規范句型 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [guīfànjùxíng]
規范句型 英文
canonical sentential form
  • 規 : Ⅰ名詞1 （畫圓形的工具） instrument for drawing circles 2 （規則; 成例） rule; regulation 3 [機械...
  • 范 : 名詞1 [書面語] （模子） pattern; mould; matrix 2 （模範; 榜樣） model; example 3 （范圍） boundar...
  • 句 : 句名詞1. [書面語] （指草木初生拳狀的幼芽） tender bud2. （姓氏） a surname
  • 句型 : sentential form; sentence pattern句型分析[軟] parse of a sentential form
  1. Dsssl information technology. processing languages. document style semantics and specification language

    信息技術.處理語言.文獻類型句法和規范語言
  2. When a uml model element is type - safe, its structure and behavior closely match its specification or, in other words, it has been developed specifically for its purpose

    當uml模型元素是類型安全的時，其結構和行為貼切地與其規范相匹配，或者換句話說，它是明確地為其用途開發的。
  3. The second part of the soap protocol specification defines optional data - encoding rules for representing application - defined data types and directed graphs, and a uniform model for serializing non - syntactic data models

    Soap協議規范的第二部分定義用來表示應用程序定義的數據類型和有向圖形的可選數據編碼規則，以及一個用於序列化非句法數據模型的統一模型。
  4. Shifting the burden of proof of is the special provision and exception of the principle of burden of proof, during drafting " civil evidence code ", divergences about how to regulate the burden of proof appear, jurists have diffirent opinions on it, this paper set out from those divergences and disputes, discussing in detail with six sections : the disputes on the shifting the burden of proof, reasonable define the conception about shifting the burden of proof, the relation of shifting the burden of proof and deduction, shifting the burden of proof in present law and regulations, the function of shifting the burden of proof and the civil cases suitable for this regulation, legislative proposition. this artical elabrates the theoretical and realistic foundation of shifting the burden of proof. moreover, shifting the burden of proof is a phenomenon of proceeding and other regulations of solution to disputation, it is not confined to those laws and regulations of procedure, but also exist in substantial law

    舉證責任倒置是舉證責任分配規則中的特殊與例外，在民事證據法的草擬過程中對舉證責任倒置的存廢與否產生了分歧，法學界對此的觀點也呈現出百花齊放的態勢，本文從舉證責任倒置爭議與分歧的觀點出發，基於舉證責任倒置存在與否的爭議、舉證責任倒置概念的合理界定、舉證責任倒置與推定的關系、舉證責任倒置在我國現行法律中的體現、舉證責任倒置的功能及可適用民事案件的具體類型、舉證責任倒置立法完善的構想共六個部分具體闡述，從理論角度、司法實踐及立法構想三個不同的視角分析舉證責任倒置在我國的存在的理論意義、現實意義與立法前景，表明舉證責任倒置不僅在我國具有立法基礎而且有實踐環境，闡述舉證責任倒置雖然是出現于訴訟或是解決爭議的其他程序中的一個現象，但它又不局限於訴訟及其他解決爭議的程序規范，從現有的法律規范及法律實踐來看，舉證責任倒置與實體法是「同呼吸，共命運」的，用句老話說就是「皮之不存，毛將焉附? 」
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書