adjudicative power 中文意思是什麼
adjudicative power
解釋
審判權- adjudicative : adj. 判決的。
- power : n 1 力，力量；能力；體力，精力；（生理）機能；〈常 pl 〉才能。2 勢力，權力，權限；威力；政權；權...
-
With an eye to the disjoint of law and practice, chapter 1 demonstrates that the adjudicative power shall belong to adjudicator de jure
第一章著眼於法律的規定與現實的脫節，論證裁判權應當歸法定的裁判者。 -
If one can say criminal trial is the center of criminal procedure, then one should say who should have adjudicative power is the key issue of criminal trial
如果說刑事審判是刑事訴訟的中心環節，那麼，刑事裁判權的歸屬問題則是這一中心環節的核心問題。 -
After demonstrating that adjudicative power shall be allocated to adjudicators de jure, the author discuses the disjoint of adjudicator de jure and adjudicator de facto in section ii of this chapter
人民代表大會制度是我國的根本制度，人民代表大會是我國的國家權力機關，其他國家機關都是人民代表大會產生的，受人民代表大會監督。人民法院也不例外。 -
When investigation is not monitored with adjudicative power, the findings in such an investigation may be directly used as adjudicatory evidence, adjudicatory justice, judicial independenc e, and the defendant ' s right of defense will be entirely undermined
當偵查不受審判權監控並且偵查所獲可以直接用作審判證據時，審判公正，司法獨立和被告人的抗辯權就都遭到了根本的破壞。 -
There exists some malpractices for our traditional civil executive systems in power installation, management and operation, and it should be restructured according to the division theory of administration and rights - and - obligations in the civil executive power : under the condition that executive power is still installed in courts, administrative executive departments should be set up for its full implementation, separate implementation is also encouraged according to the different natures and characteristics of executive and adjudicative powers, and its implementation should be handed to the intermediate courts or higher to guarantee the justice of adjudication
我國傳統的民事執行制度在權力的設置、管理、運行等方面存在弊端，應依據民事執行權的行政權屬性和權能劃分的理論進行重構：在執行權仍配置於法院的前提下，設立行政化的執行局專司執行，並按照實施權和裁決權的不同性質和特點實行分離行使，為保證裁決權的公正性，應統一交由中級以上人民法院行使。 -
The proposals aimed at preserving the adjudicatory committee do not overcome these malpractices. thus the adjudicative power of the adjudicatory committee but not the committee itself shall be canceled, and adjudicator de jure shall only be judges and people ' s assessors carrying out criminal trials
根據司法獨立的要求，法官在從事審判時，要獨立於其上級和同事，任何人都不得對法官如何進行裁判作出指示，法官進行裁判的依據，只能是法律的明文規定和依法認定的案件事實。 -
With an eye to the systematic of judicial interpretation, the inherent requirement of judicial independence, the nature of criminal adjudication, the accordance of power and responsibili ty, and the semanteme of judicial independence, the author finds out that the principle of " the people ' s courts shall exercise judicial power independently " shall also include the personal independence of individual judges. on this basis, the author reviews the adjudicative power endowed with the adjudicatory committee by law and holds that this provision has its historical significance, yet its application in today brings more malpractice than benefits. its application goes against the justness, the quality and the efficiency of the administration of justice, and goes against the realization of other important functions of the adjudicatory committee, the improvement of the skills and abilities of the judges
在此基礎上，筆者對我國法律賦予審判委員會實質意義上的裁判權的規定進行了評析，認為，審判委員會行使裁判權，雖然有其存在的歷史原因，但在現在已經是弊大於利，它不利於司法公正，不利於保證案件質量，不利於提高訴訟效率，不利於提高訴訟效益，不利於審判委員會其他職能的正常發揮，不利於提高法官素質，理論界和實務界提出的種種保留審判委員會的裁判權的主張，並不能克服審判委員會行使裁判權的弊端，因此，應當取消審判委員會的裁判權（不是廢除審判委員會） ，法定的裁判者只能是負責個案審判的法官和人民陪審員。
分享友人