過失侵權行為 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [guòshīqīnquánhángwéi]
過失侵權行為 英文
negligent tort
  • 過 : 過Ⅰ動詞[口語] （超越） go beyond the limit; undue; excessiveⅡ名詞（姓氏） a surname
  • 侵 : Ⅰ動詞（侵入） invade; intrude into; infringe upon Ⅱ形容詞（接近） approaching Ⅲ名詞（姓氏） a surname
  • 權 : Ⅰ名詞1 [書面語] （秤錘） counterpoise; weight （of a steelyard）2 （權力） power; authority 3 （...
  • 行 : 行Ⅰ名詞1 （行列） line; row 2 （排行） seniority among brothers and sisters:你行幾? 我行三。where...
  • 過失 : 1 （因疏忽而犯的錯誤） fault; slip; error; misconduct; culpa; mistake; blunder 2 [法律] unpremedi...
  • 行為 : action; behaviour; conduct; deed
  1. For the treaty about the responsibility ' s quality, have four kind doctrine, is a deflect to say respectively, and the act of law say, and the direct provision of law say that say with honest repute, and the writer more incline toward the honest repute to say, quanta this is the treaty about negligence responsibility this a special stage solicit of, the parties steer the activity relating to civil law the hour to must have the heart of bona fides the status, other doctrine all some lead long strong, treaty about of occasion, traditional standpoint it is an acknowledge concordat that negligence responsibility establish does not establish, void or reversed occasion

    對于締約責任的性質，有四種學說，分別是侵權行為說，法律行為說，法律直接規定說和誠實信用說，筆者更傾向于誠實信用說，因為這是締約過失責任這一特殊階段要求的，當事人進行民事活動時必須具備誠實善良的內心狀態，其他學說都有些牽強。對于締約過失責任成立的場合，傳統的觀點是只承認合同不成立、無效或被撤銷的場合。筆者認為也應包括合同成立的場合，因為他同時也侵犯了非違約方的固有利益，雖然這部分利益不佔重點，但我們不能否認她們的存在，比如標的物有瑕疵，締約人違反保證等。
  2. According to the status quo accredited point of view, concerning the man ' s actus reus and mens rea, his conduct is neither justifiable homicide, nor unpremeditated manslaughter ( negligence or imprudence ), nor mayhem, nor tort, but indirect intentional homicide

    根據目前的通說，考慮到該男子的犯罪客觀方面和犯罪主觀方面，他的行為既不是特別防衛，也不是過失致人死亡（包括疏忽大意的過失和過于自信的過失） ，也不是故意傷害，更不是民事侵權行為，而是間接故意殺人。
  3. As to the main points that constitute the responsibility of compensation for spiritual damage, four aspects are included : first, aggression upon one ' s spirit is the presupposition of the infringer ' s taking the responsibility of compensation for spiritual damages ; second, a certain case of spiritual damages is the infringer ' s taking the responsibility of compensation for spiritual damages ; third, the infringer ' s the subjective fault ( intentional or negligent ) is the subjective condition of the infringer ' s taking the responsibility of compensation for spiritual damages ; last, the relationship between the infringer " s action and the case " s consequence should be that between cause and effect, which is the causality condition

    就精神損害賠償責任的構成要件來說，它包括四個方面的內容：第一，精神損害侵權行為是行為人承擔精神損害賠償責任的前提；第二，一定的精神損害事實和後果是承擔精神損害民事責任的客觀要件；第三，侵害人主觀上有過錯（故意和過失）是承擔精神損害賠償責任的主觀條件；第四，精神損害行為和損害後果之間有因果關系是承擔精神損害賠償責任的必要條件。對于精神損害賠償的范圍，世界各國的立法規定大不一樣。
  4. The third chapter mainly focuses on the civil indemnity liability originating from the securities manipulation. to begin with, the first part ascertains that such kind of torts generally trepasses on the object of so - called " pure economic interest ' mn next part, it demonstrates in detail the requisites with which would incur a civil damage liability. regarding the fault ( including both intention and negligence ), it put forward a viewpoint that we should impose the civil liability upon manipulations of chinese securities market on the basis of constructive fault principle. about the question of iniuria ( wrong ), the author studies two aspects, one is assumption of risk, the other is the model of determining iniuria and solutions proposed

    其中第一節首先明確了操縱市場這種侵權行為的客體即所謂「純粹財產上利益」 。第二節具體闡明了操縱市場行為民事賠償責任的構成要件。在過錯部分提出要以推定過失責任原則為基礎追究我國證券市場操縱行為的民事責任，違法部分研究了自甘冒險行為和違法認定模式及對策兩個問題，其中違法認定模式是一個創新，對改變我國目前證券市場民事索賠必須先由證監會認定違法的機制給予了批判。
  5. This dissertation, through discussing respectively and researching by comparative method as to the compensation for damages for breach of a contract and for the infringement arising from road traffic accident which is related to serve contract, raises that, there exist mutual part and difference in the scope of damages, the principle of the fixation of liability, the proof of evidence, the rule of the counteraction between faults, the undertaking of the third party for the fault liability, the dealing of the free - rider with good - faith, as to the contract law and tort law in china

    筆者在論文中，通過對具有服務合同關系的道路交通事故的違約損害賠償、侵權損害賠償的分別闡述和比較研究，說明了我國合同法和侵權行為法這兩種法律規范在賠償范圍、歸責原則、舉證責任、過失相抵規則適用、第三人過錯責任承擔、好意同乘者的處理等方面，既有相同之處，也存在諸多差異。
  6. The sipo will examine the application for a patent for invention to the substance to determine whether to grant the patent right or not. but only sometimes the sipo, on its own initiative, proceeds to examine an application for a patent for invention as to its substance when it deems it necessary. on the other conditions, an applicant shall file a request for substance examination for his own patent for invention

    申請專利是為了獲得專利權，有了專利權，他人未經專利權人許可，就不能實施其專利，如實施了，專利權人可通過向人民法院起訴或向專利管理機關請求處理來主張其權利，要求其終止侵權行為，賠償損失等如此，如果企業將其產品中的高新技術申請專利，獲得專利權，該產品就可在一段時間內獨占市場對自己不想市場化的專利技術，還可許可或轉讓其他企業，收取許可或轉讓費。
  7. The duty of tort ; c. the compensation for the result of tort. the theories of ecomomic analysis of tort law indicate that tort is a kind of action that tort - feasor breaches his duty and that the parties cannot reach an agreement in advance to solve the problem of compensation

    經濟分析法學的侵權行為經濟理論表明，侵權是一種給他人造成損害的失職行為，且對這一種行為的後果，相對人無法通過求助事先的合同來解決賠償問題，也就是說，事前談判的成本將是非常昂貴的。
  8. Trot liability for negligence presupposes causality between the negligent act and the injury to person or property

    過失侵權責任以過失行為與對人身或財產的侵權之間的因果關系為前提。
  9. Non - joint injuries are several tortfeasors " torts positing to joint injuries that can hurt others on the base of the combination of wilfulness and faults. joint torts without related faults include joint dangers and non - joint dangers

    非共同加害行為是數行為人基於故意和過失的結合致人損害的侵權行為，是與共同加害行為相對應的一種共同浸權行為。
  10. Surveying the theories and practice all over the world, the countries such as german insist on contract responsibility according to providing contract by silent information and protecting the third party. however, america and england tend to infringement responsibility, because they think there is n ' t strict contract relations between accounting and the third party, and cpa against the liability stipulated in advance. the third party can be devided to the direct third party, the predicted third party and the third party which can be predicted reasonably

    縱觀世界各國學說與實踐，德國等大陸法系國家一般主張為契約責任，這主要是以默示的信息提供契約，具保護第三人效力的契約，契約締結上的過失等理由為依據；而英美法系國家，判例和學說趨向降旗認定為一種侵權責任，因為會計師與第三人之間並無嚴格意義上的契約關系，雖然對注冊會計師而言，第三人具有合理的可被預見性，但第三人畢竟是不確定的多數人，因而會計師違反的是法律事先規定的義務，侵犯的是一般公民的權利，是絕對權，只能依侵權行為的責任構成追究責任。
  11. These are the problems that require judges to take into account when deciding the monetary amount of compensation. regarding to the current laws of intellectual property rights in macao, the aim of this thesis is to study the indemnification system related to the violation of interests of intellectual property obligee

    本文主要透過對澳門現存涉及知識產權法律制度之規范，探討有關因侵權行為造成知識產權權利人利益受損之損害賠償機制，其內容主要包括知識產權侵權損害賠償的構成要件、損害賠償的原則和標準、計算損失之范圍等等。
  12. The responsibility of the moral injury compensation consists of four factors : the tort, the injury fact, the causality between the tort and the fact and the infringer " s subjective trespass. the natural person enjoy the right of request for moral injury because of the damage of personal right. the topic, how to determine the subject position of the artificial person, the vegetable person and the disable person is discussed in this paper theoretically

    精神損害賠償責任的構成要件由侵權行為、精神損害事實、侵權行為與精神損害之間有因果關系、行為人主觀上有過錯等四個方面構成。自然人因人身權遭受非法侵害，享有精神損害賠償請求權，法人、植物人及喪失行為能力的精神病人的主體地位如何，本文從理論上進行了探討。
  13. The meaning of the responsibility contractual negligenceis further explained which have sighnificance to protect contracting parts and rights and interests. theory basic of the responsibility contractual negligence

    通過對侵權行為說、法律行為說、法律規定說、誠信原則說評析，認為締約過失責任的理論基礎是法律規定說較為妥當。
  14. We studied the type of joint act of tort, included common injury act, common dangerous act and injuring others in partnership. its intension is that several people have joint fault for damage or joint fault inferred by law, including common intention and common mistake

    研究了共同侵權行為的類型，包括共同加害行為、共同危險行為、合夥致人損害等行為:內涵即數個行為人對損害結果具有共同過錯或法律推定的共同過錯，既包括共同故意，又包括共同過失。
  15. Because a defendant is not liable, no matter how reckless his conduct, unless he owes a duty to the plaintiff. according to the accepted definition of restatement second of tort, negligence is conduct, which falls below the standard established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm

    美國第二次侵權法重述給過失侵權下的定義是：過失侵權是指一個人沒有在法律所規定的，以保護其他人免受不合理的傷害危險的法律義務范圍內行為。
  16. I. c can be divided into four categories : liability in contract of non - formation, liability in void contract of formation, liability in quasi - void contract and that in valid contract

    接著分別否定了締約過失責任基礎是侵權行為、法律行為、侵權行為及法律行為雙重基礎和誠信原則四種代表性學說，並提出了信賴說。
  17. The punitive compensation system is take the traditional compensatory damage compensate as the foundation, in compensates under the premise which the victim loses, it has punishes party causing an injury ' s mistake behavior and the deterrent illegal man multiple function. current our country is occupying the social reforming time, because the law, the laws and regulations are not perfect, has had many illegal violations behaviors. but traditional civil law damage compensate, because it does not have the punitive compensation system

    本文認為，適當地加大懲罰性賠償的適用范圍，使之適用於侵權責任、違約責任和產品責任等領域，並以侵權行為人或違約方的「故意」或「重大過失」作為適用之基本條件，全面保護受損害方的合法權益;充分發揮懲罰性賠償的懲罰、威懾等功能，減少違法行為的發生，促進社會主義市場經濟的健康有序運行。
  18. Fouth, the essay analyses the influence of liability insurance upon the criterion of liabity in tort law. liability insurance ensures and stabilizes the position of no - fault liability. liability insurance has both positive and negative influence upon the applicable scope of no - fault liability. finally, the writer concludes that criterion of liability system in our country should include both the fault liability and no - fault liability. with the case analysis, the writer again rejects to regard the equitable liability as the criterion of liability

    又次，本文從現代工業社會事故激增並趨嚴重，損失分散的思想逐漸取代損失轉移成為侵權行為法的思考方式的角度，從侵權責任體現的正義觀發生變化的角度，審視了責任保險對侵權行為法歸責原則的影響:責任保險肯定並穩定了無過錯責任原則的地位，對無過錯責任原則的適用范圍既是促進也是遏制。
  19. In the event that a court should hold that the limitations on ups s liability set forth in this agreement are unenforceable for any reason, or that any of your remedies fail of their essential purpose, you agree that in no event shall ups s total liability for any damages direct or otherwise or loss regardless of the form of action or claim, whether in contract, tort or otherwise, exceed usd 10. 00

    如果法院裁定本協議所規定的ups責任限制基於任何理由而無法執行，或閣下的任何補償未能達到其基本目的，則閣下同意，在任何情況下， ups對任何損害直接或其他形式或損失的全部責任，無論訴訟或索賠形式如何，不管是否基於合同侵權行為或其他原因，均不超過10 . 00美元。
  20. And this type of liability should character in the course of entering a contract, one party breaching the obligation with subjective fault, making the other party losses and the function of compensation. on the issues of liability basis, by criticizing tort doctrine, legal behavior doctrine, and regulatory doctrine, points out that the theoretical basis of the liability id good faith. the material foundation is subject to the liability basis, and the liability not only in the circumstances of contract coming into existence, be announced invalid and be cancelled, but possibly exists on occasion that contract is valid

    首先，文章指出締約過失責任的概念應包涵產生時間、主觀狀態、先合同義務的違反及損害的產生四個關鍵因素，具有產生於締約過程中、一方因主觀過錯違反先合同義務、給對方造成損害以及彌補功能等特徵；在責任基礎的問題上，通過對侵權行為說、法律行為說、法律規定說等反對觀點的批駁，指出締約過失責任的理論基礎是誠實信用原則，其賴以產生的事實基礎除了致合同不成立之締約過失、合同被確認無效或被撤銷之締約過失外，提出了合同有效情況下締約過失存在的可能性。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書