裁判分析法 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [cáipànfēnxīfǎ]
裁判分析法
英文
referee method of analysis- 裁 : Ⅰ動詞1 (用刀、剪等把片狀物分成若干部分; 剪裁; 割裂) cut (paper cloth etc ) into parts 2 (把...
- 判 : Ⅰ動詞1 (分開; 分辨) distinguish; discriminate 2 (評定) judge; decide 3 (判決) sentence; con...
- 分 : 分Ⅰ名詞1. (成分) component 2. (職責和權利的限度) what is within one's duty or rights Ⅱ同 「份」Ⅲ動詞[書面語] (料想) judge
- 析 : Ⅰ動詞1. (分開; 散開) divide; separate 2. (分析) analyse; dissect; resolve Ⅱ名詞(姓氏) a surname
- 法 : Ⅰ名詞1 (由國家制定或認可的行為規則的總稱) law 2 (方法; 方式) way; method; mode; means 3 (標...
- 裁判 : 1 [法律] (判決和裁定) judgment 2 [體育] (評判) act as referee; referee3 [體育] (裁判員) jud...
-
Through comparative analysis, which focused on the victim ’ s dissentient in the stage of censor prosecution, the stage when the decision of the first trial doesn ’ t take effect and already took effect, and on the basis of using the legislative and judicial experiences of other countries, the plan of specific relief system on the victim ’ s right to prosecute was brought out
通過比較分析,以被害人對于刑事訴訟中國家公訴機關審查起訴階段、一審判決作出未生效之前和判決已生效三個不同階段司法機關作出的決定或裁判的異議進行分析,在借鑒其他國家的立法和司法實踐經驗基礎上,提出了被害人追訴權救濟的具體制度方案。How to use of the currently in effect criminal procedure expert testimony system in the normal way, administrative control expert testimony institution and office workers, amplify necessary rules and regulations of the actuating of expert conclusion 、 implement of expert conclusion 、 argumentation of expert conclusion 、 authentication of expert conclusion ; up to protect litigation rights of parties in action, get on the stick of administration of justice 、 successfully achieve an end of administration of reasonable judgment all along is the focal point of the work and difficult point in our expert testimony system structure. in this paper, coupling our current the present situation of criminal expert testimony, to perfect the legal system, to resolve the problems of expert testimony system, the writer tried to study some problems of giving some enlightenment to the theory and practice of judicial appraisal institution, relate and analyze it and set forth the views and opinions on the settlement of some matters with six parts
本文從分析刑事司法鑒定及其程序入手,比較兩大法系關于刑事司法鑒定的啟動、實施、質證、認證與採信等司法證明各環節的制度規定,透視我國刑事司法鑒定程序存在的基本問題,在此基礎上提出:規定鑒定期限、對無鑒定結果不能進入訴訟或準司法程序的情況,當事人可以申請公證機關公證鑒定啟動程序的真實性和合理性、建立鑒定人出庭作證制度、裁判者對鑒定結論認證通過質證程序形成心證的過程及理由應做出公開說明等有利於我國刑事司法鑒定程序改革的具體構想。The first part : the defintion of dsb of wio. after analyz - ing the argument of the nature of gatt1947 regulations, t - he final judgement on the nature of gatt1947 regulations f - rom uruguay round, the legal nature of wto regulations, t - he nature of procedure law of understanding on rules a - nd procedures governing the settlement of disputes, defini - tion of procedure, the article points out the dsb of wto as 1 - egal procedure
第一部分:是對wto爭端解決機制的性質予以界定。通過分析gatt1947規則的性質之爭,烏拉圭回合對gatt1947規則性質的終局裁判, wto規則的法律性質, 《關于爭端解決規則與程序的諒解》的程序法性質以及程序的界定,指出wto爭端解決機制為法律程序。This thesis focuses on the topics as follows : firstly, general rules of incorporation clauses in b / l ; secondly, regulations of american and english case law regarding incorporation clause in b / l, and finally analysis of the contradiction of the judicial decisions of our country in this area. the aim of the article is to provide examples and reduce inconsistency
針對我國關于租約中仲裁條款併入問題的司法判例尚未統一和明確的現狀,本文先後介紹了提單中併入條款的一般規定;英國法關于提單併入條款的規定;美國法關于提單併入條款的規定;並在本論文中分析了我國關于租約仲裁條款併入提單的司法審判不一致的主要方面及各種現存的觀點,旨在提供一些可供借鑒的他國經驗,為司法的統一盡棉薄之力。A systematical analysis of larenz ' s jurisprudence method theory
拉倫茨裁判方法之系統分析After we have a superficial realization through comparatively studying legislation example of different countries and zones, this thesis begin to probe into me rule ' s principal and theory basis. stability of the decisions and respect the procedure are two principals that must be followed defending stability of the decisions is beneficial to defend stability of law relations that are caused by decision of shareholders, defend the deal safe, promote the efficiency of the companies. respecting the procedure is beneficial to present the value of the procedure, guarantee the rights and interests of shareholders from the procedure. theory basis of deciding grounds of action and dividing the kinds of action make up theory basis of the rule of rescuing laws on decision of shareholders. the final define of grounds of action that breaking the law and the constitution of company is decided by the nature of company law and the nature of constitution of company. on the nature of company law, there are some disputes, include forced law opinion, willfully law opinion and synthetic opinion considering present company law, i think the synthetic opinion is right the nature of constitution of company has two features : self - rule and ruled by law. in general, constitution of company is a kind of self - rule law that partly ruled by law
此外,本文還討論了確認決議不存在之訴與不當決議取消、變更之訴的存在價值,綜合考慮后,決定保留確認決議不存在之訴,廢除不當決議取消、變更之訴這一弊大於利的訴訟類別。除了總體探尋股東會決議瑕疵救濟制度的理論依據外,考慮到召集制度和決議方法在股東會決議制度上的重要性和二者具體內容的繁雜,本文還重點分析了召集制度上的瑕疵和決議方法上的瑕疵兩大訴由。另外,本文創設了「決議顯著不公正」這一新訴由以防止多數決的濫用,多數決的濫用多年來一直是股東會決議中的一大頑癥,但各國公司法卻一直對其缺乏明確的規制,筆者希冀以多數決的濫用造成決議顯著不公正這一現象作為訴由,並提出具有可操作性的標準,由法官裁量判斷是否構成多數決的濫用,以期彌補股東會表決制度上資本多數決原則的不足。Based on the analyzing the different model of judicial review between the anglo - american legal system and continental legal system, the essay constructs the basic principles, independent tribunal, qualified plaintiff, scope of review, standard of review, procedure and transparency issue of the modern chinese system of judicial review. the essay proposes that the chinese judicial review should be subject to the sovereignty and independence principle, and an independent tribunal enforces the judicial review by impartial procedure at last, the essay gives some other advices regarding to how to further improve the system of judicial review by establishing a really independent court and by revising the law
第五部分在比較分析wto規則對司法審查的要求和我國現行司法審查制度的基礎上,構建了我國了司法審查制度的原則、司法審查機構、適格原告,司法審查范圍、司法審查標準、司法審查程序和透明度問題,提出wto下的我國司法審查制度應是以主權原則和獨立司法審查原則等原則為基礎,由獨立的司法審查機構遵循公平程序,迅速對適格原告與被訴行政機關爭議的具體行政行為、抽象行政行為和終局裁決行政行為進行合法性審查,並且要求法律法規和司法判決的公布符繩明度原則的制度。Take legislation pattern, it analyses the legislations of different countries, and probes the flaws of current system in our country. explore from concrete chosen pattern, singular crime and company crime amount aspects, compare with legislation models, we should decide the amount according to the criminals circumstances and economic condition. chapter five has a comprehensive discussion of fine penalty implement
就罰金刑數額立法模式,首先考察了各國的立法例,分析了我國現有的罰金刑數額立法模式的局限,針對罰金刑數額立法模式的具體選擇從對自然人犯罪的罰金數額立法模式、單位犯罪罰金數額以及對罰金刑並罰時的數額規定三個方面進行了分析;就罰金刑數額裁量原則,從罰金刑裁量原則立法例比較,認為判處罰金刑,應當根據犯罪情節和犯罪人經濟狀況綜合決定罰金刑數額。Theories include football introduction, basic technique analysis and tactics analysis of football, football team organizing and training in middle schools, pedagogy & teaching methodology of football education in middle schools, and football contest rules & referee regulation
理論課有足球運動概述;足球基本技術分析;足球基本戰術分析;中學足球隊的組織與訓練;中學足球教材教法分析;足球競賽規則與裁判法。Clipping the image and judging local threshold are put forward by a lot of experimental analysis, and it works to compensate the influence lead - in by gradient and bended spectral pattern
在大量實驗分析的基礎上提出了剪裁圖像和局部閾值判斷的方法,較好的補償了譜線圖像傾斜彎曲帶來的影響。This paper ' s reasons for the " horizon ", the use of philosophical hermeneutics analysis of the formation of the basic rules and processes
本文以裁判理由為「視域」 ,運用哲學詮釋學的方法分析了其形成的基本規律和過程。The fourth part analyses the part and standard of judicial control in respects like the purpose and spirit of legislation legal evidence > legal conditions and procedures, obvious loss of justice, etc. means to carry out judicial control are mainly law - enforced adjudication and judicial suggestions
第四部分主要從立法目的和精神、法律依據、法定條件和程序、顯失公正等方面分析了司法控制的部位和標準。司法控制的落實方式主要是實體裁判和司法建議。This paper analysis and criticizes the functions and system design of china ' s judicial fee after evaluating china ' s judicial fee system and its operation. it points out that because the function of gaining resource is outstanding, while the function of adjusting the public policy is not enough, the system design hindered civilian ' s rights of litigation, impeded realization of judicial independence and judicial fairness
本文運用相關理論,在對我國裁判費用制度規范及其運作進行考察的基礎上,對我國裁判費用制度的功能定位和制度設計作出了分析、評價,指出我國裁判費用制度獲取資源的功能取向過于強烈,而實現公共政策調整的功能體現則明顯不足,以至於制度設計產生了妨害公民行使訴訟權、阻礙司法獨立與公正實現的不良後果。However, in examing the existing system established by current related department laws, obvious contradictions and incongruities can be found between that and the above due system deduced from the constitution, which are mainly manifested in the following aspects : first, lack of regulations regarding the filing of prosecutions by prosecutorial organs against major civil illegal activities committed by citizens, legal persons or other organizations hampering state and social public interests ; second, absence of regulations on the participation of civil proceedings of the prosecutorial organs ; third, absence of regulations on lodging protest against non - effective court decisions ; fourth, failure to incorporate into regulations supervision models such as the issuing of prosecutorial suggestion and notice to redress illegalities, which prove to be effective in prosecutorial practices
但是,從現行有關部門法所確立的實然制度分析,卻與上述從現行《憲法》規定推導出的應然制度之間有著明顯矛盾和不協調。這種矛盾和不協調集中地表現在:一是沒有規定檢察機關針對公民、法人或其他組織實施的侵害國家和社會公共利益的重大民事違法行為提起公訴的制度;二是沒有規定檢察機關參加民事訴訟的制度;三是沒有規定檢察機關對未生效裁判提起抗訴的制度;四是對檢察建議、糾正違法通知等這些被檢察實踐證明是行之有效的監督方式未有規定。分享友人