action for retrial 中文意思是什麼
action for retrial
解釋
要求再審的訴訟-
A preliminary discussion on improving the procedure of appealing for retrial on civil administration action
淺議民事行政抗訴制度的完善 -
The implementation of this system for more man ten years clearly shows that the multi - channel institution of retrial does not produce the desired effects. the present retrial system modelled itself mainly on that of the former soviet union, its operation in china gives rise to more state intervention than individual disposal, more layman recognised truth than truth recognised by law, seeking justice in substantial law more than legal procedure, and finally brings about " numerous applicants, unlimited lapse of time, high frequency, confused jurisdiction, unmethodical causes of action "
現行民訴法實施十多年的司法實踐表明發動再審程序主體的多元性並沒有產生預期的效果，由於現行的民事再審主要是參照前蘇聯模式，在再審程序的啟動上，強調國家干預權，忽視當事人處分權；在事實認定上，追求客觀真實，忽視法律真實；在糾錯上，注重實體公正，忽視程序公正；從而導致在實際操作中出現了啟動再審的「主體無限、時間無限、次數無限、審級無限、理由或條件無限」的不良現象。 -
In the treatise, the author believes that civil procedure for trial supervision is a procedure that people ' s procuratorate, on the basis of legal supervision rights, or a party to an action, on the basis of rights to apply for retrial, finds that there is error in a legally effective judgment or mediation agreement made by a people ' s court and asks for the court to retrial
筆者認為，民事審判監督程序是指人民檢察院基於法律監督權，當事人基於再審申請權，認為人民法院已生效的民事判決或調解協議確有錯誤，依照法定程序，要求人民法院並由人民法院依法對該案件進行再審的程序。 -
In the application of criminal supervision procedure regard, we should perfect the legislation on subject of complaint cause of appeal, period of petition for retrial, mode of appeal, in order to set up litigious right of action in supervision procedure ; on the reform of the judicial mechanism in the retrial, we should enhance jurisdictional rank of retrial and increase transparence of retrial hearing, we should define the time limit for retrial and implement the system of court of first instance being the final in the retrial
在再審程序啟動機制上，完善再審申請主體、申請理由、申請期限、申請方式等制度規范，建立再審申請之訴；在再審審判機制改革中，應提高再審管轄審級、增加審理程序透明度、嚴格規范審理期限，並實行再審一審終審制。 -
Under the guidance of these principles, the author suggest four points of reform : rebuild the mechanism of initiating the retrial process ; narrow the scope of the causes of action for retrial ; clarify and fix the time limit for the initiating of retrial ; in matter of procedure, jurisdiction should be given to court of upper level to review the case submitted for retrial, which should be final and under limitation of time and contents to be heard
借鑒國外的民事再審制度，結合我國的國情，在改造再審制度時，應當放棄對公正價值的片面追求，確定「當事人意思自治」和「依法糾錯」原則。重整民事再審的發動機制，確立再審之訴；規范啟動再審的理由；限定提起再審之訴的時間；確立以提審為原則的再審管轄制度，實行再審一次終局制，同時明確再審的審限。
分享友人