混種斗爭 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [húnzhǒngdǒuzhēng]
混種斗爭 英文
mixed-species competition
  • : 混形容詞1. (渾濁) muddy; turbid2. (糊塗; 不明事理) foolish; stupid
  • : 種名詞(姓氏) a surname
  • : 斗Ⅰ名詞1 (量糧食的器具) dou a measure for grain2 (形狀像斗的東西) an object shaped like a cup...
  • : Ⅰ動詞1 (力求得到或達到; 爭奪) contend; vie; compete; struggle for; strive 2 (爭執; 爭論) argu...
  • 混種 : hybrid
  1. To realize this great selfish ambition, cultural and educational elite drastically criticized xikun scholars who held important political and educational positions but advocated poetic pursuit to escape from political dangers, and posed many models of educational discursive practice to control, better, and cultivate the full - of - desire societal life being neglected and thrown out of the academic sight by xikun school : firstly, in the early period, fan zhongyan and his followers, sun fu, and shi jie, et al., believed that confucian principles could be used to reform political, and educational institutions and improve society ; secondly, after fan, wanganshi, being treated as cultural rebel by other traditional moralists and politic competitors, did a failure of national wide educational and political reforms to cultivate financial talents, based on his coarse economics knowledge about how to enrich the central government ; thirdly, ou yangxiu and su shi focused attention on reform the highly rigidified literature and art education system at that time according to their cultural ideal that everybody has the right to express what his daily life, emotions and dreams, which could be seen as an irony by the fact that only themselves " life and feeling could enter into their literature and art education kingdom, while those who described lowly people " s experience, such as liu yong " s sentimental assays written specially for female performers and even the prostitutes, had to suffer from exclusion

    但是,在十一世紀的文教空間中,真正值得考古學注意的知識是由理學家發明的,這不光因為,正是理學(而不是范學、王學、蘇學等這些在當時權力更大的知識)日後成了支配中國文教社會生活的權力,更是由於在十一世紀的文教界,只有理學家從一最抽象的視角,認為十一世紀喧囂亂的世俗生活及其基本的教化問題,無論多麼復雜,都可以歸結為人身上的理性與慾望之間的。就「哲學」能力而言,在渴望成聖、平天下的文教精英當中,理學家無疑是最出色的,他們能夠想到從「人」的結構出發,來認識世間紛繁復雜的現象,因而只需靜坐一處沉思人本身的秘密,而不必象王安石等人那樣認為到各地去調查,才可以摸清世間的狀況與問題。尤其不可思儀的是,他們的知識竟來源於看上去對教化世俗並不感興趣、只想追求長生不老的道士。
  2. From her happily ending plays for children to her increasingly dark plays for adults she exposes the chaos that results from the chasm between promises of prosperity for everyone and actual conditions that pit individuals against each other

    從以孩童為取向寫出的快樂結局到為成人所寫愈趨黑暗的劇本,她欲揭露某落差導致的亂,而這落差是來自於政府對人人享有繁榮的允諾到實際上人人相互的情況。
分享友人