifically guide china ' s economy hi transitional period for the limitation of its historical background

    而分析馬克思主義政治經濟學的觀念範式不難發現其與制度經濟學的通約性，二者在研究框架和內容（外涵與外延）的比較進一步說明這一點，然而馬克思主義政治經濟學所包含內涵卻比制度經濟學豐富許多，由於馬克思主義政治經濟學受所產生的時代的限制，不可能對社會主義轉型時期經濟理論予以具體指導，而其觀念範式所提供的邏輯空間卻是巨大的。所以，筆者認為，在重建中國經濟學範式的過程中，除了應當以馬克思經濟學的觀念範式為基礎外，還應結合西方經濟學範式理論，即以「馬學為體，西學為用」 ，做到對馬克思經濟學的傳承創新，對西方經濟學範式的超越，在規則範式和操作範式上完成社會主義經濟理論的建構。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書