dworkin 中文意思是什麼

dworkin 解釋
德沃金
  1. See ronald dworkin, no right answer ? in law, morality, and society, essays in honour of h. l. hart, p. m. s. hacker and j. rax eds., clarendon press oxford, 1977, pp58 - 59

    關于憲法解釋與法律解釋的具體區別可參見韓大元: 《論合憲性推定原則》 , 《山西大學學報》 (哲學社會科學版) 2004年第3期。
  2. In defending free speech, ronald dworkin stresses that any censorship on grounds of content is inconsistent with the liberal commitment to individual moral autonomy

    在當代西方思想界,德沃金是反對政府管制仇恨言論最力的論者。
  3. Between principles and policies : ronald dworkin and constructing an ideal jurist

    和理想法律人的建構
  4. See ronald dworkin, hard cases, 88 harv. l. rev. 1057, 1060 ( 1975 ). also see taking rights seriously, rev. ed. ( cambridge, mass : harvard university press, 1978 ), 84

    阿圖爾?考夫曼、溫弗里德?哈斯默爾主編: 《當代法哲學和法律理論導論》 ,鄭永流譯, (北京:法律出版社, 2001 ) , 361 。
  5. Law in the view of dworkin : toward the interpretation of

    走向整體性法律解釋之路
  6. And his thought on " internal view " achieved the original link to sociology. following and surpassing hart ' s study of paradigm, dworkin advanced his idea on " internal participant ". compared with him, hart was skilled in analysis and he introduced common linguistic philosophy into jurisprudent field in the consequences of transformation and new realm of legal research

    哈特提出了著名的「最低限度內容的自然法」命題,標志著向自然法學的重大讓步; 「內在觀點」的思想完成了向社會學法學的最初溝通,德沃金正是沿著並超越了哈特的範式研究,提出了「內在參與者」的觀點;而哈特精於分析,將日常語言哲學引入法學領域,完成了二十世紀法學研究的語言學轉向,開拓了法哲學研究的新境界。
  7. While advocating individual rights, dworkin presents conceptions of the independent right of morality and the right of treatment and respect as an equal

    德沃金在論述權利問題時,提出了個人道德獨立權利以及平等關懷和尊重的權利j 。
  8. Hart severely criticized two kinds of extreme rule patterns ormalism and skepticism with his own theory of rules as standard. he developed that legal interpreting principle was combined with " meaning concentration " and " open texture " ; dworkin strongly refuted hart ' s theory. he thought that law consists of rules, principles and policies and he expounded his elaborating and integrated legal interpretation theory

    哈特以規則說為基礎,嚴厲批評了形式主義和規則懷疑主義兩種極端的規則模式,提出了法律的解釋原則是「意思中心」和「開放結構」規則形式的結合;德沃金堅決反對哈特的理論,認為法律是由規則、原則和政策構成的法律模式體系,論述了他的闡釋性的完整性的法律解釋理論。
  9. Part ii : debate on the relationship of law and morality between hart and dworkin

    第二部分:哈特與德沃金就法律和道德關系展開了論戰。
  10. Dworkin ' s theory of legal principle and thesis of rights are two main important parts of his legal philosophy

    法律原則理論和權利法哲學是德沃金法律理論的兩個主要組成部分。
  11. The equal concept is a core of political philosophy of dworkin, equal care and respecting embodies a kind of essencial equality

    摘要平等概念是德沃金政治哲學的核心,平等關懷與尊重體現的是一種實質平等。
  12. Through a critical examination of these arguments, the present article aims to cast doubt on dworkin ' s forceful insistence that hate speech not be regulated

    本文以仇恨言論相關課題作為探討重心,針對德沃金的反管制論證及其理論基礎,進行分析與批評。
  13. Ronald dworkin, taking rights seriously, harvard university press, 1977, pp. 6 - 7

    鄭永流著: 《法治四章》 ,中國政法大學出版社2002年版,第369頁。
  14. Dworkin on the conception of legal integrity

    走向整體性法律解釋之路
  15. See ronald dworkin, freedom ' s law : the moral reading of the american constitution, harvard university press, 1996, p6

    參見韓大元、張翔: 《試論憲法解釋的客觀性與主觀性》 , 《法律科學》 1999年第6期。
  16. Chapter 2 is mainly consisted of the moral incorporation thesis and the sources thesis that are respond to the ronald dworkin ' s attack on the separation thesis through legal principles theory and normative rules theory

    因此,任何反對分離命題的立場都應排除于實證主義之外。第二章的核心問題在於研究德沃金運用原則理論與規范規則對分離命題的挑戰,以及實證主義對此的回應。
  17. By probing into the legal positivism and pragmatism dominant in the field of the american judicial science, dworkin has build up a new judicial theory with the concept of interpretive law as a breakthrough and the matter of principle, constructive interpretation of law and integrative law as the major contents

    通過對美國法律界佔主導地位的實證主義和實用主義思潮的解剖和反思,德沃金提出了以「闡釋的法」為理論前提,以原則觀、建設性法闡釋模式和整體性法律原則為主要內容的司法理論。
  18. What is your idea about the the inclusive positivism and the exclusive positivism ? which school can response to the dworkin ' s critique against h. l. a. hart better

    當前實證主義的基本分野是包容性的實證主義和排他性的實證主義,您對這兩派是怎樣看的?哪一派更有助於回應德沃金對哈特的批評?
分享友人