綜合裁判 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [zōnggěcáipàn]
綜合裁判 英文
comprehensive sanction
  • 綜 : 綜名詞[紡織] （織布機上使 經線交錯著上下分開以便梭子通過的裝置; 綜片） heddle; heald
  • 合 : 合量詞（容量單位） ge, a unit of dry measure for grain （=1 decilitre）
  • 裁 : Ⅰ動詞1 （用刀、剪等把片狀物分成若干部分; 剪裁; 割裂） cut （paper cloth etc ） into parts 2 （把...
  • 判 : Ⅰ動詞1 （分開; 分辨） distinguish; discriminate 2 （評定） judge; decide 3 （判決） sentence; con...
  • 綜合 : 1 （歸在一起; 聯合成一個統一的整體） synthesize 2 （不同種類、不同性質的事物組合在一起） syntheti...
  • 裁判 : 1 [法律] （判決和裁定） judgment 2 [體育] （評判） act as referee; referee3 [體育] （裁判員） jud...
  1. It is also available for certain other matters such as tenancy matters under part ii of the landlord and tenant ( consolidation ) ordinance in the lands tribunal, applications to the mental health review tribunal and cases of great public concern in the coroner ' s court

    某些其他類別的案件，例如土地審裁處根據《業主與租客（綜合）條例》第ii部審理的案件、向精神健康覆核審裁處提出的申請，以及在死因裁判法庭研訊而廣受公眾關注的案件，也可接受普通法律援助。
  2. After we have a superficial realization through comparatively studying legislation example of different countries and zones, this thesis begin to probe into me rule ' s principal and theory basis. stability of the decisions and respect the procedure are two principals that must be followed defending stability of the decisions is beneficial to defend stability of law relations that are caused by decision of shareholders, defend the deal safe, promote the efficiency of the companies. respecting the procedure is beneficial to present the value of the procedure, guarantee the rights and interests of shareholders from the procedure. theory basis of deciding grounds of action and dividing the kinds of action make up theory basis of the rule of rescuing laws on decision of shareholders. the final define of grounds of action that breaking the law and the constitution of company is decided by the nature of company law and the nature of constitution of company. on the nature of company law, there are some disputes, include forced law opinion, willfully law opinion and synthetic opinion considering present company law, i think the synthetic opinion is right the nature of constitution of company has two features : self - rule and ruled by law. in general, constitution of company is a kind of self - rule law that partly ruled by law

    此外，本文還討論了確認決議不存在之訴與不當決議取消、變更之訴的存在價值，綜合考慮后，決定保留確認決議不存在之訴，廢除不當決議取消、變更之訴這一弊大於利的訴訟類別。除了總體探尋股東會決議瑕疵救濟制度的理論依據外，考慮到召集制度和決議方法在股東會決議制度上的重要性和二者具體內容的繁雜，本文還重點分析了召集制度上的瑕疵和決議方法上的瑕疵兩大訴由。另外，本文創設了「決議顯著不公正」這一新訴由以防止多數決的濫用，多數決的濫用多年來一直是股東會決議中的一大頑癥，但各國公司法卻一直對其缺乏明確的規制，筆者希冀以多數決的濫用造成決議顯著不公正這一現象作為訴由，並提出具有可操作性的標準，由法官裁量判斷是否構成多數決的濫用，以期彌補股東會表決制度上資本多數決原則的不足。
  3. The precondition of studying the distribution of burden of proof in civil lawsuit is to correctly set theoretical definitions for burden of proof as well as the object of burden of proof. going through various viewpoints upon the distribution of burden of proof, they, guided by the substantive law and the principle of justice and fairness, have respective limitations, they strive for the predictability and stability of law, but unavoidably face the problem of little flexibility, which might make the results not so fair, the substantive standards highlight a great flexibility, but might cause careless judge due to the uncertainty of standards

    綜觀證明責任分配諸說，雖均以符合實體法宗旨與公平正義原則為指導思想，但各有其局限，形式性標準致力於實現法的可預測性與穩定性，但卻不可避免地存在靈活性不足的問題，可能使證明責任負擔的結果有欠公平，實質性標準實現了靈活性的長處，卻又存在因標準不確定導致法官恣意裁判危及正義的可能。
  4. Take legislation pattern, it analyses the legislations of different countries, and probes the flaws of current system in our country. explore from concrete chosen pattern, singular crime and company crime amount aspects, compare with legislation models, we should decide the amount according to the criminals circumstances and economic condition. chapter five has a comprehensive discussion of fine penalty implement

    就罰金刑數額立法模式，首先考察了各國的立法例，分析了我國現有的罰金刑數額立法模式的局限，針對罰金刑數額立法模式的具體選擇從對自然人犯罪的罰金數額立法模式、單位犯罪罰金數額以及對罰金刑並罰時的數額規定三個方面進行了分析;就罰金刑數額裁量原則，從罰金刑裁量原則立法例比較，認為判處罰金刑，應當根據犯罪情節和犯罪人經濟狀況綜合決定罰金刑數額。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書