澄治 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [dèngzhì]
澄治
英文
sumiji-
I am the seven vedic fire rituals, i am the five daily acts of sacrifice, i am the oblations offered to the departed ancestors, i am the healing herb ; i am the transcendental incantation ; i am clarified cow ghee ; i am the fire and i am the act of offering
「我」就是那七種《呋陀》的拜火儀式， 「我」就是那每天必行的五項祭祀， 「我」就是供奉給祖先的祭品， 「我」就是治病的草藥， 「我」就是超然的咒語， 「我」就是澄清了的牛油， 「我」就是祭火， 「我」就是祭奉的行為。In order to punish the act of infringing on trade secret comprehensively and powerfully, regulate the market order to compete fairly, protect the obligee ' s trade secret. crime of infringing on trade secret was firstly added in the criminal law amended in 1997, which evokes many problems and disputes during its applying. with the joint efforts of academic and judicial circles, some problems have reached agreements, but more ones are still unresolved
刑法不是萬能的，但刑法之外的其他手段也不是萬能的，在其他手段不足以保護社會關系的情況下，就需要刑法的介入，為了更全面、更有力地懲治侵犯商業秘密的行為、規范公平競爭的市場秩序、保護權利人的商業秘密， 1997年修訂刑法專門增設了侵犯商業秘密罪，該罪在適用過程中遇到了諸多問題和爭議，理論界和司法實務界為此進行了大量的探討，澄清了一些問題，但也還有很多爭議沒有得到解決。The introduction reveals if s value to the research of the development of zen, and of the development of thought of zen in china. the second chapter tries to solve the problems of the decision of the names of some manual scripts in dunhuang zen documents and some other problems. it clears the misunderstanding in a few important questions. the next chapter, stepping in from a researching and data - sorting - out view, discusses in details the writing symbols and their explanations in the zen documents and the mistakes often seen in proof - reading, etymological and semantic explanations of words and phrases
第一章概要論述了敦煌禪宗文獻的內容、時代及研究的歷史與現狀，揭示了敦煌禪宗文獻在中國禪宗發展史、禪思想史研究方面的重要價值；第二章對敦煌禪宗文獻部分寫卷的定名及諸多問題進行了考論，澄清了已往對一些重大問題的錯誤認識；第三章從文獻整理與研究的角度切入，對敦煌禪宗文獻的書寫符號與釋讀、寫本的常見錯誤、校勘以及詞語考釋等作了詳細論述，揭示出釋讀校理敦煌文獻與研治敦煌學的普遍規律；第四章就敦煌禪宗文獻的語料價值，包括對大型語文辭書的局限性、失收詞語、釋義、溯源等問題的探討，為辭書編纂修訂和構建科學完備的漢語史提供了第一手資料。Firstly, the paper retrospects the development of eso and tries to probe into the theoretical field : the explanation of it ' s definition, the conclusion of it ' s characters, the comparison of eso and other stock inspiration system, followed by the analysis of it ' s theoretical basis and incentive effect ; meanwhile, the paper probes into the realistic situations of eso in usa and china in order to seek the regulation and draw the advantages and disadvantages ; to this part, the paper takes the following four items as the main barriers to eso ' s implementation in china : the over restriction of current law system, the low efficiency of the market, the poor corporate governance structure and a lack of a reasonable performance index system, and elaborately analyze the impacts of the obstacles on eso ; after the analysis made above, the paper gets down to taking some methods to solve the problems in accordance with the characteristic of the barriers. as far as the internal defects of the mechanism are concerned, the paper begins with the scientifically design of the key components, studying the aspects of bestowal, change, loss, the executive method and the executive time. then the paper focuses on designing a performance index system which is an essential part of eso, introducing the bsc to improve the present performance index system, under the reasonable guidelines resigning it at both the levels of company ' s and employee ' s levels. finally, as regards how to perfect the outside surrounding of eso, the thesis makes some suggestion
本文首先回顧了股票期權制在國內外的發展及較為詳盡的分析了股票期權制度的相關理論：闡述了其涵義，特徵，理論基礎，激勵效應並於其他幾個較易混淆的股權激勵機製作逐一的比較，以進一步澄清人們對其的錯誤認識；同時，對股票期權制在美國和我國的現狀進行深入的實證研究，探求其內在規律，在肯定其成果時指出其不足；至此，筆者認為，我國上市公司要推行股票期權制度將主要面臨以下四類障礙：公司治理結構不完善、市場有效性差、現行法規體系不完善及缺乏客觀的業績考評指標體系，並詳細分析了各類障礙的現狀及對股票期權制的負面影響；在此基礎上，針對各類障礙的不同性質，著手探討消除這些障礙的措施：對于股票期權制內部的缺陷，本文先對各個關鍵要素進行科學設計，系統的剖析了贈與、變更、喪失、執行方式、股票來源等技術性問題，再以大量篇幅研究了如何構建出一套與實施股票期權制相配套的業績考核指標體系，引進平衡計分卡的思想對國內現有的指標體系加以改進，以一組合理的評價原則為指導，從公司及員工個人業績考評兩個層面上來設計該指標體系。By examining them in real political contexts, it aims to clarify their essential elements and evaluate their respective strengths and limitations
通過在真實的政治語境中對它們加以考察，本論文旨在澄清它們的要點，並評價它們各自的長處及局限。Conclusion : since there is a better way to promote school based management and the new law would damage a well established system, proved to be efficient the new law would bypass the sponsoring bodies, calls for direct intervention of the government, creating the danger of politicizing school management, we think that the government owe us an explanation why they are so adamant in imposing an uniform model and not allow us to go back to no. 7 report and choose the two - tier structure
大概立法會小組主席能幫助澄清這一點。結論：既然有比新法例更好的方法實踐校本管理，而新的法例破壞一個行之有效的制度架空辦學團體，讓政府直接管制在學校運作里帶入政治化的禍種我們以為政府應該解釋為何堅持新法例而不能同時讓我們選擇兩層的架構，回到七號報告書建議的多元化。分享友人