物權行為 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [quánhángwéi]
物權行為 英文
juristal act of real right
  • : 名詞1 (東西) thing; matter; object 2 (指自己以外的人或與己相對的環境) other people; the outsi...
  • : Ⅰ名詞1 [書面語] (秤錘) counterpoise; weight (of a steelyard)2 (權力) power; authority 3 (...
  • : 行Ⅰ名詞1 (行列) line; row 2 (排行) seniority among brothers and sisters:你行幾? 我行三。where...
  • 物權 : iura in re
  • 行為 : action; behaviour; conduct; deed
  1. Theoretical analysis on construction of juristic act of right in rem

    物權行為構成的理論探討
  2. Re - discussion about the juristic act of right in rem

    再談物權行為
  3. Furthermore, it analyzed the conflict in terms of the change of movable real right in the two systems and the effect of explanation and deploitation in terms of inscape of improper benefiting, scope of application and the effect of correcting the benefit imbalance which is caused by improper benefiting towards the system of non - reason of real right, and opened out the intrinsic relations between he system of non - reason of real right and the system of improper benefiting. the fourth part of the paper mainly analyzed our legislation pattern of real right alteration and the attitude towards non - reason of real right action in the field of civil law, and set forth the aim and existing obstacles in transplanting real right action and non - reason theory, and then pointed out, from the judge of theory, there are some factors of real right action in our exiting civil legislation and the biggest obstacle for transplanting the theory lies in the matter of cognition

    關於物權行為無因性制度與不當得利制度的比較,主要分析了物權行為無因性在給付不當得利的構成要件、適用范圍等方面的解釋和開拓作用,以及不當得利制度對於物權行為無因性制度所引起的利益失衡的平衡作用,指出物權行為無因性與不當得利之間存在著某種內在聯系,在不承認物權行為無因性原則的立法例中,不當得利請求處于輔助地位,在適用中多受限制;在以物權行為無因性原則特徵的立法例中,不當得利制度在理論上具有圓通性,在實務上功能突出,成救濟物權行為無因性所導致的利益失衡狀態的有效措施。
  4. Abstract principle of juristic act of real right

    物權行為無因性原則新論
  5. Juristic theory of real right act and real right alternation

    物權行為變動的理論思考
  6. The second part estimated this system from two angles, i. e. the function of the security protection of general dealing and the function of perspicuity of code structure system, meanwhile, reviewed the methodology of high abstract and technology of the system. the third part compared the non - reason of real right action theory with goodwill obtaining and the system of improper benefiting in civil law. it compared leitmotif, scope of application and functional mechanism between the non - reason of real right action theory and the system of improper benefiting

    指出物權行為無因性與善意取得制度是兩種獨立的制度,並從兩者的主旨、適用范圍、與作用機理方面進比較,指出兩種理論保護交易安全的主旨相同,物權行為無因性理論在適用范圍上較善意取得制度更廣泛些,善意取得制度的適用范圍較因性理論則更具有彈性。
  7. The real right behaviour and the real right ragulation

    物權行為理論與
  8. From the perspective of transferring of ownership, the legal nature of reservation of ownership is the transferring of property with suspenseful condition, which is juristic act of real right ; from the perspective of security for debts, it is contractual real rights for security

    所有保留制度的法律性質,從所有移轉角度分析,附停止條件的所有移轉,而附停止條件的所有移轉物權行為;從債的擔保角度分析,擔保一種約定的擔保
  9. As for the dissenting opinions on this doctrine, it is suggested in the paper that different legislation models in the property law system should be adopted in different parts of the property law that china is planning to enact. for example, legislation models in germany should be adopted in chapter general principles of the property law

    關于立法中如何對待倍受爭議的物權行為無因性理論,筆者指出,由於無因性理論在實踐中造成一定的困難,可採取措施予以彌補,通過使物權行為不是絕對的、不可歸于無效或失效的,對無因性理論缺乏公平性予以彌補。
  10. The article advises that the legislation of ex - right disposal of our country shall be based on theory of act of real right, and put forward the legislative design of ex - right disposal of our country on the basis

    本文建議我國無處分立法應以物權行為理論基礎,並且在此基礎上提出了我國無處分的立法設計。
  11. The article uses the theory of act of real right to analyze the legal structure of ex - right disposal, and how to deal with ex - right disposal with the theory of act of real right

    本文運用物權行為理論分析了無處分的法律結構,以該理論的區分原則、形式主義原則和抽象性原則對解決無處分的作用著眼點闡述了如何採用物權行為理論解決無處分
  12. With regard to the theory of alteration of real right, the author firstly traces back to some theory on the alteration of real right in roman law and germanic law, and then tells us three theoretical patterns of alteration of real right based on the juristic acts chosen by the continental law family, finally gives us two types of construction patterns of the alteration of real right. part ii relates to the public summons of personal property right

    對於變動理論,筆者首先追溯羅馬法和日耳曼法上有關變動的一些理論;接著介紹了現代大陸法系各國各自所採用的基於法律變動的理論模式,主要有三種模式:債意思主義、形式主義、債形式主義;最後擺出了變動理論構建的兩種方式:以物權行為核心的變動理論、以公示公信核心的變動理論。
  13. Finally, the author analyzes a few arguments of the theory of juristic act of real right most favored and points out the faults of them and holds that mancipatio and cessio injure in roman law or gewere in germanic law can be regarded as the embryo at most of the theory of juristic act of real right because there exists a great or even substantive distance between the above forms and the juristic act of real right as a product of modem law, the juristic act of real right acquires no complete form in ancient law systems

    最後,基於前述的探討,筆者分析了目前學界流的關於物權行為起源的幾個論斷,明確指出了其疏漏所在,認羅馬法上曼兮帕蓄、擬訴棄和日耳曼法上移轉的方式最多只能稱物權行為的肇端或雛形,離我們現在理解的「物權行為」尚有較大的甚或實質性的距離,物權行為是近代法的產,在古代法律制度中沒有完整的形態。
  14. Theory of juristic act of real right and construction of the civil law system

    物權行為理論與民法制度構造
  15. An analysis of the historical origins of the theory of juristic act of real right

    物權行為理論的歷史淵源分析
  16. The scholars claim that civil legislation of our country should adopt real right action theory and its system

    論者主張中國的民事立法應當采納物權行為理論及其制度。
  17. For the reasons above, this paper hackles the basic theoretical issues of juristic act of real right and makes a deep research in my own perspective and as a result, puts forward my own views and understandings expecting to contribute to the whole study of the theory of juristic act of real right by probing into the origination of the theory of juristic act of real right, this paper makes it cleat its origins and developments, studies the concept of juristic act of real right, introduces the cardinal contents of the theory of juristic act of real right, analyzes the omissions and faults in the field of the theory of juristic act of real right in our study of the science of law, and by doing so, constitute a basis for further study and legislation

    基於此,本文不揣淺陋,對物權行為基本理論問題作了梳理,以自己的視角作了較深入的探究,提出了較多自己的看法和理解,以期能整個物權行為理論的研究力盡綿薄。本文從物權行為理論的源流考察出發,釐清了物權行為理論的淵源和發展變化,探究了物權行為概念,介紹了物權行為理論的基本內容,剖析了物權行為理論在我國法學研究中的疏漏和謬誤,進一步對物權行為理論的捍衛及其制度的構建打下了基礎。
  18. The third part through the discussion that the law making background of the no - rights - to - discipline set by the law of contract, putting up the idea that we should choose the theory of victims of property rights to ideal law making mode, the fourth pan tells thai we irnportan : pans for ccnstructing the no - righs - to - discipline, men tells that difference that choose some lawful ways for analying the relationship for the different victims. especially for differences in protecting the both sides of business. better for assuring the safety of trade

    第五部分論述了在非物權行為模式下及物權行為模式下無處分法律關系主體的角色定位並採取比較法的方法探析了在兩種不同模式下各方當事人的不同關系,尤其對交易相對人保護上的差別,從而得出在無處分人與第三人關系中採取物權行為模式,較非物權行為模式有利於維護交易安全。
  19. Secondly, the author makes a brief introduction of the divergences for the understanding of the concept of the juristic act of real right, probes into the inner construction of the concept of the juristic act of real right, puts forward that we should combine the declaration of will and the forms and consider the legal effect to define the concept of the juristic act of real right and delineates the reasonability of this definition on the above basis, the author examines the relations between the concept of the juristic act of real right and the choice of different legislative models of patterns of real - right changing process and favors the german legislative pattern as the example to follow in our legislation

    其次簡介了學界對物權行為概念的分歧,並深入剖析了物權行為概念的構成,提出了以意思表示與形式相結合,並吸納物權行為外在的法律效果來界定物權行為的概念,繼而闡釋了如此定義物權行為的合理性。並在此基礎上,探討了變動立法模式的選擇與物權行為概念的關系,提出了我國宜采德國式的變動立法模式的主張。最後歸納介紹了物權行為理論在現代法上的基本內容,即主要包括分離原則、抽象原則和形式主義原則,並探討了物權行為理論的適用范圍,提出了無因性原則的適用條件。
  20. Juristic act of real right and the legislative chance of china ' s real right

    物權行為與我國法立法之選擇
分享友人