認定事實錯誤 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [rèndìngshìshícuòwù]
認定事實錯誤 英文
error of fact
  • 認 : 動詞1 （認識; 分辨） recognize; know; make out; identify 2 （建立關系） enter into a certain rela...
  • 定 : Ⅰ形容詞1 （平靜; 穩定） calm; stable 2 （已經確定的; 不改變的） fixed; settled; established Ⅱ動詞...
  • 事 : 名1 （事情） matter; affair thing; business 2 （事故） trouble; accident 3 （職業;工作） job; wor...
  • 實 : Ⅰ形容詞1 （內部完全填滿 沒有空隙） solid 2 （真實; 實在） true; real; honest Ⅱ名詞1 （實際; 事實...
  • 錯 : Ⅰ形容詞1 （錯誤; 不正確） wrong; mistaken; erroneous 2 （用於否定: 壞; 差） bad; poor 3 （交叉; ...
  • 誤 : Ⅰ名詞（錯誤） mistake; error Ⅱ動詞1 （弄錯） mistake; misunderstand 2 （耽誤） miss 3 （使受損害...
  • 認定 : 1 （確定地認為） firmly believe; affirm; identify with ; maintain; hold 2 （決心要; 很想要） set ...
  • 錯誤 : 1 （不正確） wrong; mistaken; incorrect; erroneous 2 （不正確的事物、行為等） mistake; error; blu...
  1. Anti dumping procedures on the one hand are a way of trade protection, at the same time they also are the expanding of their domestic political disputes into the arena of international trade. in a considerable number of cases, foreigners allege that china is not a market economy, they claim that the government grants chinese companies subsidies and that for this reason the prices of chinese export do not properly reflect their market value. therefore, they turn to the prices of third countries as a measure to determine whether chinese products are dumped onto their markets

    在不少的立案中，國外對我國的經濟制度均採取了錯誤地理解，仍將我國視為非市場經濟國家，認為政府過度的給予企業的資助和補貼致使我國出口價格不能真實地反映產品的市場價值，因而參照「替代國」的價格確定我國的正常值並以此為據裁定傾銷；事實上，改革開放以來中國一直在向市場經濟轉型，經過十幾年的發展，我國大部分企業已經成功地進行了體制上的改革，實現了產權明晰，政企分開，企業作為市場經濟的主體獨立地在市場上自主經營、自負盈虧，企業正在向市場化邁進，我國已經努力實現了取消全部的指令性計劃，讓市場按市場規律發展。
  2. There are provisions in other countrys that procuratorate can participate in civil procedural activitives that relate to public interests

    摘要我國《民事訴訟法》規定，檢察院可對法院認定事實錯誤、適用法律錯誤、違反法定程序以及審判人員的枉法裁判行為提出抗訴。
  3. In this text, it mainly studied about the marketing strategy and marketing management of high technique, in our country, there is a mistake idea that believe high - tech is a unique critical factor for business enterprise, but just as we can see, numerous high - tech business enterprises have been heartless eliminated from market under the situation of the technique is in the lead

    在社會上曾經存在著一種錯誤觀念，即認為在高技術企業中高技術是對企業起決定性作用的唯一因素，然而事實際上，正如經常我們可以看到的那樣，眾多的高技術企業在技術非常領先的情況下卻被市場無情淘汰出去了。
  4. Part : fix on the fact error limit in the criminal law. first of all, this sect ion contrast the difference against the statue error of fact error, think that the fact error is happening in knowledge to the natural nature of fact, the statue error is happening in knowledge to fact statue nature, the former lays special emphasis on the error the cognition on, the latter lays special emphasis on to the error which evaluated

    第二部分：刑法中的事實認識錯誤的界定。首先，這一部分比較了事實認識錯誤與法律錯誤的區別，認為事實認識錯誤是對行為的自然性質發生了不正確的認識，法律錯誤是對行為的法律性質發生了不正確的認識，前者側重於認知上的錯誤，後者側重於評價上的錯誤。
  5. Finally, fix the fact error limit, think that such ought to consist of three kinds of forms : target error, strike error and the causation error. be living on this base, get off a definition to the fact error, namely, fact error in the criminal law is that action man is living to implement in the process willfully committed a crime, constitute to committing a crime that the fact that does not need the statue rating happens correctly not understanding in the important document, the criminal fact that the criminal fact that action man who arouses anticipates against practice happens not unanimously

    最後，確定了事實認識錯誤的范圍，認為其應包括三種類型：對象錯誤、打擊錯誤和因果關系錯誤。在此基礎上，給事實認識錯誤下了一個定義，即刑法中的事實認識錯誤是指行為人在實施故意犯罪過程中，對犯罪構成要件中不需要法律評價的事實發生不正確認識，引起的行為人預想的犯罪事實與實際發生的犯罪事實之間的不一致。第三部分:事實認識錯誤的處理原則。
  6. Analyzed the theoretical basis of punishibility of impossible attempt, the author thinks that the factors of impossibility contains : the ma tck quality of act objectively and the explicit quality of direction subjectively. the act does not possess the all factors of constitution of a crime, the actor has quality intent and he has a mistaken to the fact

    通過分析不能犯未遂可罰性的理論基礎，認為不能犯未遂的成立包括以下幾點：客觀上行為具有法益侵害的相稱性及犯意指向的明確性；行為不完全具備刑法分則規定的全部構成要件；行為人主觀上具有犯罪故意；行為人對事實存在錯誤認識。
  7. First of all, to the mainland law is fastened that the criminal law a learned man handles the unpack criticizing that fact error some kinds of doctrines have been carried on the profile to that section, to think in the handle identical constitutes in the fact error inner place the important document, legally to accord with the teachings to accord with teachings more rightful than concrete ; be living to handle in the fact error that the difference constitutes between the important document, legally accord with the teachings to accord with teachings more advisable than abstracting. afterwards, doctrine over the combination, elaborate the target error separately. strike error and the causation error handle

    首先，該部分對大陸法系刑法學者處理事實認識錯誤的幾種學說進行了簡要的評析，認為在處理同一構成要件內的事實認識錯誤上，法定符合說比具體符合說更為合理;在處理不同構成要件間的事實認識錯誤上，法定符合說比抽象符合說更為可取。然後，結合以上學說，分別闡述了對象錯誤、打擊錯誤和因果關系錯誤的處理原則，並著重翻退了我國刑法學界爭議較大的同一構成要件內的打擊錯誤的處理原則，主張在發生同一構成要件內的打擊錯誤的情況下，行為人應對實際發生的侵害結果承擔故意既遂的罪責。
  8. The section sums up the main problems and expounds the four focuses : 1. the time for the constitution of the joint crime of kidnapping by force ; 2. the mistakes of the joint crime of kidnapping by force ; 3. the constitution of the discontinuation of the crime for individuals in the joint crime of kidnapping by force ; 4. the criminal liability in the joint crime of kidnapping by force

    本部分集中歸納並論述了綁架罪在司法實務中與共同犯罪的認定有關的四個焦點問題： 1 、綁架罪中成立共同犯罪的時間界點； 2 、綁架共同犯罪中的認識錯誤； 3 、綁架共同犯罪中，對個別共犯人犯罪中止的認定； 4 、綁架犯罪中，共同犯罪人的刑事責任問題。
  9. The public opinion is clear on the last point and civil servants accept modest pay cuts. even if we cannot dissuade the government from deploying unfair tactics, at least we can end up with the correct and undisputed solution in the end. this is also consistent with our original intention that we would do everything we can to protect the innocent third parties from any direct harm in this, what is essentially a subject matter of internal management of the administration

    事到如今，我承認現實與個人的主觀願望有很大的差距，例如，在開始期間，同情公務員遭遇的取態太過明顯，未能在給王局長的公開信和給香港的家書的內容上，做到不偏不倚，致令到了作出最後決定的時候，外界對早餐會產生了不少的誤解，這個判斷和處理上的錯誤，值得自我檢討。
  10. If the fact that its judgment asserts or applicable law has mistakes, and we cannot allow correcting it absolutely, that won ’ t accord with justice. besides, pursuing substantive justice is the final objective of the criminal procedure

    然而其裁判所認定的事實或者適用的法律有錯誤，若絕對不許糾正，則又與正義有背，且發現實體的真實，本屬于刑事訴訟之最終目的。
  11. By investigating the historical development of joint torts, the comparison of several department laws, different demands of instituting joint torts and single tort, legislation and judicatory practice, and analysizing former scholars " wrong cognitions about joint torts, the writer get the essence of joint torts ( the definition of joint torts ). joint torts mean that several tortfeasors have or do n ' t have joint subjective faults, but either their behaviors and invading consequents or only their invading consequents of respective behaviors are related together objectively and undividedly in same invading event. joint torts include joint torts with related faults and joint torts without related faults

    通過對共同侵權行為的歷史發展、幾個部門法的比較、共同侵權行為與單獨侵權行為的構成的不同要求、立法與司法實踐等方面進行考察，分析以往學者對共同侵權行為構成的認識誤區，得出共同侵權行為的本質應該是，即共同侵權行為的定義為：共同侵權行為指數行為人具有共同的主觀過錯，或者沒有共同的主觀過錯，但是數行為人的行為和侵害後果，在同一侵害事件中，客觀地聯繫到了一起，不可分割，或者僅僅是數行為人各自行為的侵害後果，在同一侵害事件中，客觀地聯繫到了一起，不可分割。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書