調解法官 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [diàojiěfǎguān]
調解法官 英文
concillatory judge
  • 調 : Ⅰ動詞1 （配合得均勻合適） harmonize; suit well; fit in perfectly 2 （使配合得均勻合適） mix; adju...
  • 解 : 解動詞（解送） send under guard
  • 法 : Ⅰ名詞1 （由國家制定或認可的行為規則的總稱） law 2 （方法; 方式） way; method; mode; means 3 （標...
  • 調解 : mediate; make peace; arbitrate; adjust; mediation; adjustment; accord; peacemaking; treaty; conci...
  • 法官 : judge; justice
  1. The intermediation conduct in courts in our country is a typical way of leading the nonlawsuits method in adr into lawsuits, that is, a judge performs some intermediation conduct between the two litigants as the intermediator

    四、國內外相關制度的介紹、比較西方一些國家和地區像我國那樣完全與審判過程融為一體的法院調解很難找到，但由法官主持以促成當事人達成協議為目的的糾紛解決程序卻也常見。
  2. A judge should adjudicate according to law and be careful with his words and conduct during the proceedings so as to avoid any reasonable doubts upon his neutrality from the parties and other participants

    法官調解案件應當依法進行，並注意言行審慎，避免當事人和其他訴訟參與人對其公正性產生合理的懷疑。
  3. To restructure the basic principles of the civil mediation system, perfect the procedural rules, truly implement principles of self - willingness and judgement authority, so as to restore the original requirements of a mediation system. to implement a policy of limited case review, so as to maintain the effect of the mediation agreement, and the authority of a court mediation. meanwhile, to give the litigants certain subsidy rights, so as to achieve a balance between the litigation interests and private law interests

    要重新構建民事訴訟模式，完善民事訴訟證據規則，固定法官的中立角色，減少調解過程中的強制；要建立多元化的替代性糾紛解決機制，使民事訴訟調解制度更具系統化；要重構民事調解制度的基本原則，完善程序性規定，落實自願原則和處分權原則，還調解制度本來的要求；要實行有限再審，維護調解協議的效力和法院調解的權威，同時，給予當事人一定的救濟權利，實現訴訟利益和私法利益的平衡。
  4. After retrospecting the history of chinese judicial mediation system, analyzing the effect of today ' s judicial mediation, and combining the reform of judge ' s system taking professionalism and before - try preparing procedure. then drawing lessons from the relevant systems of other countries and regions, the economic reform goal according to chinese judicial tradition should be : in the frame system of the lawsuit, purifying the way of jurisdiction enforcement, giving judge and judge assistant judicial power and mediation power respectively in the mode that trying and mediation are separated, making jurisdiction and mediation properly separated in personal identity and stage. moreover, remedying the separation of jurisdiction and mediation functionally, complemented with reconciliation system in action

    對我國法院調解制度加以歷史考察，對現行法院調解制度的效果進行分析，對民事訴訟功能及調解在司法實踐中偏差產生的根源加以探究，結合正在進行的以職業化為主線的法官制度及審前準備程序改革，再借鑒其他國家和地區的相關制度，符合我國司法傳統，比較經濟，既能遏止法院調解在實踐中產生消極作用，又能充分發揮調解功能的改革目標是：在訴訟框架體制內，純化法院審判權的行使方式，以調審分離為模式，將審判權、調解權分別賦予法官和法官助理，使得審判、調解在人員身份和階段上均適當予以分離，另輔之以訴訟中和解制度，對調審分離加以功能補救，同時建立對訴訟和解協議及民間調解協議的司法審核制度，以創建新型的法院調解制度。
  5. In order to ensure the positive role of intermediation, the scale of intermediation should be regulated and the dominating role of clients should be guaranteed. the judges " role should be objective, just and passive. the way of intermediation also needs to be regulated, for example, to increase the binding force of the intermediation agreement, to regulate non public intermediation and the negative results for the client refusing to accept intermediation

    為此，建議從立法上確定法院調解的適用范圍，限製法院調解的不適當擴張;弱化職權主義色彩，強化當事人對訴訟的支配權，置法官于中立、公正和消極的地位;規范訴訟調解的方式;明確規定調解不公開;加強調解協議對當事人和法官的約束力;規定當事人承擔拒不調解而造成的法律後果。
  6. Some nonprofessional judges are accustomed to the so - called " conciliation instead of sentence ". the characteristic of the intermediation conduct in courts and the explanation of its function making a rational analysis of the features, inherent functions and values of the intermediation conduct in courts will benefit us a lot

    其二，調解程序與審判程序合一，調解與審判不嚴格分開，而具有雙重身份的法官大都樂于調解而放棄判決，這勢必導致民事審判程序的「異化」 ，形成獨特的「調解型」審判模式。
  7. But in the judicial practice, some judges still have a preference for conciliation and there are five reasons for this : the first one is the ideological reason. traditional law culture has helped the judges form particular conciliation view ; the second is the systematic reason. " the exceeding of powers " lawsuit mode has overexpanded the jurisdiction of the courts ; the third is the objective reason

    究其原因有五：一是思想上原因，傳統法律文化形成法官獨特的調解價值觀：二是體制上原因， 「超職權主義」的訴訟模式過分膨脹了法院的審判權；三是客觀上原因，市場經濟條件下的新型訴訟層出不窮使得法官應接不暇；四是立法上原因，現行立法缺乏明確的操作規程導致調解被濫用；五是自身原因，非專業化的法官隊伍習慣于以調代判。
  8. On the other hand, owing to its defects some disadvantages emerge under new circumstances : facing the increasing contradictions and disputes judges often think of conciliation as the best way of relaxing the tension, decreasing their work pressure and establishing good work performance. during the trial of some civil cases, the so - called " conciliation instead of sentence " and " conciliation against law " phenomena can often be found. if things continue in the way, the image of the people ' s court will be injured

    但另一方面，新的歷史條件下的法院調解制度，由於自身存在的缺陷，又不可避免地產生出各種弊端，法官面對日益增多的矛盾糾紛，便將調解視為緩和矛盾糾紛、減輕工作壓力、創建工作實績的最佳手段，在審理民事案件過程中，不時地出現「以調代判」 、 「違法調解」現象。
  9. Civil cases he tried or settled include matters such as medical malpractice, wrongful death, defective products, premises liability, toxic tort, workers compensation, family law, construction cases, and commercial disputes. most of the cases have been settled through negotiated settlements or mediation procedures ; many others have been tried in state and federal district courts. additionally, mr. valdez has been certified as a mediator for over 10 years

    包德士律師mr . alfred valdez執行法律業務迄今已將近二十年，除了是聯邦及州法院的出庭律師外，包德士律師並且持有調解人mediator執照，時常接受各級法院法官指定擔任訴訟調解人一般而言，法官必需對調解人的法律素養有相當的信心才會做指定，包德士律師至今已接受法院指定擔任超過三百場次的調解人，這是其法律素養的最佳證言
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書